On Fri, 30 Mar 2018 20:51:22 -0600, Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 8:43 PM, Ian Kelly
> wrote:
>> You really think that 90% of the active users are trolls? And yet the
>> subreddit remains usable despite that allegedly terrible
>> signal-to-noise ratio.
>
> I'm now laughing at the im
On Sat, Mar 31, 2018 at 1:51 PM, Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 8:43 PM, Ian Kelly wrote:
>> You really think that 90% of the active users are trolls? And yet the
>> subreddit remains usable despite that allegedly terrible
>> signal-to-noise ratio.
>
> I'm now laughing at the image of
On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 8:43 PM, Ian Kelly wrote:
> You really think that 90% of the active users are trolls? And yet the
> subreddit remains usable despite that allegedly terrible
> signal-to-noise ratio.
I'm now laughing at the image of a large community of trolls sitting
around trolling each o
On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 7:10 PM, Rick Johnson
wrote:
> On Friday, March 30, 2018 at 7:44:40 PM UTC-5, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> [...]
>> Reddit's /ruby subreddit: 40,571 subscribers.
>>
>> Reddit's /python subreddit: 230,858 subscribers.
>
> Those numbers mean nothing unless you can prove all two-
On Sat, Mar 31, 2018 at 12:10 PM, Rick Johnson
wrote:
> On Friday, March 30, 2018 at 7:44:40 PM UTC-5, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> [...]
>> Reddit's /ruby subreddit: 40,571 subscribers.
>>
>> Reddit's /python subreddit: 230,858 subscribers.
>
> Those numbers mean nothing unless you can prove all two-
On Friday, March 30, 2018 at 7:44:40 PM UTC-5, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
[...]
> Reddit's /ruby subreddit: 40,571 subscribers.
>
> Reddit's /python subreddit: 230,858 subscribers.
Those numbers mean nothing unless you can prove all two-
hundred-thirty-odd thousand of them to be active, non-
tolling,
On Fri, 30 Mar 2018 16:18:57 -0700, Rick Johnson wrote:
> My suspicion is that not only are the overall numbers of Python
> programmers on the decline
Python's popularity went up from #5 to #4 between March 2017 and 2018 on
TIOBE: https://www.tiobe.com/tiobe-index/
But of course Rick knows this
On Sat, 31 Mar 2018 00:42:31 +0300, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
> Paul Rubin :
>> Terry Reedy writes:
>>> 2017 25% 2.x, 75% 3.x
>>> This is a bigger jump than I anticipated.
>>
>> It's interesting and surprising. I still have not encountered anyone
>> using Python 3 in real life. The main Linux distros
On Fri, 30 Mar 2018 11:45:10 -0400, Terry Reedy wrote:
> https://www.jetbrains.com/research/python-developers-survey-2017/ “Which
> version of Python do you use the most?”
> 2014 80% 2.x, 20% 3.x
> 2016 60% 2.x, 40% 3.x
> 2017 25% 2.x, 75% 3.x
>
> This is a bigger jump than I anticipated.
Thank
On Friday, March 30, 2018 at 10:45:35 AM UTC-5, Terry Reedy wrote:
> https://www.jetbrains.com/research/python-developers-survey-2017/
> “Which version of Python do you use the most?”
> 2014 80% 2.x, 20% 3.x
> 2016 60% 2.x, 40% 3.x
> 2017 25% 2.x, 75% 3.x
>
> This is a bigger jump than I anticipat
Paul Rubin :
> Terry Reedy writes:
>> 2017 25% 2.x, 75% 3.x
>> This is a bigger jump than I anticipated.
>
> It's interesting and surprising. I still have not encountered anyone
> using Python 3 in real life. The main Linux distros still use Python 2
> by default, afaik. I figured Python 3 adoptio
On 2018-03-30 21:13, C W wrote:
Hello all,
I want to create a dictionary.
The keys are 26 lowercase letters. The values are 26 uppercase letters.
The output should look like:
{'a': 'A', 'b': 'B',...,'z':'Z' }
I know I can use string.ascii_lowercase and string.ascii_uppercase, but how
do I use
Hello all,
I want to create a dictionary.
The keys are 26 lowercase letters. The values are 26 uppercase letters.
The output should look like:
{'a': 'A', 'b': 'B',...,'z':'Z' }
I know I can use string.ascii_lowercase and string.ascii_uppercase, but how
do I use it exactly?
I have tried the foll
On 30 March 2018 at 16:45, Terry Reedy wrote:
> https://www.jetbrains.com/research/python-developers-survey-2017/
> “Which version of Python do you use the most?”
> 2014 80% 2.x, 20% 3.x
> 2016 60% 2.x, 40% 3.x
> 2017 25% 2.x, 75% 3.x
>
> This is a bigger jump than I anticipated.
Nice!
--
https:
https://www.jetbrains.com/research/python-developers-survey-2017/
“Which version of Python do you use the most?”
2014 80% 2.x, 20% 3.x
2016 60% 2.x, 40% 3.x
2017 25% 2.x, 75% 3.x
This is a bigger jump than I anticipated.
--
Terry Jan Reedy
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-lis
On 3/30/2018 7:25 AM, Johannes Bauer wrote:
On 30.03.2018 13:13, Ben Bacarisse wrote:
import collections
class Test(object):
def __init__(self):
z = {
"y": collections.defaultdict(list),
This mention of collections refers to ...
On 30 March 2018 at 14:38, William Ray Wing wrote:
> Sumana, I want to be sure we aren’t just talking past each other. I notice
> that the URL you seem to always reference is:
>
> https://pypi.org/search/
>
> and if I go there, I get the filter list immediately. The place I don’t see
>
On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 9:30 PM, bartc wrote:
> On 26/03/2018 16:31, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> Yeah. It's so annoying that compilers work so hard to make your code
>> fast, when all you want to do is measure exactly how slow it is.
>> Compiler authors are stupid.
>
>
> In some ways, yes they are. I
Johannes Bauer writes:
> On 30.03.2018 13:13, Ben Bacarisse wrote:
>
>>> import collections
>>>
>>> class Test(object):
>>> def __init__(self):
>>> z = {
>>> "y": collections.defaultdict(list),
>>
>> This mention of collections refers to ...
>>
>>>
> On Mar 28, 2018, at 10:50 AM, sumana.hariharesw...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
[byte]
> : I ask you the usual list of troubleshooting questions. What OS and browser
> are you using, what plugins and particularly interesting preferences are you
> using, and so on. (When I turn off JavaScript in m
On 3/30/18 6:41 AM, bartc wrote:
On 27/03/2018 04:49, Richard Damon wrote:
On 3/26/18 8:46 AM, bartc wrote:
Hence my testing with CPython 3.6, rather than on something like
PyPy which can give results that are meaningless. Because, for
example, real code doesn't repeatedly execute the same p
On 30.03.2018 13:25, Johannes Bauer wrote:
>> This mention of collections refers to ...
>>
>>> }
>>> for (_, collections) in z.items():
>>
>> ... this local variable.
>
> Yup, but why? I mean, at the point of definition of "z", the only
> definition of "collections" that w
On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 9:24 PM, Johannes Bauer wrote:
> Hey group,
>
> I stumbled about something that I cannot quite explain while doing some
> stupid naming of variables in my code, in particular using "collections"
> as an identifier. However, what results is strange. I've created a
> minimal
On 30.03.2018 13:13, Ben Bacarisse wrote:
>> import collections
>>
>> class Test(object):
>> def __init__(self):
>> z = {
>> "y": collections.defaultdict(list),
>
> This mention of collections refers to ...
>
>> }
>> for (_, collec
Johannes Bauer writes:
> I stumbled about something that I cannot quite explain while doing some
> stupid naming of variables in my code, in particular using "collections"
> as an identifier. However, what results is strange. I've created a
> minimal example. Consider this:
>
> import collections
On 27/03/2018 04:49, Richard Damon wrote:
On 3/26/18 8:46 AM, bartc wrote:
Hence my testing with CPython 3.6, rather than on something like PyPy
which can give results that are meaningless. Because, for example,
real code doesn't repeatedly execute the same pointless fragment
millions of tim
On 26/03/2018 16:31, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 11:46 PM, bartc wrote:
On 26/03/2018 13:30, Richard Damon wrote:
On 3/26/18 6:31 AM, bartc wrote:
The purpose was to establish how such int("...") conversions compare in
overheads with actual arithmetic with the resulting
Hey group,
I stumbled about something that I cannot quite explain while doing some
stupid naming of variables in my code, in particular using "collections"
as an identifier. However, what results is strange. I've created a
minimal example. Consider this:
import collections
class Test(object):
Thanks a lot Antoon.
On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 2:51 PM, Antoon Pardon wrote:
> On 30-03-18 08:16, Iranna Mathapati wrote:
> > Hi Team,
> >
> >
> > how to achieve fallowing expected output?
> >
> > str_output= """
> >
> > MOD1 memory : 2 valid1790 free
> > MOD2 me
On 30-03-18 08:16, Iranna Mathapati wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
>
> how to achieve fallowing expected output?
>
> str_output= """
>
> MOD1 memory : 2 valid1790 free
> MOD2 memory : 128 valid 128 free
> UDP Aware *MEMR*
On 30Mar2018 11:46, Iranna Mathapati wrote:
how to achieve fallowing expected output?
str_output= """
MOD1 memory : 2 valid1790 free
MOD2 memory : 128 valid 128 free
UDP Aware *MEMR*: 0 valid 0 free *
Hi Cameron.
str_output= """
MOD1 memory: 2 valid1790 free
MOD2 memory: 128 valid 128 free
UDP Aware MEMR : 0 valid0 free
*MEMR* : 21 valid 491 free
Feature XYZ
32 matches
Mail list logo
