Ben Finney <ben+pyt...@benfinney.id.au> writes: > Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info> writes: > > > (1) […] If there is a NAN in your data, the result of calling > > median() is implementation-defined. > > This is the least Pythonic; there is no good reason IMO for specifying a > behaviour in the implementation.
That's a confused statement. I mean to say: there's no good reason IMO to leave the behaviour undefined in the function specification. -- \ “I don't accept the currently fashionable assertion that any | `\ view is automatically as worthy of respect as any equal and | _o__) opposite view.” —Douglas Adams | Ben Finney -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
