RE: Number of languages known [was Re: Python is readable] - somewhat OT

2012-04-03 Thread Phil Runciman
ts and culture that we do not recognize in ourselves." Wikipedia. The process of eliciting tacit knowledge may be time consuming and require patience and skill. The following book covers aspects of this: Nonaka, Ikujiro; Takeuchi, Hirotaka (1995), The knowledge creating company: how Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Phil Runciman -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

RE: Number of languages known [was Re: Python is readable] - somewhat OT

2012-04-03 Thread Phil Runciman
llowed by machine code, using a piece of software for this purpose. This all sounds rather similar to Mark's situation. The reason however is less obvious. On the H16 series we did not have a multi-access O/S and the process of assembling and linking a large system involved many steps. Often the modifications required were trivial. It was generally easier to reload a memory dump from off paper tape and then apply the patches. Phil Runciman -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

RE: The devolution of English language and slothful c.l.p behaviours exposed!

2012-01-24 Thread Phil Runciman
now because the impending avalanche of bookings out for modification may take them by surprise, especially the number of requests from the North America and Australia. Here in New Zealand, they gave up attempting to use correct English years ago. Phil Runciman > -Original Message- >

Stack Architecture - was "Good books in computer science?"

2011-10-24 Thread Phil Runciman
This was part of an earlier discussion in this forum. I want to correct the impression created by Lawrence D'Oliveiro that those who implemented stacks were not designing for efficiency. > What I can say is that for scientific/engineering calculations the RPN of > KDF9 was Great because assemble

RE: A Bug By Any Other Name ...

2009-07-07 Thread Phil Runciman
-Original Message- From: Dennis Lee Bieber [mailto:wlfr...@ix.netcom.com] Sent: Tuesday, 7 July 2009 4:45 p.m. To: python-list@python.org Subject: Re: A Bug By Any Other Name ... On Mon, 6 Jul 2009 19:48:39 -0700, Daniel Fetchinson declaimed the following in gmane.comp.python.general:

RE: Good books in computer science?

2009-06-22 Thread Phil Runciman
A big yes to Scott's remarks. The first law of programming is: "Write as you would be written unto". Apologies to Kingsley. Phil -Original Message- From: Scott David Daniels [mailto:scott.dani...@acm.org] Sent: Tuesday, 23 June 2009 7:14 a.m. To: python-list@python.org Subject: Re: Go

RE: RE: Good books in computer science?

2009-06-21 Thread Phil Runciman
->From: Bob Martin [mailto:bob.mar...@excite.com] -.Sent: Thursday, 18 June 2009 6:07 p.m. -Subject: Re: RE: Good books in computer science? -in 117815 20090617 221804 Phil Runciman wrote: ->Because it reminds me of when things went badly wrong. IBM360, Von Neumann = ->architecture, no

RE: Good books in computer science?

2009-06-17 Thread Phil Runciman
: Lawrence D'Oliveiro [mailto:l...@geek-central.gen.new_zealand] Sent: Wednesday, 17 June 2009 5:50 p.m. To: python-list@python.org Subject: RE: Good books in computer science? In message , Phil Runciman wrote: > FWIW I actually dislike this book! Why? -- http://mail.python.org

FW: Good books in computer science?

2009-06-15 Thread Phil Runciman
Oh dear the "latter" referred to VME/K but got lost in my editing. Sorry about that. Phil > -Original Message- > From: Phil Runciman > Sent: Tuesday, 16 June 2009 4:26 p.m. > To: python-list@python.org > Subject: RE: Good books in computer science? > > FW

RE: Good books in computer science?

2009-06-15 Thread Phil Runciman
FWIW I actually dislike this book! Gasp... Much of the material is excellent but IBM got into the huge mess with the 360. Brooks observed failure from the inside and IMHO did a great job of it. Project managers can never rescue stuffed concepts especially if a lot of money has been spent! Such

RE: Good books in computer science?

2009-06-14 Thread Phil Runciman
>Rhodri James wrote: >> On Sun, 14 Jun 2009 14:19:13 +0100, Graham Ashton >> wrote: >> >>> On 2009-06-14 14:04:02 +0100, Steven D'Aprano >>> said: >>> Nathan Stoddard wrote: > The best way to become a good programmer is to program. Write a lot of > code; work on some large p

RE: which database is suitable for small applications

2009-06-01 Thread Phil Runciman
Hi Lawrence, I appreciate your remarks. However database engines cache their table/views to support sequential accessing within a set. With a good accessing scheme and with enough cache memory you will have all your small tables in memory. So the simplest thing is let the DBMS do its thing. Th

RE: game engine (as in rules not graphics)

2008-12-28 Thread Phil Runciman
See: Chris Moss, Prolog++: The Power of Object-Oriented and Logic Programming (ISBN 0201565072) This book is a pretty handy intro to an OO version Prolog produced by Logic Programming Associates. Prolog is a wonderful tool for such things as working out a factory layout for new car producti

RE: The Importance of Terminology's Quality

2008-08-26 Thread Phil Runciman
* but in fixed point hardware it all got a bit convoluted. Phil (KDF9 Fan) -Original Message- From: Phil Runciman Sent: Friday, 22 August 2008 8:32 a.m. To: python-list@python.org Subject: RE: The Importance of Terminology's Quality >On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 02:36:39 +, s

RE: The Importance of Terminology's Quality

2008-08-25 Thread Phil Runciman
>On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 02:36:39 +, sln wrote: >>>Whats os interresting about all this hullabaloo is that nobody has coded >>>machine code here, and know's squat about it. >>> >>>I'm not talking assembly language. Don't you know that there are >>>routines that program machine code? Yes, burned

RE: Python Written in C?

2008-07-21 Thread Phil Runciman
On 20 jul, 19:50, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I'm just learning about Python now and it sounds interesting. But I > just read (on the Wiki page) that mainstream Python was written in C. > That's what I was searching for: Python was written in what other > language? > > See, my concern was somethi

FW: php vs python

2008-05-28 Thread Phil Runciman
-Original Message- From: Jerry Stuckle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, 28 May 2008 1:48 p.m. To: python-list@python.org Subject: Re: php vs python Ivan Illarionov wrote: > On Wed, 28 May 2008 05:10:20 +0400, AnrDaemon wrote: > >> Greetings, Ivan Illarionov. >> In reply to Yo

RE: S2K DTS and Python

2007-07-11 Thread Phil Runciman
-Original Message- From: stefaan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, 11 July 2007 6:47 a.m. To: python-list@python.org Subject: Re: S2K DTS and Python > > However, I now want to update some tables in MSAccess, and it occurred >

RE: S2K DTS and Python

2007-07-11 Thread Phil Runciman
-Original Message- From: stefaan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, 11 July 2007 6:47 a.m. To: python-list@python.org Subject: Re: S2K DTS and Python > > However, I now want to update some tables in MSAccess, and it occurred

RE: S2K DTS and Python

2007-07-11 Thread Phil Runciman
-Original Message- From: Tim Golden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, 10 July 2007 7:58 p.m. Cc: python-list@python.org Subject: Re: S2K DTS and Python Phil Runciman wrote: > I am a Python newbie so please be gentle on me.

S2K DTS and Python

2007-07-09 Thread Phil Runciman
Hi All, I am a Python newbie so please be gentle on me. I have created a program that takes text files within a directory and it successfully parses the information from them to create 3 CSV files. However, I now want to update some tables in MSAccess, and it occurred to me that becaus