Re: Python-based monads essay (Re: Assignment versus binding)

2016-10-11 Thread Anuradha Laxminarayan
On Sunday, 9 October 2016 13:18:32 UTC+5:30, Gregory Ewing wrote: > Here's the first part of the essay I said I'd write about > monads: > > http://www.cosc.canterbury.ac.nz/greg.ewing/essays/monads/DemystifyingMonads.html > > Hope it's useful, > Greg Thanks, that made a very interesting read.

Re: Assignment versus binding

2016-10-06 Thread Anuradha Laxminarayan
On Thursday, 6 October 2016 14:17:06 UTC+5:30, Gregory Ewing wrote: > Paul Rubin wrote: > > It's useful to write some Python things in monadic style, but monads > > make the most sense as type operators, which don't map onto Python that > > well. > > There probably isn't much point in using the

Re: Assignment versus binding

2016-10-05 Thread Anuradha Laxminarayan
On Wednesday, 5 October 2016 11:47:17 UTC+5:30, Gregory Ewing wrote: > Chris Angelico wrote: > > Seriously though... this ties in with the other issues about *purely* > > functional languages being rather impractical, and the purity > > generally being sullied some by things like monads (which I s

Re: Devanagari int literals [was Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed?]

2015-07-18 Thread Anuradha Laxminarayan
On Sunday, July 19, 2015 at 10:15:37 AM UTC+5:30, Steven D'Aprano wrote: > On Sun, 19 Jul 2015 01:52 pm, Rustom Mody wrote: > > > Not to mention actively hostile attitude to discussions that could at the > > moment be tangential to current CPython. See (and whole thread) > > https://mail.python.org