On 2024-03-08, Thomas Passin via Python-list wrote:
>
>> Hi, I tested this with Python 3.8. Good to know that this was fixed!
>
> We just learned a few posts back that it might be specific to Linux; I
> ran it on Windows.
On Linux, the limit is imposed by the filesystem. Most of the "real"
file
On 3/8/2024 5:14 PM, Albert-Jan Roskam wrote:
On Mar 8, 2024 19:35, Thomas Passin via Python-list
wrote:
On 3/8/2024 1:03 PM, Albert-Jan Roskam via Python-list wrote:
> Hi,
> I was replacing some os.path stuff with Pathlib and I
discovered this:
> Path(256
On Mar 8, 2024 19:35, Thomas Passin via Python-list
wrote:
On 3/8/2024 1:03 PM, Albert-Jan Roskam via Python-list wrote:
> Hi,
> I was replacing some os.path stuff with Pathlib and I discovered
this:
> Path(256 * "x").is_file() # OSError
> os.p
On Sat, 9 Mar 2024 at 03:42, Grant Edwards via Python-list
wrote:
>
> On 2024-03-08, Chris Angelico via Python-list wrote:
> > On Sat, 9 Mar 2024 at 00:51, Grant Edwards via Python-list
> > wrote:
> >
> >> One might argue that "global" isn't a good choice for what to call the
> >> scope in questi
On 3/8/2024 2:21 PM, Grant Edwards via Python-list wrote:
On 2024-03-08, Thomas Passin via Python-list wrote:
On 3/8/2024 1:03 PM, Albert-Jan Roskam via Python-list wrote:
Hi,
I was replacing some os.path stuff with Pathlib and I discovered this:
Path(256 * "x").is_file() # OSE
On 2024-03-08, Grant Edwards via Python-list wrote:
>> OSError: [Errno 36] File name too long:
>> 'x
On 2024-03-08, Grant Edwards via Python-list wrote:
> On 2024-03-08, Thomas Passin via Python-list wrote:
>> On 3/8/2024 1:03 PM, Albert-Jan Roskam via Python-list wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> I was replacing some os.path stuff with Pathlib and I discovered this:
>>> Path(256 * "x").is_file()
On 2024-03-08, Thomas Passin via Python-list wrote:
> On 3/8/2024 1:03 PM, Albert-Jan Roskam via Python-list wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I was replacing some os.path stuff with Pathlib and I discovered this:
>> Path(256 * "x").is_file() # OSError
>> os.path.isfile(256 * "x") # bool
>> I
On 3/8/2024 1:03 PM, Albert-Jan Roskam via Python-list wrote:
Hi,
I was replacing some os.path stuff with Pathlib and I discovered this:
Path(256 * "x").is_file() # OSError
os.path.isfile(256 * "x") # bool
Is this intended? Does pathlib try to resemble os.path as closely as
Hi,
I was replacing some os.path stuff with Pathlib and I discovered this:
Path(256 * "x").is_file() # OSError
os.path.isfile(256 * "x") # bool
Is this intended? Does pathlib try to resemble os.path as closely as
possible?
Best wishes,
Albert-Jan
--
https://mail.python.or
On 2024-03-08, Chris Angelico via Python-list wrote:
> On Sat, 9 Mar 2024 at 00:51, Grant Edwards via Python-list
> wrote:
>
>> One might argue that "global" isn't a good choice for what to call the
>> scope in question, since it's not global. It's limited to that source
>> file. It doesn't make s
On Sat, 9 Mar 2024 at 00:51, Grant Edwards via Python-list
wrote:
> One might argue that "global" isn't a good choice for what to call the
> scope in question, since it's not global. It's limited to that source
> file. It doesn't make sense to me to call a binding "global", when
> there can be mul
On 2024-03-07, Cameron Simpson via Python-list wrote:
> Yes. Note that the "global" namespace is the module in which the
> function is defined.
One might argue that "global" isn't a good choice for what to call the
scope in question, since it's not global. It's limited to that source
file. It d
13 matches
Mail list logo
