On Thursday, February 7, 2019 at 11:45:23 PM UTC-7, Kaka wrote:
> for i in range(len(A.hp)):
>
> for j in range(len(run_parameters.bits_Mod)):
> req_slots[j] = math.ceil((A.T[i])
>
> for g in Temp[i]["Available_ranges"][j]:
> for s in range(g[0], g[-1]):
>
On Thursday, August 30, 2018 at 10:08:34 AM UTC-6, Νίκος Βέργος wrote:
> I did try it with 'None' and as page='index.html' Flask return an error both
> ways (while bottle framework does not)
I think you are mistaken, making the change I suggested
fixes the "TypeError: index() missing 1 required p
On Wednesday, August 29, 2018 at 10:57:35 AM UTC-6, Νίκος Βέργος wrote:
> Flask app.py
> ==
> @app.route( '/' )
> @app.route( '/' )
> def index( page ):
>
> # use the variable form template for displaying
> counter = '''
>
> td> Αριθμός Επισκεπτών:
>
On 11/09/2017 10:51 AM, Rhodri James wrote:
> On 09/11/17 17:41, Michael Torrie wrote:
>> On 11/09/2017 09:33 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
>>> On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 2:14 AM, Rurpy via Python-list
>>> wrote:
>>>> On 11/08/2017 11:29 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
On 11/09/2017 09:33 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 2:14 AM, Rurpy via Python-list
> wrote:
>> On 11/08/2017 11:29 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
>>> [...]
>>> Please, Jon, accept that we were not deliberately trying
>>> to put you dow
On 11/08/2017 11:29 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> [...]
> Please, Jon, accept that we were not deliberately trying
> to put you down. Steve, if you can clearly state your position on this
> (possibly worded in the form of an apology?), it would go a long way
> to clearing this up.
> ChrisA
Are you t
On 11/08/2017 08:18 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
> Ned Batchelder writes:
> [...]
>> Second, now you want us to agree that calling someone arrogant isn't
>> an attack?
>
> It's one thing to say “this idea is arrogant”, which is what Steve did.
> That's not in any way personal, nor an attack on a person.
On 06/26/2017 09:42 AM, Steve D'Aprano wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Jun 2017 01:16 am, Ben S. wrote:
>
>> print mm + "/" + dd + "/" + + " " + hour + ":" + mi + ":" + ss
>> ^
>> SyntaxError: Missing parentheses in call to 'print'
>>
>> Whats wrong?
>
> Did you read the error message?
>
> Missing
On 04/22/2017 05:17 AM, Rustom Mody wrote:
> On Friday, April 21, 2017 at 2:38:08 PM UTC+5:30, Antoon Pardon wrote:
>> Op 20-04-17 om 17:25 schreef Rustom Mody:
>>> But more importantly thank you for your polite and consistent pointing out
>>> to
>>> Ben Finney that his religion-bashing signature
On 04/20/2017 01:46 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
>[...]
> I am not obliged to address every point of every post, and the absence
> of comment on any particular point is not generally to be read as full
> assent.
Certainly anyone is free to choose to ignore bigotry on the list,
because one agrees with it,
On 04/20/2017 09:25 AM, Rustom Mody wrote:
>[...]
> No one seems to have noticed who Rurpy is defending : Ranting Rick and Bart.
> Sheesh!
> A rhinocerous would have gossamer skin compared to these 'gentlemen'
> Sheesh² !
You are mistaken. I am not defending Rick or Bart both of whom I am
well a
On 04/19/2017 08:27 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
> Rurpy via Python-list writes:
>
>> You and Chris refused to find any fault with the use of the two
>> stereotypes under discussion one of which was "unable-to-learn old
>> people".
>
> I expressed absolutely no
On 04/17/2017 03:39 AM, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
>[...]
I meant to respond to this earlier but forgot to. I'll respond
to the following part now since there seems to be some confusion
about my motives/intent.
> In my experience, the bar for banning participants is pretty high, and
> rightly so. Car
On 04/19/2017 01:56 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
> Rurpy via Python-list writes:
>
>> I don't think stupid black people or senile old people should be
>> allowable because those are not choosable *behaviors*. But is
>> unable-to-learn old people a choosable behavior?
On 04/18/2017 04:34 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 8:28 AM, Ben Finney
> wrote:
>> Chris Angelico writes:
>>
>>> The charge has been examined and dropped. Steven did not violate the
>>> CoC. Please stop talking as if he has. He *was accused of* violating
>>> it, and then fo
On 04/18/2017 04:34 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 8:28 AM, Ben Finney
> wrote:
>> Chris Angelico writes:
>>
>>> The charge has been examined and dropped. Steven did not violate the
>>> CoC. Please stop talking as if he has. He *was accused of* violating
>>> it, and then fou
On 04/18/2017 09:35 AM, Wildman via Python-list wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Apr 2017 03:28:32 +, Rurpy wrote:
>> On 04/17/2017 08:19 PM, Wildman via Python-list wrote:
>>> [...]
>>> Your words remind me of this:
>>>
>>> "The seriousness of the charge mandates that we investigate
>>> this. Even though t
On 04/18/2017 09:29 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 1:03 AM, Rurpy via
> Python-list wrote:
>> On 04/18/2017 08:19 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
>>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 12:01 AM, Rurpy via
>>> Python-list wrote:
>>>> I have nothing p
On 04/18/2017 08:19 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 12:01 AM, Rurpy via
> Python-list wrote:
>> I have nothing personal against Steven. He called someone out
>> for being bigoted, then repeated the exact same offense himself.
>
> The charge has b
On 04/18/2017 07:16 AM, Mario R. Osorio wrote:
> Feels like this is something personal against Steven. You should
> probably take this to court. I'd rather read Steven's insightful
> answers and rants than you crying. None here is meant to sugar coat
> anything, and if that is what you are looking
On 04/17/2017 08:19 PM, Wildman via Python-list wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Apr 2017 08:23:34 +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
>> Paul Rubin writes:
>>> Rurpy writes:
A couple weeks ago a frequent poster here (Steve D'Aprano
) called another participant an "ugly
american"
>>>
>>> Oh stop trolling.
On 04/17/2017 04:38 AM, Ben Finney wrote:
> Rurpy via Python-list writes:
>
>> A couple weeks ago a frequent poster here (Steve D'Aprano
>> ) called another participant an "ugly
>> american" [*1].
>
> He gave no explicit reference, and so I can see w
A couple weeks ago a frequent poster here (Steve D'Aprano
) called another participant an "ugly american"
[*1]. This was followed just a couple weeks later with another post from Mr.
D'Aprano attacking a participant as "an old man" who can't understand new
technology, a blatant example of agei
On 04/13/2017 08:13 PM, Steve D'Aprano wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Apr 2017 07:56 pm, bart4...@gmail.com wrote:
> [...]
>> (** Although I find code full of class definitions, one-liners, decorators
>> and all the other esoterics, incomprehensive. I'm sure I'm not the only
>> one, so perhaps readability isn
On Saturday, March 4, 2017 at 9:37:35 AM UTC-7, Wanderer wrote:
> On Saturday, March 4, 2017 at 11:31:13 AM UTC-5, Chris Angelico wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 5, 2017 at 3:22 AM, Wanderer wrote:
> > > I mostly just lurk and view the post titles to see if something
> > > interesting is being discussed. T
On 03/14/2016 05:19 PM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> On 14/03/2016 22:40, BartC wrote:
> > [...a polite and reasonable comment...]
>
> Drivel. Any establised member of this community, or any other
> community for that matter, will always publish, unless, like the RUE,
> they've got something to hide. S
On Thursday, November 5, 2015 at 8:12:22 AM UTC-7, Seymore4Head wrote:
> On Thu, 05 Nov 2015 11:54:20 +1100, Steven D'Aprano
> wrote:
> >On Thu, 5 Nov 2015 10:02 am, Seymore4Head wrote:
> >> So far the only use I have for regex is to replace slicing, but I
> >> think it is an improvement.
> >
> >
On 11/05/2015 01:18 AM, Christian Gollwitzer wrote:
> Am 05.11.15 um 06:59 schrieb rurpy:
>>> Can you call yourself a well-rounded programmer without at least
>>> a basic understanding of some regex library? Well, probably not.
>>> But that's part of the problem with regexes. They have, to some
>>>
On Wednesday, November 4, 2015 at 7:46:24 PM UTC-7, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 11:24 AM, rurpy wrote:
> The "take away" that I recommend is: Rurpy loves to argue in favour of
> regular expressions,
No, I don't love it, I quite dislike it.
> but as you can see from the other p
On 11/04/2015 07:24 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Nov 2015 11:24 am, wrote:
>
>> You will find they are an indispensable tool, not just in Python
>> programming but in many aspects of computer use.
>
> You will find them a useful tool, but not indispensable by any means.
>
> Hint:
>
> - Ho
On Wednesday, November 4, 2015 at 7:31:34 PM UTC-7, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Nov 2015 11:13 am, rurpy wrote:
>
> > There would be far fewer computer languages, and they would be much
> > more primitive if regular expressions (and the fundamental concepts
> > that they express) did not ex
On 11/04/2015 05:33 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 11:13 AM, rurpy--- via Python-list
> wrote:
>> On 11/04/2015 07:52 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
>>> On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 1:38 AM, rurpy wrote:
>>>> I'm afraid you are making a category
On Wednesday, November 4, 2015 at 4:05:06 PM UTC-7, Seymore4Head wrote:
>[...]
> I am still here, but I have to admit I am not picking up too much.
The "take away" I recommend is: the folks here are often way
overly negative regarding regular expressions and that you not
ignore them, but take the
On 11/04/2015 07:52 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 1:38 AM, rurpy wrote:
>> I'm afraid you are making a category error but perhaps that's in
>> part because I wasn't clear. I was not talking about computer
>> science. I was talking about human beings learning about computers.
On Wednesday, November 4, 2015 at 1:52:31 AM UTC-7, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Wednesday 04 November 2015 18:21, Christian Gollwitzer wrote:
>
> > What rurpy meant, was that regexes can surface to a computer user
> > earlier than variables and branches; a user who does not go into the
> > depth t
On 11/03/2015 08:48 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Wednesday 04 November 2015 11:33, rurpy wrote:
>
>>> Not quite. Core language concepts like ifs, loops, functions,
>>> variables, slicing, etc are the socket wrenches of the programmer's
>>> toolbox. Regexs are like an electric impact socket wre
I should have checked the web site before posting, it
appears that both libpst and libpff only read pst files,
no write. Sorry for the noise.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 11/03/2015 12:09 PM, Anthony Papillion wrote:
> Does anyone know of a module that allows the wiring of Outlook PST
> files using Python? I'm working on a project that will require me to
> migrate 60gb of maildir mail (multiple accounts) to Outlook.
I used libpst (http://www.five-ten-sg.com/libp
On Monday, November 2, 2015 at 9:38:24 PM UTC-7, Michael Torrie wrote:
> On 11/02/2015 09:23 PM, rurpy--- via Python-list wrote:
> >> My completely unsolicited advice is that regular expressions shouldn't be
> >> very high on the list of things to learn. They are very us
On 11/03/2015 12:15 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Nov 2015 03:23 pm, rurpy wrote:
>
>> Regular expressions should be learned by every programmer or by anyone
>> who wants to use computers as a tool. They are a fundamental part of
>> computer science and are used in all sorts of matching
On Monday, November 2, 2015 at 8:58:45 PM UTC-7, Joel Goldstick wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 10:17 PM, Seymore4Head
> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2 Nov 2015 20:42:37 -0600, Tim Chase
> > wrote:
> >
> > >On 2015-11-02 20:09, Seymore4Head wrote:
> > >> How do I make a regular expression that returns t
On 11/02/2015 08:51 PM, Michael Torrie wrote:
>[...]
> Indeed, sometimes Jamie Zawinski's is often quite appropriate:
>
> Some people, when confronted with a problem, think "I know, I'll use
> regular expressions." Now they have two problems.
Or its sometimes heard paraphrase:
Some people,
On Sunday, November 1, 2015 at 2:48:58 PM UTC-7, Laura Creighton wrote:
> Actually, adding the XP - do not look here --
> message for several webpages has been on the pydotorg
> todo list for more than a week now.
>
> Not sure why it hasn't happened.
>
> Thank you for the reminder.
You're welcom
On 11/01/2015 09:43 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 3:24 AM, rurpy--- via Python-list
> wrote:
>> I dont recall seeing anyone posting asking why they could not get
>> Python to install on Windows 95 recently. I only read this group
>> intermittent
On Sunday, November 1, 2015 at 8:52:55 AM UTC-7, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 2:43 AM, rurpy--- via Python-list
> wrote:
> > Why, oh why, do the python.org front page and other pages that offer
> > a Windows download not say a word about it not run
On 11/01/2015 03:06 AM, Chris Warrick wrote:
> On 1 November 2015 at 09:23, t_ciorba--- via Python-list
> wrote:
>>
>> hi, i am not sure what is wrong, but after launching the installer
>> for windows XPsp3 python-3.5.0.exe i couldnt see what i have to
>> select, it was a white board and the onl
On Monday, September 14, 2015 at 5:23:32 PM UTC-6, Laura Creighton wrote:
>[...]
> I don't know about the others, but I am finding this rather more
> entertaining than another round of 'python -- does it have pointers'
> in python-list.
Could we please dispense with the gratuitous "what I'm intere
On 09/13/2015 06:50 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 04:45 am, ru...@yahoo.com wrote:
>> On 09/12/2015 10:32 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>>> On Sat, 12 Sep 2015 02:42 pm, Random832 wrote:
>>> [...]
>>> Computer science and IT is *dominated* by a single usage for "pointer" --
>>> it's
On Sunday, September 13, 2015 at 2:49:13 PM UTC-6, Ben Finney wrote:
> Chris Angelico writes:
>
> > I think Ben's referring to taunting jmf, whom Mark called the "RUE" or
> > "Resident Unicode Expert". There has been a long-standing antagonism
> > between those two (which is completely understand
On 09/12/2015 08:42 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
> Michael Torrie writes:
>> On 09/12/2015 08:22 PM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
>>> You appear to have the same level of knowledge of Python internals as
>>> the RUE has of the Python 3.3+ FSR unicode implementation. Let's have
>>> some fun, is Python pass by
On Saturday, September 12, 2015 at 6:25:39 PM UTC-6, ru...@yahoo.com wrote:
> On 09/12/2015 05:39 PM, Rustom Mody wrote:
> [...]
> > which may be summarized as:
> > 1. Steven (quoting Online dictionary): Pointer = Address
> > 2. Steven: "Python has pointers" is ridiculous
> > 3. Python docs: id ret
On 09/12/2015 06:02 PM, Ned Batchelder wrote:
> On Saturday, September 12, 2015 at 7:15:18 PM UTC-4, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> [...]
> But in C, pointers mean more than that. You can perform arithmetic on
> them, to access memory as a linearly addressed abstraction. Python has
> nothing like this.
>
On 09/12/2015 05:39 PM, Rustom Mody wrote:
> On Sunday, September 13, 2015 at 4:05:21 AM UTC+5:30, ru...@yahoo.com wrote:
>> On 09/12/2015 04:14 PM, Emile van Sebille wrote:
>>> On 9/12/2015 12:58 PM, rurpy--- via Python-list wrote:
>>>
>>>> The ques
On 09/12/2015 05:14 PM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> On 12/09/2015 23:34, rurpy--- via Python-list wrote:
>> On 09/12/2015 04:14 PM, Emile van Sebille wrote:
>>> On 9/12/2015 12:58 PM, rurpy--- via Python-list wrote:
>>>
>>>> The question is whether what "p
On 09/12/2015 04:14 PM, Emile van Sebille wrote:
> On 9/12/2015 12:58 PM, rurpy--- via Python-list wrote:
>
>> The question is whether what "pointer" means in languages that use the
>> word is*so* different than its meaning in the Python sense
>
> I can'
On 09/12/2015 11:48 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 02:17 am, ru...@yahoo.com wrote:
> [...]
>> the model of Python I eventually
>> developed is very much (I think, haven't read the whole thread) like
>> Random832's. I think of boxes (objects) with slots containing "pointers"
>>
On 09/12/2015 10:32 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Sep 2015 02:42 pm, Random832 wrote:
>[...]
> Computer science and IT is *dominated* by a single usage for "pointer" --
> it's an abstract memory address. The fundamental characteristics of
> pointers are:
Just upthread, you claimed someth
Picking a post to respond to, more or less at random...
On Saturday, September 12, 2015 at 9:14:00 AM UTC-6, Rustom Mody wrote:
> On Saturday, September 12, 2015 at 8:11:49 PM UTC+5:30, Laura Creighton wrote:
> > In a message of Sat, 12 Sep 2015 05:46:35 -0700, Rustom Mody writes:
> > >How about l
On Thursday, September 10, 2015 at 6:18:39 AM UTC-6, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Sep 2015 05:18 am, Chris Angelico wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 5:14 AM, Laura Creighton wrote:
> >> In a message of Thu, 10 Sep 2015 05:00:22 +1000, Chris Angelico writes:
> >>>To get started, you need s
On 08/17/2015 01:52 AM, Laura Creighton wrote:
> In a message of Sun, 16 Aug 2015 22:05:29 -0700, rurpy--- via Python-list
> writes:
>> So I eventually found the kivy docs on their website where they
>> list prerequisite packages for installing kivy on ubuntu. I'll
On Sunday, August 16, 2015 at 10:14:29 PM UTC-6, Laura Creighton wrote:
> In a message of Sun, 16 Aug 2015 20:19:49 -0700, rurpy--- via Python-list
> writes:
> >On Sunday, August 16, 2015 at 8:00:14 PM UTC-6, Chris Angelico wrote:
> >>[...]
> >> use pip (maybe in
On Sunday, August 16, 2015 at 8:00:14 PM UTC-6, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 5:16 AM, shiva upreti
> wrote:
> > I am new to linux. I tried various things in attempt to install kivy. I
> > installed python 2.7.10 (I think python3 was already installed in ubuntu
> > 14.04). The
62 matches
Mail list logo
