Well, its kind of obvious to make a skeleton, copy it in for some basic
functionality and modularly ( is that a word ? ) manage each piece.
That ( like your example ) is fine stuff.
As a side note, I am sure large, large highly generalised programs are pretty
hard to make.
One thing I do is
I am not specifically having any problems implementing what I want to make work.
Callbacks etc make it fairly easy to make TKinter react to things without any
specific fancy plan for it.
Add callbacks for real time changes early in any new notion, after it looks
right go to the IO part make i
If you have a problem,. ask a super specific question, here. If I can help, I
will, but TKINTER knowledge is pretty spread around. Many others migth jump in,
too.
Its works, its slightly quirky, has no licencing hangups.
X11 makes fine fine programs !
Keep hacking,Dan
--
https://mail.python.or
Hi,
I've write a huge biotech program ( an IDE for synthetic biology ), and am
slowly outgrowing TKINTER.
Has anybody out there merged a little bit of TCL direct calls from Python 3.X
to get more freedom then TKINTER for just some Windows ?
How about bold stories of successes ( yours, not mine
Why do we tolerate this spam ?
this seems most likely a way to inject viruses into people's workflow.
That wiped out usenet. Ahh without an explaination; ( and it woudl have to be a
good one ); what is the purpsoe of this, why is it here ?
Can it be eliminated ?
Regards,
Dan
--
https://mail.p
On Tuesday, May 30, 2023 at 1:28:04 PM UTC-4, Rob Cliffe wrote:
> Thanks to everyone who replied. All replies were constructive, none
> were telling me to stop belly-aching.
Hi, Dan says:
When you get your style ideas sort of frozen, maybe you can poke up a sample
here.
Aworked example for yo
Editing text intended primarily for machine reading that involves metadata and
lower level facts is a horror show.
I sort of worked for a company years ago and a smart ass suggested I was making
labor for myself by doing changes to a scripting language for db users, maybe a
few hours a week. He
On Thursday, January 19, 2023 at 12:09:02 AM UTC-5, cameron wrote:
> I know this is vague. Once you find its stalling in a particular
> function (if it is) you may be able to run that function directly. Also,
> a print() at the top abd bottom/return of the stalling function. And so
> on.
Dan
Hello !
> Works fine on my work machine. (Ubuntu 20.04 / 32 G / 32 CPUS). Scalene
> (https://github.com/plasma-umass/scalene) shows it using 9 MB of memory.
> I ran your test program here and it generates 25 windows on my machine,
> and I can click "run" at least half a dozen times. I tried cl
gards,
Dan Kolis
# Code version 18Jan2023 19:48 EST Dan Kolis
# Click 'go' on main page. when run over and over after a while it freezes
import tkinter as tk
from tkinter import ttk
from tkinter import fontas luFont
# Empty object maker ( M T ) ... get
I have written a very sizable and elaborate program that uses tKinter for X11
displays of genomics.
Yet maybe 1 of 6 times it freezes, so I decided to extract the minimum that
works perfectly and add back big pieces. It does it both running .pyc and in
VSCode.
so even the most minor of odditie
Thank you
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
> I don't think you've described this. I don't know what you mean here.
When I trace it in VSCode the imports seem like they endlessly suspend scanning
and go to other ones over and over. Like "Whats this doing ?"
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Most of the time the newbie I visualize adding a function copies and pastes
maybe a screen of python and changes it a little, maybe 5% of the lines have a
xx. code so they rarely have to understand it, thats not the part of the
program there changing.
Also, I suffered long and hard for extreme
dn and Mats, thanks for your advice.
I'm not sure what to do. Do either / both know if there is a way to make it
parse each import list to bytecode in one shot ?? The hop around read keeps
making me worry it migth leave some memory leak or something.
I dont know.
Thanks though, both your di
This program has lots of files and each is well segregated for a concept.
the top of each as a heap of imports, all identical. Well the very top has some
one of's
import os asos
import sys as sys
import importlib as importlib
import d
I think it needs a built in viewer or at least a human readable output, or
nobody will go through the trouble to use it.
Other that that, maybe a pretty good idea, sure
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Its advice, I don't think the style issue is particularly important.
If you understand its meaning, it achieves my purpose. If you don't I you're
perhaps not a programmer...
I like the abruptness of technical writing as a style, actually. If that is how
machine learning ( aka 'A.I.' ) tends to
Using sys.stdout / is simply nonsense. The more I think about it, the more I
realise how bad it is.
Going on about it endlessly seems pointless.
If the even mini threading thing is turned on, now what ? some other module
eats the message intended for a different module ? A state machine with it
It's certainly not an "incredibly bad idea", it is a mildly bad idea however.
Why be stuck with maybe's and just text strings ?
Functions as "first class operators" and object oriented languages are a
natural pair with a bit of heavy thinking.
The problem is... there is nobody giving you a 3
In a module mostly for this purpose; ( big program means many modules aka files
):
--
globalIdeas.py
--
# Empty object maker ( M T ) ...
21 matches
Mail list logo
