On Mon, 18 Nov 2019 22:15:31 +0100, Peter J. Holzer wrote: > On 2019-11-18 15:01:57 -0600, Wildman via Python-list wrote: >> On Tue, 19 Nov 2019 05:09:07 +1100, Chris Angelico wrote: >> > On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 5:06 AM Wildman via Python-list >> > <python-list@python.org> wrote: >> >> On Sun, 17 Nov 2019 18:27:45 +0000, Barry Scott wrote: >> >> > Because you are installing from a deb you know the exact path to the >> >> > python you >> >> > need to use. There is no need to use the /usr/bin/env to search the >> >> > path and >> >> > potential break your code, because a version of python that you do not >> >> > expect is on >> >> > the path. >> >> >> >> I don't understand. The deb does not install python so I >> >> fail to see how I would know the exact path. >> >> >> >> As to env breaking my code, never heard of such a thing. >> >> >> > >> > The deb should depend on an appropriate Python package. Then you can >> > assume and expect that this version of Python is installed. >> >> Yes, of course, python(3) is listed as a "depends" in the deb >> control file. That does insure that python is installed but >> in no way does that tell me the path of the python executable. > > The debian packaging guidelines tell you where the execuable has to be. > If you install the python package you can be very sure that the > executable will be in /usr/bin. And this is the executable you want to > use. You don't want to use some other random program called "python" > (which may or may not be an interpreter for some version of the Python > language) which just happens to be in the user's path. > > hp
Yes, /usr/bin is the likely place to find the python executable but a guideline is not a guarantee. I have always been taught it is never a good idea to use a hard path unless it is something installed with your program or something created by your program. That approach has not failed me. -- <Wildman> GNU/Linux user #557453 The cow died so I don't need your bull! -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list