On Sat, 9 Mar 2024 at 00:51, Grant Edwards via Python-list <python-list@python.org> wrote: > One might argue that "global" isn't a good choice for what to call the > scope in question, since it's not global. It's limited to that source > file. It doesn't make sense to me to call a binding "global", when > there can be multile different "global" bindings of the same name. >
Most "globals" aren't global either, since you can have different globals in different running applications. ChrisA -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
