Am 26.02.2011 12:26, schrieb J. Gerlach:
> Am 24.02.2011 17:19, schrieb s...@uce.gov:
>>
>> Is there a better way to convert int to bytes then going through strings:
>>
>> x=5
>> str(x).encode()
>>
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
> >>>
Am 24.02.2011 17:19, schrieb s...@uce.gov:
>
> Is there a better way to convert int to bytes then going through strings:
>
> x=5
> str(x).encode()
>
>
> Thanks.
>
>>> bytes([8])
b'\x08'
seems more straight forward...
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Am 21.02.2011 16:04, schrieb Luther:
> I've tried installing pygtk, pygobject, and gobject-introspection from
> source, but none of them will compile, and nothing I install through
> synaptic has any effect.
>
> I've tried too many things to post all the details here, but I'll post
> any details o
Am 08.12.2010 03:23, schrieb Yingjie Lan:
> Hi,
>
> According to the doc, group(0) is the entire match.
>
m = re.match(r"(\w+) (\w+)", "Isaac Newton, physicist")
m.group(0) # The entire match 'Isaac Newton'
>
> But if you do this:
import re
re.sub(r'(\d{3})(\d{3})', r'\0 t
Am 29.11.2010 14:50, schrieb Thomas Guettler:
> Hi,
>
> I think it would be nice if you could use the hashlib in one line:
>
> hashlib.sha256().update('abc').hexdigest()
>
> Unfortunately update() returns None.
>
> Is there a way to convert a string to the hexdigest of sha256 in one line?
>
>
Am 06.11.2010 02:36, schrieb Steven D'Aprano:
> On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 14:19:47 +0100, J. Gerlach wrote:
>
>> Am 28.10.2010 03:40, schrieb Steven D'Aprano:
>>> [ snip a lot of wise words ]
>>
>> Can I put this (translated) in the german python wiki? I guess
Am 28.10.2010 03:40, schrieb Steven D'Aprano:
> [ snip a lot of wise words ]
Can I put this (translated) in the german python wiki?
I guess it might help more people to understand some decisions taken
during python's development - and I'm to lazy to do something similar
myself ;)
Greetings from B
Am 13.10.2010 14:26, schrieb Jon Clements:
> On 12 Oct, 20:21, "J. Gerlach" wrote:
>> Am 12.10.2010 17:10, schrieb Roy Smith:
>>
>>> [A]re there any plans to update the api to allow an iterable instead of
>>> a sequence?
>>
>> [sqlite3 exampl
Am 12.10.2010 17:10, schrieb Roy Smith:
> [A]re there any plans to update the api to allow an iterable instead of
> a sequence?
sqlite3 (standard library, python 2.6.6., Windows 32Bit) does that already::
import sqlite3 as sql
connection = sql.connect(":memory:")
cursor = connection.execute(""
