Re: Are those features still the same?

2010-07-25 Thread francogrex
Terry Reedy wrote: >As other have said, mostly, but I would change the following... Thanks for all those who replied. I know these are not all the features but some of them and again this is not a comparison but a little taste of what python offers today, and the replies were very informative. B

Are those features still the same?

2010-07-24 Thread francogrex
Hi, I'm not a Python programmer but I'm interested in it and I found this table from Norvig that dates for some years (I re-posted it temporarily on my site below to take it out of context a little). I'm not interested in any comparisons only in the Python features ( last column), can someone

Re: C interpreter in Lisp/scheme/python

2010-07-24 Thread francogrex
In article , gneun...@comcast.net says... >I don't think it's accurate to say that [some] experts really "scorn" >newbies, but I do agree that newbies are occasionally mistreated. > >One thing newbies have to realize is that on Usenet you are quite >likely to be talking to people who were there

Re: C interpreter in Lisp/scheme/python

2010-07-23 Thread francogrex
In article <16a7e301-2e85-47eb-971e-79acc4e07...@b35g2000yqi. googlegroups.com>, gnuist...@gmail.com says... >This makes some sense. He replied on the newsgroup in a lengthy post >that there are sufficient resources out there giving hint that no one >need help me out. Then I was called "lazy" in