Stefan Behnel wrote:
Les Schaffer, 16.07.2010 15:07:
agree with all the other suggestions: multiple threads for data and GUI,
The way I read it, the suggestion was to use separate processes, not
multiple threads. That's a pretty important difference.
check. processes, not threads.
thanks to all for the replies.
the Windows memory fragmentation was one of the "i didn't know that"
items. we will use 64-bit Windows OS if the job happens.
agree with all the other suggestions: multiple threads for data and GUI,
etc. Also, might push for Linux even though the company is Wind
i have been asked to guarantee that a proposed Python application will
run continuously under MS Windows for two months time. And i am looking
to know what i don't know.
The app would read instrument data from a serial port, store the data in
file, and display in matplotlib. typical sampling
Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
The OP: "I use Ubuntu 64 bit"
woops, my bad ...
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Jimoid wrote:
I use Ubuntu 64 bit and need to develop a programme (ideally in
Python) to work on data that is contained in a Microsoft Access 2003
database. I do not need to modify the database, simply read a few
columns of data from some tables.
this worked like a charm for me:
http://code.a
and security, we might be able to manage a small
consulting gig. but if its not python-relevant, lets talk offlist. in
any case, many thanks.
Les Schaffer
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
process scheme. if so, this is
good enough for now. think we'll use this for the mysql password too.
> the secret text will be visible in memory during the subprocess call,
> but it won't linger around once the for-loop has finished.
good enough for current rock and roll.
>
; buggy C code referencing freed memory.
i liked the other Tim's suggestion of a secure string ;-)
Les Schaffer
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
ies a digital signature, and
also encrypted identifying information for the user.
Les Schaffer
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
me there is some probability of being overwritten, no? and i am
curious how that works. it sounds like you are saying once a string,
always the same string, in python. if thats true, i am glad i know that.
Les Schaffer
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
xceed the OMB's latest on laptop security:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/memoranda/fy2006/m06-16.pdf
i don't see a mention of swap files on there, but maybe i missed it. and
the OMB doc exceeds the security level required by the client app.
les schaffer
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
passphrase
string(s), eventually it gets garbage collected and the memory recycled.
so "before long" the phrase is gone from memory.
is there a best practice way to do this?
thanks
Les Schaffer
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Les Schaffer wrote:
> errr, THIS GPG module: http://www.historical-id.info/files/python/GPG.py
sigh, actually its updated version:
http://trac.t7a.org/isconf/browser/trunk/lib/python/isconf/GPG.py
looks like i can use the subprocess module straight instead of the
PopenHI, except for
Les Schaffer wrote:
> Does anyone know if the GPG.py module
errr, THIS GPG module: http://www.historical-id.info/files/python/GPG.py
Les
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
ask here first.
Thanks
Les Schaffer
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
15 matches
Mail list logo