> You are describing a lending library, which is not the only sort of > library. My personal library doesn't do any of those things. It is just a > room with shelves filled with books.
how i see is all libraries are libraries, for a personal library you are the only customer and you are the management too.! > Words in English can have more than one meaning. Horses run, > refrigerators run, and even though they don't have either legs or motors, > programs run too. The argument that code libraries don't behave like > lending libraries won't get you anywhere. first this is not an argument at all...i clearly stated these were my imaginations cum ideas. > Since library features are tied closely to the features available in the > Python interpreter, the way to use library 2.5 is to use Python 2.5. You > *might* be able to use library 2.5 with Python 2.6 or 2.4; you absolutely > won't be able to use it with Python 1.5 or 3.1. i am not talking about the past..past were experiences! that the developers had and what is happening today *might be* another experience for the future. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
