Ben Finney writes:
> Steven D'Aprano writes:
>
> > (1) […] If there is a NAN in your data, the result of calling
> > median() is implementation-defined.
>
> This is the least Pythonic; there is no good reason IMO for specifying a
> behaviour in the implementation.
That's a confused statement. I
Steven D'Aprano writes:
> I would like to ask people how they would prefer to handle [the
> computation of median when the data set contains NaN]:
>
> (1) Put the responsibility on the caller to strip NANs from their
> data. If there is a NAN in your data, the result of calling median()
> is impl
Hello,
im not entirely happy with my solution and would love to hear your
suggestions on how to improve the solution.
I simplified the task while keeping the code working.
Task:
financial accounts are described by XML documents. I want to architecture
the code to be easily extendible ( easy to
On Fri, 16 Mar 2018 22:08:42 -0400, Terry Reedy wrote:
> On 3/16/2018 7:16 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>> The bug tracker currently has a discussion of a bug in the median(),
>> median_low() and median_high() functions that they wrongly compute the
>> medians in the face of NANs in the data:
[...]
On 3/16/2018 7:16 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
The bug tracker currently has a discussion of a bug in the median(),
median_low() and median_high() functions that they wrongly compute the
medians in the face of NANs in the data:
https://bugs.python.org/issue33084
I would like to ask people how the
The bug tracker currently has a discussion of a bug in the median(),
median_low() and median_high() functions that they wrongly compute the
medians in the face of NANs in the data:
https://bugs.python.org/issue33084
I would like to ask people how they would prefer to handle this issue:
(1) Put
Thank you, thank you, thank you.
That fixed it (at least on my computer, I'll see if I can do that at my school).
Irv
> On Mar 15, 2018, at 7:39 PM, Ned Deily wrote:
>
> On 2018-03-14 18:04, Irv Kalb wrote:
>> File
>> "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.6/lib/python3.6/urllib/re
Le 16/03/2018 à 16:55, Ian Kelly a écrit :
Note that this function can't be called more than once, because it
closes the event loop at the end. Next time you call it it will get
the closed event loop and try to schedule on it and then raise an
exception because it's closed.
Ah ok.
So, if I repl
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 1:35 PM, Julien Salort wrote:
> Because I wanted to keep the synchronous function for scripts which used it,
> without unnecessarily duplicating the code, I built also a synchronous
> function from this new asynchronous one, like that:
>
> def acquire_to_files(self, *args
Hello,
I have recently got the need to convert a synchronous function to
asynchronous function because I needed to run three of them
concurrently. Since I am using Python 3.6, I used async def and asyncio
and that has worked out great. Thank you guys for making this possible.
Because I want
10 matches
Mail list logo
