>> And as far as I know pkg-config is used by python's configure script
>> so everything should be fine. I also set
>> LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/fetch/opt/lib:/home/fetch/opt/lib64 and also
>> C_INCLUDE_PATH=/home/fetch/opt/include
>
> I looked into this a little. I found that setting C_INCLUDE_PATH as
On 12/20/18, Fetchinson . wrote:
> Hi all, I'm trying to build 3.7.1 from source and having trouble with
> libffi and _ctypes. I'm on linux and have installed libffi also from
> source to a custom location:
>
> $HOME/opt/lib64/libffi.so.6.0.4
> $HOME/opt/lib64/libffi.a
> $HOME/opt/lib64/libffi.la
Hi all, I'm trying to build 3.7.1 from source and having trouble with
libffi and _ctypes. I'm on linux and have installed libffi also from
source to a custom location:
$HOME/opt/lib64/libffi.so.6.0.4
$HOME/opt/lib64/libffi.a
$HOME/opt/lib64/libffi.la
$HOME/opt/lib64/libffi.so.6
$HOME/opt/lib64/lib
On 10/1/18, Roel Schroeven wrote:
> jkn schreef op 1/10/2018 om 20:25:
>> On Monday, October 1, 2018 at 6:57:30 PM UTC+1, Ethan Furman wrote:
>>> On 09/30/2018 09:30 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>>>
Notwithstanding Ethan's comment about having posted the suspension
notice
on the list,
On 9/24/18, Thomas Jollans wrote:
> On 2018-09-24 16:30, Fetchinson . via Python-list wrote:
>> [fetch@fetch]$ grep LIBFFI_INCLUDE Makefile
>> LIBFFI_INCLUDEDIR= /opt/custom/lib/libffi-3.2.1/include
>>
>> So I'd say everything should work but it doesn't,
On 9/24/18, Thomas Jollans wrote:
> On 2018-09-24 14:14, Fetchinson . via Python-list wrote:
>>>> I'm trying to compile python 3.7.0 from source with a custom libffi
>>>> path and the compiler/linker doesn't seem to pick up the right
>>>> versio
>> I'm trying to compile python 3.7.0 from source with a custom libffi
>> path and the compiler/linker doesn't seem to pick up the right
>> version. The system libffi doesn't have the development files so I've
>> installed the latest libffi (also from source) to /opt/custom but
>> still I get
>>
>>
I'm trying to compile python 3.7.0 from source with a custom libffi
path and the compiler/linker doesn't seem to pick up the right
version. The system libffi doesn't have the development files so I've
installed the latest libffi (also from source) to /opt/custom but
still I get
INFO: Could not loc
On 8/8/18, Christian Heimes wrote:
> On 2018-08-08 00:07, Fetchinson . via Python-list wrote:
>> The highest version of openssl available on my system is 1.0.0 which
>> is not good enough for pip these days (or github for that matter). So
>> I've installed 1.1.0 to a c
The highest version of openssl available on my system is 1.0.0 which
is not good enough for pip these days (or github for that matter). So
I've installed 1.1.0 to a custom location /home/fetch/opt. But if I do
import ssl
ssl.OPENSSL_VERSION
it still shows me that it is using the system default 1.
On 10/5/17, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 8:06 AM, Fetchinson . via Python-list
> wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> I have a rather simple program which cycles through a bunch of files,
>> does some operation on them, and then quits. There are 500 files
Hi folks,
I have a rather simple program which cycles through a bunch of files,
does some operation on them, and then quits. There are 500 files
involved and each operation takes about 5-10 MB of memory. As you'll
see I tried to make every attempt at removing everything at the end of
each cycle so
On 9/7/17, Thomas Jollans wrote:
> On 2017-09-06 16:14, Fetchinson . via Python-list wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> I'm trying to install a binary package (tensorflow) which contains
>> some binary C extensions. Now my system glibc is 2.15 but the binaries
>
Hi folks,
I'm trying to install a binary package (tensorflow) which contains
some binary C extensions. Now my system glibc is 2.15 but the binaries
in the C extensions were created (apparently) with glibc 2.17. So I
thought no problemo I installed glibc 2.17 to a custom location, built
python2.7 f
On 4/30/16, Gordon Levi wrote:
> "Fetchinson ." wrote:
>
>>Hi folks,
>>
>>I have a very specific set of requirements for a task and was
>>wondering if anyone had good suggestions for the best set of tools:
>>
>>* store text documents (about 10 pages)
>>* the data set is static (i.e. only look
Hi folks,
I have a very specific set of requirements for a task and was
wondering if anyone had good suggestions for the best set of tools:
* store text documents (about 10 pages)
* the data set is static (i.e. only lookups are performed, no delete,
no edit, no addition)
* only one operation
16 matches
Mail list logo
