On Apr 16, 11:06 am, Steve Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not saying people shouldn't use Google Groups. I'm saying that
> Google can "justify" providing customer "support" that lives somewhere
> between zero and extremely crappy by not charging for the service.
It's even worse than that
On Apr 15, 11:55 am, egbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What is the role or position of C# in this context ?
> If I remember well, some people have said that C# is an improved
> C++ or Java.
C# is more similar to Java than C++. Neither is very similar to C++,
except in some cosmetic syntactic wa
On Apr 15, 3:07 am, Paul Anton Letnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> but C bogs you down with administrative stuff (try converting an int
> to a string; I found myself googling for an hour!).
It took an hour to find sprintf()?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Apr 14, 8:48 am, 一首诗 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But, it is still not as fast as 1.
So if speed is the #1 design goal, use pure C. If not, develop in
pure Python and, if the application is too slow, profile the code and
look for bottlenecks that can be optimized. There's a good chance
that
On Apr 14, 1:44 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello, I was hoping to get some opinions on a subject. I've been
> programming Python for almost two years now. Recently I learned Perl,
> but frankly I'm not very comfortable with it. Now I want to move on
> two either Java or C++, but I'm not sure wh
On Apr 14, 2:24 am, bdsatish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Apr 14, 12:21 pm, Bob Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > in 342367 20080414 074410 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > >Hello, I was hoping to get some opinions on a subject. I've been
> > >programming Python for almost two years now. Rec
On Apr 4, 6:58 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I was wondering if anyone knew of some online (free if possible)
> advanced tutorials, especially ones that provides tasks and ideas for
> small projects. The issue for myself is I want to improve my python
> programming level, and my ability to program
On Mar 30, 1:22 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> That's weird. I feel like I could go on about an introductory program
> for days and days, la.
>
> I usually start (both times) with interpreted vs. compiled. It's a
> layer of abstraction. But it's very weird; the layers can't tell
> either of ea
On Mar 31, 11:07 am, Laurent Pointal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> You may look at "Dive into Python", there is an online version,
> translation in some languages other than english (if needed). It propose
> a line by line explanation on many scripts targetting language and
> libraries usage.
>
> h
On Apr 1, 9:44 pm, Jimmy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, everyone
>
> I am using Pygame to write a small program. I tried to load a .jpg
> picture into
> the screen, however, the size of the pic doesn't fit into the window
> properly. Can
> anyone tell me how to scale the picture into the window?
On Apr 1, 2:42 pm, "Eduardo O. Padoan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 4:20 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > You misunderstand. C++ has a lot of "warts" to maintain backwards
> > compatibility with C. The standards committee could eliminate these
> > warts to make the l
On Apr 1, 2:11 pm, "Eduardo O. Padoan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 3:57 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Apr 1, 12:47 pm, "Gabriel Genellina" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > > En Tue, 01 Apr 2008 13:57:55 -0300, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
>
> > > > On Mar 31,
On Apr 1, 12:47 pm, "Gabriel Genellina" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> En Tue, 01 Apr 2008 13:57:55 -0300, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
>
> > On Mar 31, 1:36 pm, "Gabriel Genellina" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
>
> >> Don't be scared by the "backwards incompatible" tag - it's the way to
> >> get
On Mar 31, 1:36 pm, "Gabriel Genellina" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Don't be scared by the "backwards incompatible" tag - it's the way to get
> rid of nasty things that could not be dropped otherwise.
I would consider breaking production code to be "nasty" as well.
--
http://mail.python.org/m
On Mar 16, 2:43 pm, Robert Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mar 16, 12:38 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > On Mar 16, 6:10 am, Bruce Eckel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > I think a lot of people have been caught up in the idea that we need
> > > to commercialize Python, and ride some kind
On Mar 16, 6:10 am, Bruce Eckel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think a lot of people have been caught up in the idea that we need
> to commercialize Python, and ride some kind of wave of publicity the
> way that Java and C# and Rails seem to have done.
This coming from someone who caught the Java
16 matches
Mail list logo
