Re: Jobs: Lisp and Python programmers wanted in the LA area

2007-02-28 Thread Ray Dillinger
> Actually, it just occurred to me that the company location was also in > the subject line of this thread ;-) D'oh! Should have looked at the verbose header before responding. I've got my newsreader set to display one title per line, and then didn't give it enough horizontal room to see your f

Re: Jobs: Lisp and Python programmers wanted in the LA area

2007-02-26 Thread Ray Dillinger
Tech HR wrote: > But we're a very young company (barely six months old at this point) so > we're willing to listen to most anything at this point. (We're using > Darcs for revision control. Haskell, anyone?) Tell us, where you would expect an applicant for one or more of these jobs to live if

Re: check html file size

2005-10-05 Thread Ray Dillinger
Richard Gration wrote: > ... fucking ... fucking ... fucking ... fucking ... Fucking ... fucking > ... fucking My friend, you can learn to use a far richer vocabulary of obscenities. If your creative flow is blocked by the fear that you can't spell more dirty words correctly, you can dispel th

Re: What are OOP's Jargons and Complexities?

2005-06-01 Thread Ray Dillinger
Matthias Buelow wrote: > And btw., I haven't used Pascal in a dozen years but my latest info is > that Turbo Pascal still lives in the form of "Delphi" for the Windows > platform. Surely not "dead" as I understand it. There's also FreePascal, which compiles approximately the same language as Tur

Re: What are OOP's Jargons and Complexities?

2005-05-25 Thread Ray Dillinger
Wibble wrote: > Thats how common lisp specifies a vector. > > Andreas, your link indicates that lisp is a Weakly typed language not > strong. Theres no compile time type semantics, at least in CommonLisp, > MacLisp, ZetaLisp or FranzLisp. > > (setq foo #(1 2 3)) > (setq foo 1) > (setq foo "Whate