d *down*load data to your phone or tablet.
If the devices are of comparable size and power, you aren't upping or
downing anything - you're just transferring data from one computer to
another. I suppose we could say "crossloading"?
--
Richard Heathfield
Email: rjh at cpax d
u must be an idiot, that's entirely up to you, but I would take it
as a personal favour if you could be an idiot *somewhere else*. If you
don't like GNU software, fine - don't use it. End of problem.
--
Richard Heathfield <http://www.cpax.org.uk>
Email: -http://www. +rjh@
&qu
d you even
> think about that?).
>
> Unfortunately one then also get responses from trolls, small kids,
> idiots, etc..
In my experience, mensanator doesn't usually behave trollishly.
Perhaps he's just rubbing you up the wrong way accidentally. It might
be worth it for both yo
n.
The gap between nought and one is much greater than the gap between
one and a thousand.
> It's like
> the difference between driving a car and designing one. You don't
> need an engineering degree to drive a car. :-)
Right. Nowadays, you need a degree in electronics ins
, so every book /should/
have an errata list - at least until such time as an author can
correct errors in already-sold books. That not every book does have
such a list is therefore of some concern.
--
Richard Heathfield <http://www.cpax.org.uk>
Email: -http://www. +rjh@
"Usenet is
But why should you have to?
>
> As opposed to...?
Something you can grep.
--
Richard Heathfield <http://www.cpax.org.uk>
Email: -http://www. +rjh@
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999
Sig line vacant - apply within
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
In , Richard Heathfield
wrote:
> In <7ku6jhf3a23e...@mid.individual.net>, osmium wrote:
>>
>> In some cultures, implying that someone is illiterate suggests "not
>> smart".
>
> I don't see that at all. Babies are illiterate. Nobody knows wheth
In <7ku6jhf3a23e...@mid.individual.net>, osmium wrote:
> "Richard Heathfield" wrote:
>
>>> if the OP had just been smarter.
>>
>> Er, no, I didn't have that in mind at all.
>
> In some cultures, implying that someone is illiterate sugges
In <7ktsj6f3bciq...@mid.individual.net>, osmium wrote:
> "Richard Heathfield" wrote:
>
>> A man who cannot express what he needs to express /without/
>> resorting to .pdf format is computer-illiterate.
>
> What format do you suggest?
Firstly, I want to
larly enjoy relying on proprietary non-text
formats, however, is not crippled, just cautious.
A man who cannot express what he needs to express /without/ resorting
to .pdf format is computer-illiterate.
--
Richard Heathfield <http://www.cpax.org.uk>
Email: -http://www. +rjh@
"Usenet is a
http://preview.tinyurl.com/progintro
>>
>> Cheers,
>
> Why is chapter 2 called "ASD"?
Presumably its subtitle is "Introducing UPPER CASE".
--
Richard Heathfield <http://www.cpax.org.uk>
Email: -http://www. +rjh@
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999
Sig line vacant - apply within
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
7;s parallel comment along similar lines, and Jon
Clements's reply - which appears to solve the problem, albeit in a
semi-proprietary way. So I'm not asking for a solutio, just adding my
vote for "let's try to keep the Web as open to everyone as we can".
--
Richard Heat
one by one.
Tigers appear only to be able to move orthogonally (up/down/left/right) -
although they can use the horn to whizz across the chest (e.g. CHEST-1 to
HORN, HORN to CHEST-4, in two moves).
The rest of the rules are beyond me, I'm afraid. It's not clear how tigers
eat goats o
[comp.programming added, and followups set to that group]
v4vijayakumar said:
> On Apr 14, 12:35 pm, Richard Heathfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> v4vijayakumar said:
>> > In computer based, two player, board games, how to make computer play?
>>
>> Wri
a no-brainer: 13,7 and 8,7 is
far and away the best move.
> I know this is kind of off-topic here. Please redirect me, if there
> are more appropriate newsgroup.
comp.programming is probably where you want to be, at least to start off
with.
--
Richard Heathfield <http://www.cpax.o
pecialist in the field. When I talk about GMT, I mean GMT,
not UTC. Therefore, I am a counter-example to your claim.
--
Richard Heathfield <http://www.cpax.org.uk>
Email: -www. +rjh@
Google users: <http://www.cpax.org.uk/prg/writings/googly.php>
"Usenet is a strange place" -
Peter J. Holzer said:
> On 2007-07-03 08:57, Richard Heathfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Paul Rubin said:
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>>>> As for the primacy of UTC vs. TAI, this is the classical chicken
>>>> and
>>>> egg p
cognised only by some well-educated
people, and there are precious few of those), so why not use it?
I always leave my PC's clock set to GMT, partly out of this desire to
support a single timestamp standard, and (it must be said) partly out
of general cussedness.
--
Richard Heathfield <
18 matches
Mail list logo