santosh.yelamar...@gmail.com writes:
> I need help in python smpplib, I am trying to send message through smpplib
> but I can't.
>
> Actually, In web I seen one video regarding this
>
> link :
> http://fosshelp.blogspot.in/2014/01/python-howto-send-sms-using-smpp.html
>
> In this video, he is abl
Am 19.05.17 um 02:27 schrieb bartc:
So I need msbuild. (This is getting more and more like the Tutti Frutti
sketch in that Marx Bros film...)
Install MSBUILD. Start a new console. Type msbuild; nothing. In fact I
can't find any trace of it. Eventually track it down to inside VS
directories, b
On Fri, 19 May 2017 10:40 am, Michael Torrie wrote:
>> Since you are ultimately compiling the code in C, those ideas of
>> undefined behaviour etc do apply. The behaviour of the C compiler doesn't
>> suddenly, magically, change just because the code was generated by a
>> program in another languag
On Fri, 19 May 2017 07:46 am, bartc wrote:
> And why am I being put through the third degree?
When you are a lone wolf cowboy coder, and you choose to publicly criticise
code written by dozens of people and claim that your code is so much better
than theirs, then you should expect to be asked to
On Fri, 19 May 2017 04:17 am, bartc wrote:
> The wall of text consists of very long string constants that gcc is
> displaying so it can tell you they are very long. (One or two compilers
> can't handle them, but gcc can, so a routine that would normally divide
> them into smaller ones has been dis
> -Original Message-
> From: Python-list
> [mailto:python-list-bounces+python=deborahswanson.net@python.o
> rg] On Behalf Of Gregory Ewing
> Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2017 5:00 PM
> To: python-list@python.org
> Subject: Re: Survey: improving the Python std lib docs
>
>
> Deborah Swanson
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 10:40 AM, Michael Torrie wrote:
>> Since you are ultimately compiling the code in C, those ideas of undefined
>> behaviour etc do apply. The behaviour of the C compiler doesn't suddenly,
>> magically, change just because the code was generated by a program in
>> another lan
On 05/18/2017 05:15 PM, Steve D'Aprano wrote:
> Oh but this is Bart we're talking about. Of course his code generator is
> perfect, it is unthinkable that it emits incorrect code.
I think we've picked on Bart enough for one day. Fortunately he seems
rather good natured, but this is bordering on t
On 18/05/2017 18:11, Steve D'Aprano wrote:
On Thu, 18 May 2017 11:38 pm, bartc wrote:
Seems a bit hypocritical, don't you think? Expecting people to go spelunking
into your undocumented mystery language source code to work out how to
build it from source, and then turning around and complainin
Deborah Swanson wrote:
somenamedtuple._replace(kwargs)
Return a new instance of the named tuple replacing specified fields
with new values:
(Examples
box)---|
|>>>
|
|
|
|>>> p = Point(x=11, y=22)
|
|>>> p._replace(x=33
justin walters wrote, on Thursday, May 18, 2017 8:09 AM
> To: python-list@python.org
> Subject: Re: Survey: improving the Python std lib docs
>
> So, args can be treated as a simple (named)? tuple or a
> simple dictionary. `*` unpacks a list or tuple and `**`
> unpacks a dictionary. I'm sure it'
On Thursday, May 18, 2017 at 2:44:54 PM UTC-7, qasi...@gmail.com wrote:
> Yes, I wrote: "The atoms of the first part/half according to the main COM of
> the ligand are C2, C7, C8 and C9. As for the second part they are C3, C4, C5
> and C6 atoms." It was just an example. In fact, I don't know whic
On Fri, 19 May 2017 06:12 am, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 5:29 AM, bartc wrote:
>> On 18/05/2017 19:50, Chris Angelico wrote:
>>
>>> Now this, however, is more serious. Those warnings scare me, too. (I
>>> just tried it.) Instead of being "gcc is noisy", these are "your code
>
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 7:46 AM, bartc wrote:
> On 18/05/2017 21:12, Chris Angelico wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 5:29 AM, bartc wrote:
>
>
>> "largely" verified. Can you be absolutely certain that not one of
>> these compiler-detected issues is actually a problem? Would you stake
>> your
On 18/05/2017 21:12, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 5:29 AM, bartc wrote:
"largely" verified. Can you be absolutely certain that not one of
these compiler-detected issues is actually a problem? Would you stake
your life on it - for example, would you compile this code and put i
Yes, I wrote: "The atoms of the first part/half according to the main COM of
the ligand are C2, C7, C8 and C9. As for the second part they are C3, C4, C5
and C6 atoms." It was just an example. In fact, I don't know which atoms belong
to each half. The code should do it of course.
That is, I gav
On Thursday, May 18, 2017 at 1:43:20 PM UTC-7, qasi...@gmail.com wrote:
> Dear Gregory Ewing,
>
> As I said before, I need to divide the molecule into two parts but don't know
> how to do it? It seems that I need to choose/determine a plane in 3D space
> which cuts the molecule in two parts. As
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 12:48 PM, Skip Montanaro
wrote:
> > It's the technology board on 4chan. It's pretty useless. Mostly just for
> > messing around.
>
> Thanks. I tried to visit 4chan, but company access policy forbade
> it... Something about porn.
>
> Skip
>
The place is a cesspool. I don't
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 1:29 PM, bartc wrote:
>
> On 18/05/2017 19:50, Chris Angelico wrote:
>
>> Now this, however, is more serious. Those warnings scare me, too. (I
>> just tried it.) Instead of being "gcc is noisy", these are "your code
>> is sloppy". These are exactly why I tell most people NO
Dear Gregory Ewing,
As I said before, I need to divide the molecule into two parts but don't know
how to do it? It seems that I need to choose/determine a plane in 3D space
which cuts the molecule in two parts. As John Ladasky suggested, I need to
describe the criteria that cut needs to satisfy
On 18-5-2017 3:30, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
> Late-comer... I'm pretty sure 1.4, if not 1.3 was the version
> documented in the first books I bought on the language...
>
> And I bought because AmigaOS was listed as a viable candidate (thanks
> Irmen) -- within a week I had written an o
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 5:29 AM, bartc wrote:
> On 18/05/2017 19:50, Chris Angelico wrote:
>
>> Now this, however, is more serious. Those warnings scare me, too. (I
>> just tried it.) Instead of being "gcc is noisy", these are "your code
>> is sloppy". These are exactly why I tell most people NOT
bartc :
> Bear in mind C allows you to do this:
>
> int *A[10];// array of pointers to int
> int (*B)[10]; // pointer to array of int
> int i;
>
> *A[i]; // index then deref to get the int
> (*B)[i]; // deref then index to get the int
>
> That's fine so far: one is an array of p
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 4:17 AM, bartc wrote:
> I'm sorry, I thought anyone who has used C a couple of times would know how
> to compile a Hello, World program. And would know how to download a file
> into a local directory. Here are some instructions to get started:
>
> (1) Click on this link:
>
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 11:18 AM, Skip Montanaro
wrote:
> > I visit /g/ quite often ...
>
> Is this a channel on Reddit or something else?
>
> Thx,
>
> Skip Montanaro
>
It's the technology board on 4chan. It's pretty useless. Mostly just for
messing around.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/li
On 18/05/2017 18:11, Steve D'Aprano wrote:
Seems a bit hypocritical, don't you think? Expecting people to go spelunking
into your undocumented mystery language source code to work out how to
build it from source, and then turning around and complaining that Python's
build process:
PCbuild\build
On 18/05/2017 19:50, Chris Angelico wrote:
Now this, however, is more serious. Those warnings scare me, too. (I
just tried it.) Instead of being "gcc is noisy", these are "your code
is sloppy". These are exactly why I tell most people NOT to write in
C. For machine-generated code, this is IMO un
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 3:11 AM, Steve D'Aprano
wrote:
> On Thu, 18 May 2017 11:38 pm, bartc wrote:
>> OK, same url but with '32' instead:
>>
>> https://github.com/bartg/langs/blob/master/qlang/qcc32.c
>> https://github.com/bartg/langs/blob/master/qlang/pcc32.c
>
> https://duckduck
Can anybody help or share a python code using Tkinter for opening cmd.exe and
running command given from input box.
For eg. when I run the code it will ask IP in an input box gui and ping
response for that IP will be on cmd console
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 18/05/2017 19:17, bartc wrote:
On 18/05/2017 18:11, Steve D'Aprano wrote:
unsafe dereferencing of type-punned pointers, missing parentheses,
suggested parentheses not missing.
And they are suggested because, in C, when people write a
On 18/05/2017 18:11, Steve D'Aprano wrote:
On Thu, 18 May 2017 11:38 pm, bartc wrote:
Speaking of user-hostile experiences, why do you need separate source
files for 32- and 64-bit builds? Why isn't it just a build option?
I've never heard of people using separate source code for 32- and 64-bi
On Thursday, May 18, 2017 at 3:55:01 AM UTC-7, qasi...@gmail.com wrote:
> @jladasky and @Gregory:
>
> 3) Divide the ligand molecule into two parts (except for ligand heavy atom
> closest to the COM of the whole ligand) based on the COM previously
> calculated.
OK, now I agree with Gregory Ewin
On Thu, 18 May 2017 11:38 pm, bartc wrote:
> > Speaking of user-hostile experiences, why do you need separate source
> > files for 32- and 64-bit builds? Why isn't it just a build option?
> >
> > I've never heard of people using separate source code for 32- and 64-bit
> > releases. I can understan
On 18/05/2017 15:32, Ian Kelly wrote:
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 8:02 AM, bartc wrote:
On 18/05/2017 12:37, Rhodri James wrote:
but (a) you have no leg to stand on
criticising configure scripts with that file,
You think so?
After the first 50 lines, there are no #includes, no #defines, no #i
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 8:08 AM, justin walters
wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 12:09 AM, Deborah Swanson <
> pyt...@deborahswanson.net> wrote:
>
>> Michael Torrie wrote, on Wednesday, May 17, 2017 3:11 PM
>> >
>> > On 05/17/2017 02:31 PM, Ned Batchelder wrote:
>> > > Can you give an example
On 2017-05-17, BT wrote:
> I am fairly new to programming. I was just trying to understand how
> this group works. Am i allowed to ask any questions that I may have
> when i get stuck?
Certainly.
For best results, post small pieces of code that demonstrate your
problem/question (cut and paste f
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 12:09 AM, Deborah Swanson wrote:
> Michael Torrie wrote, on Wednesday, May 17, 2017 3:11 PM
> >
> > On 05/17/2017 02:31 PM, Ned Batchelder wrote:
> > > Can you give an example of such a method? Often, that signature is
> > > used because there is no pre-conception of what
On 2017-05-18, Steve D'Aprano wrote:
> On Thu, 18 May 2017 01:37 am, bartc wrote:
>
>> No, not like that. I mean genuinely simple. Your example:
>>
>> (1) Doesn't work on Windows
>> (2) Usually seems to involve executing 20,000 to to 30,000 lines of
>> complete gobbledygook in that configuration
On 2017-05-17, bartc wrote:
> The content of configure is high-level human readable source code.
No it isn't. Human-readable, that is. And it isn't intended to be.
> But it is meaningless.
IOW, it's not human-readable.
Expecting to understand the code in configure.sh is like expecting to
un
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 12:34 AM, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
> On Wed, 17 May 2017 14:13:18 -0700, breamoreboy wrote:
>
> > Here it is
> > https://aroberge.blogspot.co.uk/2017/05/what-if-range-did-not-
> exist.html.
> > I found it interesting as it gives background into the Python
> > community's de
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 8:02 AM, bartc wrote:
>
> On 18/05/2017 12:37, Rhodri James wrote:
>>
>> but (a) you have no leg to stand on
>> criticising configure scripts with that file,
>
> You think so?
>
> After the first 50 lines, there are no #includes, no #defines, no #ifs or
#ifdefs, in fact I t
On 18/05/2017 12:37, Rhodri James wrote:
On 18/05/17 02:12, bartc wrote:
So tell us Bart, what do you think are the chances that your Q
compiler will
*just work* with no modifications at all if somebody tried to build
it on
an IBM AS/400, or under BeOS?
Maybe somebody can try it:
https://
On 18/05/2017 07:13, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Thu, 18 May 2017 02:12:58 +0100, bartc wrote:
A portable C application should run anywhere there is a C compiler.
Ha, somebody believed the advertising hype that C is a portable, write-
once-run-anywhere language.
Maybe somebody can try it:
On Thu, 18 May 2017 06:10 pm, Christian Gollwitzer wrote:
> Am 18.05.17 um 00:21 schrieb Chris Angelico:
>> On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 8:06 AM, Christian Gollwitzer
>> wrote:
>>> tcc even has a "JIT-mode" of operation (libtcc). For Tcl, there exists
>>> an extension which compiles C code to memory a
On Thu, 18 May 2017 05:55 pm, santosh.yelamar...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hello Everyone,
>
> I need help in python smpplib, I am trying to send message through smpplib
> but I can't.
What have you tried? Are we supposed to guess what code you have written?
Without seeing your code, the only thing I
On Thu, 18 May 2017 07:55 pm, breamore...@gmail.com wrote:
>> When I first started using Python in version 1.5, among the many Unixes
>> supported were:
>>
>> - VAX;
>> - VMS;
>
> VAX and VMS are Unixes, you learn something new every day ;)
*As well as* the many Unixes supported.
:-P
--
On 18/05/17 02:12, bartc wrote:
So tell us Bart, what do you think are the chances that your Q
compiler will
*just work* with no modifications at all if somebody tried to build it on
an IBM AS/400, or under BeOS?
Maybe somebody can try it:
https://github.com/bartg/langs/blob/master/qlang/q
@jladasky and @Gregory:
Thanks your replies.
The code should do the steps below:
1) Calculate the center of mass (COM) of the whole ligand molecule with the
atomic coordinates (x,y,z)
2) Find the ligand heavy atom closest to the COM of the whole ligand molecule
3) Divide the ligand molecule int
For those of you who share my extremely dry sense of humour you might like to
take a look at this
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.lang.python/-58lTkBBZU4. I've not
shared directly as it's the latest from the RUE. Apparantly Python 3 is the
buggiest ever, despite the huge build in
On Thursday, May 18, 2017 at 1:19:48 AM UTC+1, Steve D'Aprano wrote:
> On Thu, 18 May 2017 07:47 am, Ian Kelly wrote:
>
> > Because, as has already been stated, there's no way to make such a simple
> > process cross-platform.
>
> Please understand that Bart's understanding of cross-platform and t
On Wednesday, May 17, 2017 at 9:27:58 PM UTC+1, bartc wrote:
> On 17/05/2017 21:05, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> > On Wednesday, May 17, 2017 at 8:32:40 PM UTC+1, bartc wrote:
> >> On 17/05/2017 17:23, Chris Angelico wrote:
> >>> On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 1:37 AM, bartc wrote:
> On 17/05/2017 15:13,
On Wednesday, May 17, 2017 at 9:00:08 PM UTC+1, BT wrote:
> Hi guys,
> I am fairly new to programming. I was just trying to understand how this
> group works. Am i allowed to ask any questions that I may have when i get
> stuck? I mean is this group for new programmers as well..?
> Thanks
You ca
Here it is
https://aroberge.blogspot.co.uk/2017/05/what-if-range-did-not-exist.html. I
found it interesting as it gives background into the Python community's
development philosophy. I read it from start to finish but some of you may
simply wish to jump to the punch line.
Kindest regards.
M
On Wednesday, May 17, 2017 at 8:32:40 PM UTC+1, bartc wrote:
> On 17/05/2017 17:23, Chris Angelico wrote:
> > On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 1:37 AM, bartc wrote:
> >> On 17/05/2017 15:13, Chris Angelico wrote:
>
> > [1] Does work on Windows. Install bash for Windows, or (on a
> > recent-enough Windows)
Am 18.05.17 um 00:21 schrieb Chris Angelico:
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 8:06 AM, Christian Gollwitzer wrote:
tcc even has a "JIT-mode" of operation (libtcc). For Tcl, there exists an
extension which compiles C code to memory and executes directly from there.
The same thing could be done for Python
Hello Everyone,
I need help in python smpplib, I am trying to send message through smpplib but
I can't.
Actually, In web I seen one video regarding this
link : http://fosshelp.blogspot.in/2014/01/python-howto-send-sms-using-smpp.html
In this video, he is able to send sms through the same code.
On Wed, 17 May 2017 14:13:18 -0700, breamoreboy wrote:
> Here it is
> https://aroberge.blogspot.co.uk/2017/05/what-if-range-did-not-
exist.html.
> I found it interesting as it gives background into the Python
> community's development philosophy. I read it from start to finish but
> some of you
jlada...@itu.edu wrote:
I took the OP at their word. S/he wants the center of mass of the whole
molecule, with the atomic coordinates as shown. Then s/he wants the center
of mass of two subsets of those atoms. Unless I misunderstood, this isn't a
particularly difficult task.
He said he wante
Michael Torrie wrote, on Wednesday, May 17, 2017 3:11 PM
>
> On 05/17/2017 02:31 PM, Ned Batchelder wrote:
> > Can you give an example of such a method? Often, that signature is
> > used because there is no pre-conception of what the arguments might
> > be.
>
> I'm not sure if this afflicts the
59 matches
Mail list logo
