On Sep 26, 12:25 am, "Gabriel Genellina" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> En Tue, 25 Sep 2007 22:41:31 -0300,KenKuhlman<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> escribi?:
>
> > Replying to myself in case someone finds this interesting.
>
> > Anyway, I took another shot at this with a little fresher mind, and it
> > was qu
Replying to myself in case someone finds this interesting.
Anyway, I took another shot at this with a little fresher mind, and it
was quickly obvious that I was trying to force attributes to behave
more like classes. It was a small step from there to creating a
factory function to return instance
Thanks for the response! It was just the kick I needed to realize
that I was letting my frustration get the best of me and that I was
going down a dead-end. I blame the fact that I was coding on little
sleep :-)
I went with the solution of giving a naming convention to the
docstrings and relyin
What's the best method for annotating attributes with a docstring?
I'm looking to be able to introspect my class & get the comments back
out.
The technique I'm using is a little hoaky, but works.. basically I
create subclasses of the builtin types that I want to be able to use &
then instantiate
