Hi Christopher,
On 20.05.2016 20:50, Christopher Reimer wrote:
Greetings,
My chess engine has a Piece class with the following methods that use
the @property decorator to read and write the position value.
slightly off topic: is your chess engine available in a public repo somewhere? I think
Hi Michael,
and thanks a lot for chiming in on this topic.
On 13.05.2016 22:33, Michael Selik wrote:
[...]
I share Greg's trepidation when I hear a phrase like that, but the general
idea of a registry of classes or functions and then picking the right one
based on string input is fine.
S
Hi Ervin,
On 16.05.2016 11:05, Ervin Hegedüs wrote:
Hi All,
there is a library, which written in C. I'ld like to use it from
Python - from Python 2 _and_ 3.
I can make the autotools* files for Python 2 and Python 3, but
only exclusively. I can't make it for both in same time.
[...]
Is there
Hello Dieter,
Am 13.05.2016 um 09:21 schrieb dieter:
Dirk Bächle writes:
...
My questions
- Is this a good approach, that I could use for other parts of the architecture
as well, e.g. the Node class mentioned above?
You might look at the "adpater" pattern.
It is he
Hi Gregory,
thanks a lot for your answer and comments.
Am 13.05.2016 um 08:35 schrieb Gregory Ewing:
Dirk Bächle wrote:
[...]
I'd even suggest that *all* of the build logic should be in
the Nodes, and the Taskmaster class shouldn't exist at all.
The top level logic should just tell
Hi Marko,
Am 13.05.2016 um 07:53 schrieb Marko Rauhamaa:
Dirk Bächle :
For example, why do you need a key? Couldn't you simply pass the task
master class as an argument?
The idea behind this is, to be able to select classes by giving a
parameter on the command-line. So at some po
Hi Marko,
thank you very much for your quick reply.
On 13.05.2016 00:01, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
[...]
- Is this a good approach
As an approach, that looks ok. The code looks a bit too lenient, though,
which can easily surprise and baffle the user. I think it would be
better to fail:
===
Hi there,
I'm one of the SCons (http://www.scons.org) developers and am working on a partial redesign of our architecture. I'd like to come up
with a decent proposal about how to extend and rewrite our code base, such that it's easier for a user to overload and replace some
parts of the functio
