On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 3:23 PM Peter J. Holzer wrote:
>
> I don't know what "proper" TDD is (and even less "proper consideration"
> of TDD), but TDD is in my opinion very much rooted in the agile mindset.
> And that means frequent iteration and improvement. So I think the
> micro-iteration techni
As title, I tried to communicate with kernel via netlink. But I failed when
I receive msg from kernel.
The weird point is sending successfully from user to kernel, failed when
receiving from kernel.
So I want to check code in 3rd library and dig in, but always found library
called netlinkg but it
On 11/18/19 1:15 PM, R.Wieser wrote:
> The thing is that the arguments of py_proc1 and py_proc2 are the same, but
> for a single argument.
Does this have to be done in the C API? Depending on how this class is
used in your Python code, I would just create a new Python class that
extends this cla
> On Nov 18, 2019, at 4:07 PM, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
>
> On 2019-11-13 15:16:55 +1300, DL Neil via Python-list wrote:
>> On 4/11/19 9:44 AM, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
>>> TDD does in my opinion encourage EAFP thinking.
>>>
>>> The TDD is usually:
>>>
>>> 1 Write a test
>>> 2 Write the m
On Mon, 18 Nov 2019 22:15:31 +0100, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
> On 2019-11-18 15:01:57 -0600, Wildman via Python-list wrote:
>> On Tue, 19 Nov 2019 05:09:07 +1100, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> > On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 5:06 AM Wildman via Python-list
>> > wrote:
>> >> On Sun, 17 Nov 2019 18:27:45 +,
On 2019-11-15 12:11:31 +0100, R.Wieser wrote:
> Dennis,
> > No, that addition is a fixed increment on the initial starting
> > time, and is NOT relative to the ending of a sleep.
>
> > No, that addition is a fixed increment
>
> Yep.
>
> > on the initial starting time
>
> Nope.
>
> If pythons s
On 2019-11-13 15:16:55 +1300, DL Neil via Python-list wrote:
> On 4/11/19 9:44 AM, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
> > TDD does in my opinion encourage EAFP thinking.
> >
> > The TDD is usually:
> >
> > 1 Write a test
> > 2 Write the minimal amount of code that makes the test pass
> > 3 If
On 2019-11-18 15:01:57 -0600, Wildman via Python-list wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Nov 2019 05:09:07 +1100, Chris Angelico wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 5:06 AM Wildman via Python-list
> > wrote:
> >> On Sun, 17 Nov 2019 18:27:45 +, Barry Scott wrote:
> >> > Because you are installing from a deb y
On 2019-11-18 20:15, R.Wieser wrote:
MRAB,
One possibility is to refactor the code so that py_proc1 and py_proc2
themselves just handle their arguments and then call the function that
does the actual work.
The thing is that the arguments of py_proc1 and py_proc2 are the same, but
for a singl
On Tue, 19 Nov 2019 05:09:07 +1100, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 5:06 AM Wildman via Python-list
> wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, 17 Nov 2019 18:27:45 +, Barry Scott wrote:
>>
>> >> On 12 Nov 2019, at 20:24, Wildman via Python-list
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Yes, I prefer to envoke e
MRAB,
> One possibility is to refactor the code so that py_proc1 and py_proc2
> themselves just handle their arguments and then call the function that
> does the actual work.
The thing is that the arguments of py_proc1 and py_proc2 are the same, but
for a single argument. Which means that le
On 2019-11-18 07:52, R.Wieser wrote:
Hello all,
I'm trying to edit a binary extension to Python, and have a situation where
I would like to create method which adds a single argument, and than jumps
to / calls another method. Like this:
static PyObject *py_proc1(PyObject *self, PyObject *args)
On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 5:06 AM Wildman via Python-list
wrote:
>
> On Sun, 17 Nov 2019 18:27:45 +, Barry Scott wrote:
>
> >> On 12 Nov 2019, at 20:24, Wildman via Python-list
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> Yes, I prefer to envoke env in the shebang line instead of
> >> depending on the path. Paths c
On Sun, 17 Nov 2019 18:27:45 +, Barry Scott wrote:
>> On 12 Nov 2019, at 20:24, Wildman via Python-list
>> wrote:
>>
>> Yes, I prefer to envoke env in the shebang line instead of
>> depending on the path. Paths can change especially in a
>> multi-user system but env will always know where
Hongyi Zhao writes:
> On Sun, 17 Nov 2019 20:28:55 +0100, Pieter van Oostrum wrote:
>
>> To be honest, I myself would use Emacs, with rgrep and wgrep to do this.
>
> Are these tools superior to grep?
They are based on grep. But rgrep does a grep through a whole directory tree,
or a selection th
15 matches
Mail list logo
