Hi Marko,
Am 13.05.2016 um 07:53 schrieb Marko Rauhamaa:
Dirk Bächle <tshor...@gmx.de>:
For example, why do you need a key? Couldn't you simply pass the task
master class as an argument?
The idea behind this is, to be able to select classes by giving a
parameter on the command-line. So at some point a translation from a
given "key" to its actual class has to happen, I guess.
I see. So are the task masters interchangeable? I would have imagined
they would modify the default operational semantics. If so, the task
manager should be fixed programmatically in the SConstruct file.
yes, I'd like to be able to replace Taskmasters as well. For example, switching from the "default" file-oriented taskmaster, to one
that also supports pseudo targets (always run) like in "make" or "aqualid".
After all, we're mainly a "build framework"...so supporting different approaches to a
given "build process" makes sense to me.
Apart from that, it's basically just an example of what I'm trying to achieve. To which classes in our architecture the idiom is
actually applied, is left as a decision that is made sometime later.
Dirk
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
