On Saturday, April 17, 2021 at 11:12:38 PM UTC+10, Paul Edwards wrote:
> https://github.com/s390guy/SATK/commits/master/README
>
> and I can see that on 2014-08-13 he cited 3.3 as an
> explicit requirement.
Note that the work I was doing to make a C90-compliant
version of Pytho
On Saturday, April 17, 2021 at 8:12:52 PM UTC+10, jak wrote:
> I looked at the "asma" folder and noticed that some files were touched 6
> years ago. I could deduce from this that the authors might have an older
> version, perhaps developed for an older version of python, probably for
> the 2.x
On Saturday, April 17, 2021 at 2:37:23 PM UTC+10, Dan Stromberg wrote:
> > I want to produce EBCDIC executables that run on a
> > S/3X0 (or z/Arch) machine (even if I personally do
> > that via emulation).
> >
> I thought EBCDIC was analogous to ASCII?
EBCDIC is an alternative to ASCII. E.g.
On Saturday, April 17, 2021 at 7:52:07 AM UTC+10, jak wrote:
> one thing is not clear to me, do you absolutely need to use "asma"?
>
> http://www.z390.org/
I forgot to mention that it also requires Java. So instead
of porting Python to the S/3X0 I would need to port
Java.
Note that Java (and P
On Saturday, April 17, 2021 at 7:52:07 AM UTC+10, jak wrote:
> Hi,
> one thing is not clear to me, do you absolutely need to use "asma"?
>
> http://www.z390.org/
The link you provided is to something that runs on PC
environments.
I want to produce EBCDIC executables that run on a
S/3X0 (or z/
On Saturday, April 17, 2021 at 6:18:29 AM UTC+10, Dan Stromberg wrote:
> If asma runs there, it'd suggest you might do well to port micropython to
> PDOS instead.
>
> Micropython has the dual benefits of being small and being supported.
> CPython 3.3 doesn't even get security fixes anymore.
O
On Saturday, April 17, 2021 at 5:13:31 AM UTC+10, Paul Rubin wrote:
> Paul Edwards writes:
> > I have succeeded in producing a Python 3.3 executable despite being
> > built with a C library that only supports C90.
> It seems to me that you might have an easier time porting M
On Wednesday, April 14, 2021 at 8:35:59 PM UTC+10, Paul Edwards wrote:
> ImportError: importlib requires posix or nt
> but I don't know what it needs to satisfy that.
>
> It's a bit strange that it can only be posix or nt when VMS is supported in
> 3.3 too.
The r
On Thursday, April 15, 2021 at 4:32:51 AM UTC+10, Alan Gauld wrote:
> On 14/04/2021 11:35, Paul Edwards wrote:
> > I have succeeded in producing a Python 3.3 executable
> ...
> > However, the executable doesn't work yet.
> Late to this party but how big is the assembl
I have succeeded in producing a Python 3.3 executable
despite being built with a C library that only supports
C90. I had to provide my own mini-posix wrappers that
convert open() into fopen() etc.
With that in place, plus a compiler where char = wchar_t,
there were not a lot of changes required to
On Wednesday, March 24, 2021 at 11:07:48 PM UTC+11, Christian Heimes wrote:
> > "long long" is not C90. I don't have support for that. The
> > "i370" target of GCC 3.2.3 doesn't have DI instructions
> > working. Just 32 bits. Everything is 32 bits.
> Which version of Python are you using as bas
On Wednesday, March 24, 2021 at 1:02:48 AM UTC+11, Chris Angelico wrote:
> > ../Objects/exceptions.c:2538: `ECONNREFUSED' undeclared (first use in this
> > function)
> >
> Ah, this sounds like an issue with your lower-level networking
> support. Does PDOS have BSD sockets? Does it have WinSock?
On Tuesday, March 23, 2021 at 10:19:46 PM UTC+11, Paul Edwards wrote:
> Objects/exceptions.c: ADD_ERRNO(ConnectionRefusedError, ECONNREFUSED);
>
> Those errno are non-standard (non-C90) and I assume
> other platforms can't cope with that either. But I can't
> se
On Tuesday, March 23, 2021 at 10:19:46 PM UTC+11, Paul Edwards wrote:
> My latest problem is this:
>
> Objects/exceptions.c: ADD_ERRNO(ConnectionRefusedError, ECONNREFUSED);
Sorry, I forgot to include the actual error:
../Objects/exceptions.c:2538: `ECONNREFUSED' undeclared (fir
On Tuesday, March 23, 2021 at 9:44:03 PM UTC+11, Gisle Vanem wrote:
> Why not try to port MicroPython instead? Much lighter.
> I've ported it to MSDOS/djgpp with some success.
Thanks for the tip. I don't actually need it to be
light. I just need it to be C90-compliant.
The assembler I mentioned
Hello. I have a new operating system called PDOS
which works on both PC and mainframe, which
can be found here:
http://pdos.sourceforge.net/
I know nothing about Python, my focus is on C90,
but I wish to run this mainframe assembler, asma,
which was written in Python, not C:
https://github.com/s
16 matches
Mail list logo
