Yingjie Lan writes:
> Have you considered line continuation by indentation? It seems to
> meet the design principle. I think it is the most natural way to
> allow free line breaking in Python.
Briefly, yes, and I think it would need a lot of tuning and probably
complex rules. Unlike statement
Guido van Rossum writes:
> On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 12:28 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull
> wrote:
> > Sure, but IIRC one design principle of Python is that the keyword that
> > denotes the syntax should be the first thing on the line,
[...]
> That's true for *statement
Gabriel AHTUNE writes:
> So can be done with this syntax:
>
> > x = firstpart * secondpart + #line breaks here
> > anotherpart + #continue
> > stillanother #continue on.
>
> after a "+" operator the line is clearly not finished yet.
Sure, but IIRC one design principle of Python is that
