Am 06.11.2010 02:36, schrieb Steven D'Aprano: > On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 14:19:47 +0100, J. Gerlach wrote: > >> Am 28.10.2010 03:40, schrieb Steven D'Aprano: >>> [ snip a lot of wise words ] >> >> Can I put this (translated) in the german python wiki? I guess it might >> help more people to understand some decisions taken during python's >> development - and I'm to lazy to do something similar myself ;) > > > Sure, go ahead. > > I would appreciate a link back to my post, and/or credit, but that's not > essential. (I understand it's a wiki and there's no guarantee that the > link will remain there forever.) > > Thank you, and of course I gave you credit. I linked back to your post via googlegroups. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
- Re: Why "flat is better than nested&... Seebs
- Re: Why "flat is better than nested&... Steve Holden
- Re: Why "flat is better than nes... Robin Becker
- Re: Why "flat is better than nested&... kj
- Re: Why "flat is better than nes... Steve Holden
- Re: Why "flat is better than nes... kj
- Re: Why "flat is better than nes... Steven D'Aprano
- Re: Why "flat is better than nes... rantingrick
- Re: Why "flat is better than nes... J. Gerlach
- Re: Why "flat is better than nes... Steven D'Aprano
- Re: Why "flat is better than nes... J. Gerlach
- Re: Why "flat is better than nested"... Lie Ryan
- Re: Why "flat is better than nested"... nn
- Re: Why "flat is better than nested"? rustom
- Re: Why "flat is better than nested"... Peter Otten
- Re: Why "flat is better than nested"... Lawrence D'Oliveiro
- Re: Why "flat is better than nested&... Gregory Ewing
- Re: Why "flat is better than nes... John Posner
- Re: Why "flat is better than nes... alex23
- Re: Why "flat is better than nested"? Ben Finney