> So all libraries written have to use the common subset, which - unless
> things are *removed*, which with python3 actually happened - is always
> the oldest interpreter. And if a feature goes away, they have to be
> rewritten with the then common subset.
you see that's the problem with py3. inst
> You are describing a lending library, which is not the only sort of
> library. My personal library doesn't do any of those things. It is just a
> room with shelves filled with books.
how i see is all libraries are libraries, for a personal library you
are the only customer and you are the manag
On Nov 12, 6:07 pm, "Diez B. Roggisch" wrote:
> > ok let me make it more clear..
> > forget how you use python now.. i am talking about __futuristic__
> > python programming.
>
> > there is no more python2.x or python3.x or python y.x releases. there
> > is only updates of python and standard libr
On Nov 12, 4:35 pm, "Diez B. Roggisch" wrote:
> Sriram Srinivasan schrieb:
>
>
>
> > On Nov 12, 3:56 pm, "Diez B. Roggisch" wrote:
> >> Sriram Srinivasan schrieb:
>
> >>> I guess why every programming language has some kind of a &#
On Nov 12, 3:56 pm, "Diez B. Roggisch" wrote:
> Sriram Srinivasan schrieb:
>
>
>
> > I guess why every programming language has some kind of a 'standard
> > library' built in within it.
> > In my view it must not be called as a 'library
On Nov 12, 3:56 pm, "Diez B. Roggisch" wrote:
> Sriram Srinivasan schrieb:
>
>
>
> > I guess why every programming language has some kind of a 'standard
> > library' built in within it.
> > In my view it must not be called as a 'library
I guess why every programming language has some kind of a 'standard
library' built in within it.
In my view it must not be called as a 'library' at all. what it does
is like a 'bunch of built-in programs ready-made to do stuff'.
Lets see what a 'library' does:
1. offers books for customers
1.1 l
