On Saturday, April 17, 2021 at 5:13:31 AM UTC+10, Paul Rubin wrote: > Paul Edwards <muta...@gmail.com> writes: > > I have succeeded in producing a Python 3.3 executable despite being > > built with a C library that only supports C90.
> It seems to me that you might have an easier time porting MicroPython > than CPython, if MicroPython fills your requirements. The documentation for "asma" says it requires Python 3.3 or above, and I have no idea how accurate that claim is. I'll only know whether *my* flavor of Python 3.3 is good enough for "asma" when I reach that point. BFN. Paul. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
