On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 12:10 AM, Wildman via Python-list
wrote:
> I have a program that I have been trying to rewrite so it will
> run on Python 2.7 and 3.4. It has been a pain to say the least.
> Thank $DIETY for aliases. Anyway, I got it all working except
> for one thing. The program has an
On 3/25/2016 1:10 AM, Wildman via Python-list wrote:
I have a program that I have been trying to rewrite so it will
run on Python 2.7 and 3.4. It has been a pain to say the least.
Thank $DIETY for aliases. Anyway, I got it all working except
for one thing. The program has an embedded icon. It
I have a program that I have been trying to rewrite so it will
run on Python 2.7 and 3.4. It has been a pain to say the least.
Thank $DIETY for aliases. Anyway, I got it all working except
for one thing. The program has an embedded icon. It is displayed
in the window's titlebar. The icon is a
On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 21:43:26 -0400, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 11:19:52 -0500, Wildman via Python-list
> declaimed the following:
>
>>
>>I believe I understand. Thanks. If you can't tell, I'm new to
>>Python so the learning process is on-going.
>
> And you decided to
On Friday, March 25, 2016 at 6:08:43 AM UTC+5:30, Ned Batchelder wrote:
> Yes Mark, you are a problem. You insult people personally. There is no need
> for that. BartC is a challenge, I agree, but he has not said anything
> personal against you or anyone else.
>
> Stop making personal attacks.
On 03/24/2016 04:18 PM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> On 24/03/2016 19:54, BartC wrote:
>> On 24/03/2016 18:10, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>>> On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 12:01 am, BartC wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Then those numbers are pointless.
>>
>> Yes, they would need some adjustment to do this stuff properly.
>
> Plea
On 3/24/2016 4:43 PM, kevind0...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday, March 24, 2016 at 4:29:03 PM UTC-4, Random832 wrote:
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016, at 16:24, kevind0...@gmail.com wrote:
If I run the code below two windows appear.
One empty and one with the text box and button.
>>> Why?
The answer to
On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 13:24:16 -0700, kevind0718 wrote:
> Hello:
>
> newbie Tkinter question
>
> If I run the code below two windows appear.
> One empty and one with the text box and button.
>
> Why? please
>
> KD
>
>
>
> from Tkinter import *
>
> class MyDialog:
> def __init__(self, pa
I am new to python and I want to use web scraping to download songs from
website.
how do I write code to check if the website has uploaded a new song and have
that song automatically be downloaded onto my computer. I know how to use the
requests.get() module but i am more interested in knowing h
On Thursday, March 24, 2016 at 7:47:34 PM UTC-4, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> On 24/03/2016 23:33, Ian Kelly wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 4:58 PM, Mark Lawrence
> > wrote:
> >> No. While this idiot, BartC, is let loose on this forum, I'll say what I
> >> like.
> >
> > Good to know. I've been on
On Thursday, March 24, 2016 at 2:03:58 PM UTC-4, BartC wrote:
> On 24/03/2016 17:13, Ned Batchelder wrote:
> > On Thursday, March 24, 2016 at 12:12:55 PM UTC-4, BartC wrote:
> >> On 24/03/2016 15:30, Ned Batchelder wrote:
> >>> On Thursday, March 24, 2016 at 9:51:11 AM UTC-4, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 4:53 PM, wrote:
> I use Python wherever I can and find this list (as a usenet group via
> gmane) an invaluable help at times.
>
> Occasionally I have to make forays into Javascript, can anyone
> recommend a place similar to this list where Javascript questions can
> be ask
On 24/03/2016 23:33, Ian Kelly wrote:
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 4:58 PM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
No. While this idiot, BartC, is let loose on this forum, I'll say what I
like.
Good to know. I've been on the fence about this for a long time, but
lately the frequency of your outbursts seems to have
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 4:58 PM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> No. While this idiot, BartC, is let loose on this forum, I'll say what I
> like.
Good to know. I've been on the fence about this for a long time, but
lately the frequency of your outbursts seems to have increased, and
you're being more of a
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 7:06 PM, Mark Lawrence
wrote:
> On 24/03/2016 22:45, c...@isbd.net wrote:
>
>> Mark Lawrence wrote:
>>
>>> On 24/03/2016 22:08, c...@isbd.net wrote:
>>>
If you do find anything like c.l.p for Javascript, let us know...
>
> OK! :-)
>>> I'd try
On 24/03/2016 22:45, c...@isbd.net wrote:
Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 24/03/2016 22:08, c...@isbd.net wrote:
If you do find anything like c.l.p for Javascript, let us know...
OK! :-)
I'd try c.l.bartc as he is the world's leading expert on everything that
you need to know about any languag
On 24/03/2016 22:49, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 9:31 AM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 24/03/2016 22:08, c...@isbd.net wrote:
If you do find anything like c.l.p for Javascript, let us know...
OK! :-)
I'd try c.l.bartc as he is the world's leading expert on everything that
Mark Lawrence wrote:
> On 24/03/2016 22:08, c...@isbd.net wrote:
> >
> >> If you do find anything like c.l.p for Javascript, let us know...
> >>
> > OK! :-)
> >
>
> I'd try c.l.bartc as he is the world's leading expert on everything that
> you need to know about any language, whereby the only t
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 9:31 AM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> On 24/03/2016 22:08, c...@isbd.net wrote:
>>
>>
>>> If you do find anything like c.l.p for Javascript, let us know...
>>>
>> OK! :-)
>>
>
> I'd try c.l.bartc as he is the world's leading expert on everything that you
> need to know about any
On 12/03/2016 01:16, BartC wrote:
Please go and play with this.
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/community/blogs/jfp/entry/A_Comparison_Of_C_Julia_Python_Numba_Cython_Scipy_and_BLAS_on_LU_Factorization?lang=en
--
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask
what you ca
On 24/03/2016 14:37, Rustom Mody wrote:
On Thursday, March 24, 2016 at 7:46:55 PM UTC+5:30, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
BartC :
And forgetting Python for a minute and concentrating only on its
byte-code as a language in its own right, how would you go about the
job of streamlining it?
Really, you
On 24/03/2016 22:08, c...@isbd.net wrote:
If you do find anything like c.l.p for Javascript, let us know...
OK! :-)
I'd try c.l.bartc as he is the world's leading expert on everything that
you need to know about any language, whereby the only thing to know is
how fast is it. It's just
Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2016-03-24, c...@isbd.net wrote:
>
> > I use Python wherever I can and find this list (as a usenet group
> > via gmane) an invaluable help at times.
> >
> > Occasionally I have to make forays into Javascript, can anyone
> > recommend a place similar to this list where J
On 24/03/2016 19:54, BartC wrote:
On 24/03/2016 18:10, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 12:01 am, BartC wrote:
Then those numbers are pointless.
Yes, they would need some adjustment to do this stuff properly.
Please give up before you get sued by the families of the people who
On 2016-03-24, c...@isbd.net wrote:
> I use Python wherever I can and find this list (as a usenet group
> via gmane) an invaluable help at times.
>
> Occasionally I have to make forays into Javascript, can anyone
> recommend a place similar to this list where Javascript questions
> can be asked?
I use Python wherever I can and find this list (as a usenet group via
gmane) an invaluable help at times.
Occasionally I have to make forays into Javascript, can anyone
recommend a place similar to this list where Javascript questions can
be asked? The trouble is that there are very many usenet J
On Thursday, March 24, 2016 at 4:29:03 PM UTC-4, Random832 wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2016, at 16:24, kevind0...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Hello:
> >
> > newbie Tkinter question
> >
> > If I run the code below two windows appear.
> > One empty and one with the text box and button.
>
> The empty one is
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016, at 16:24, kevind0...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hello:
>
> newbie Tkinter question
>
> If I run the code below two windows appear.
> One empty and one with the text box and button.
The empty one is the root window.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Hello:
newbie Tkinter question
If I run the code below two windows appear.
One empty and one with the text box and button.
Why? please
KD
from Tkinter import *
class MyDialog:
def __init__(self, parent):
top = self.top = Toplevel(parent)
Label(top, text="Value").pack(
On 24/03/2016 18:10, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 12:01 am, BartC wrote:
Python 3 (on Windows) might take 200ns. Clisp is 1300ns (interpreted,
presumably). Ruby 170ns. Lua 80ns. Mine 10-20ns. Unoptimised C is 4ns,
but this is not executing code indirectly as most of the rest have
On 03/21/2016 06:43 AM, BartC wrote:
> On 21/03/2016 12:08, Ned Batchelder wrote:
>> On Sunday, March 20, 2016 at 9:15:32 PM UTC-4, BartC wrote:
>>>
>>> A tokeniser along those lines in Python, with most of the bits filled
>>> in, is here:
>>>
>>> http://pastebin.com/dtM8WnFZ
>>>
>>
>> Bart, we get
On 2016-03-24, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 02:03 am, Jon Ribbens wrote:
>> On 2016-03-24, BartC wrote:
>>> On 24/03/2016 14:08, Jon Ribbens wrote:
if you thought you needed to do that then most likely what you
should actually be doing is re-writing your code so you no l
On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 14:28:32 +, BartC wrote:
> On 24/03/2016 14:01, Chris Angelico wrote:
>
>> I don't, until it's pointed out. At that point, someone who respects
>> the language will at least pay *some* heed to the changed
>> recommendations; what we're seeing here is that he continues to u
On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 14:04:53 +, BartC wrote:
> On 24/03/2016 13:50, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>> On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 02:24 pm, Chris Angelico wrote:
>>
>>
>>> This is how you're currently evaluating Python. Instead of starting
>>> with the most simple and obvious code
>>
>> One problem is that wh
On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 12:01 am, BartC wrote:
> But there are all sorts of micro-micro-benchmarks that can concentrate
> on a single byte-code. For example, how long does it take to call an
> empty function with no parameters? Just putting such a call into a
> simple loop can be effective:
>
> Python
On 24/03/2016 17:13, Ned Batchelder wrote:
On Thursday, March 24, 2016 at 12:12:55 PM UTC-4, BartC wrote:
On 24/03/2016 15:30, Ned Batchelder wrote:
On Thursday, March 24, 2016 at 9:51:11 AM UTC-4, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
You know what is missing from this conversation?
For one of Bart's criti
On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 02:03 am, Jon Ribbens wrote:
> On 2016-03-24, BartC wrote:
>> On 24/03/2016 14:08, Jon Ribbens wrote:
>>> if you thought you needed to do that then most likely what you
>>> should actually be doing is re-writing your code so you no longer
>>> need to. However, you could do:
>>
On 24.03.2016 14:22, Matt Wheeler wrote:
On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 11:10 Sven R. Kunze, wrote:
On 24.03.2016 11:57, Matt Wheeler wrote:
import ast
s = "(1, 2, 3, 4)"
t = ast.literal_eval(s)
t
(1, 2, 3, 4)
I suppose that's the better solution in terms of safety.
It has the added advantage that t
On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 01:16 am, BartC wrote:
> Or is the Pythonic way, when you want to change some elements of a list
> to just build a new one that incorporates those changes?
If you are only changing a few elements, or one at a time in some random
order, then just change the element. Lists have
On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 01:04 am, BartC wrote:
> On 24/03/2016 13:50, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>> On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 02:24 pm, Chris Angelico wrote:
>>
>>
>>> This is how you're currently evaluating Python. Instead of starting
>>> with the most simple and obvious code
>>
>> One problem is that what cou
On Thursday, March 24, 2016 at 12:12:55 PM UTC-4, BartC wrote:
> On 24/03/2016 15:30, Ned Batchelder wrote:
> > On Thursday, March 24, 2016 at 9:51:11 AM UTC-4, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> >> You know what is missing from this conversation?
> >>
> >> For one of Bart's critics to actually show faster c
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 11:21 AM, Niyoo *Unkown*
wrote:
> The reason I uninstalled Python was because it was 32 bit not 64 bit and I
> couldn't find the 64 bit version.
Have a look at this page: https://www.python.org/downloads/windows/
The 64 bit versions are the "x86_64" ones.
--
Zach
--
ht
On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 12:21:29 -0400, Niyoo *Unkown* wrote:
> The reason I uninstalled Python was because it was 32 bit not 64 bit and
> I couldn't find the 64 bit version.
that's nice
--
That which is not good for the swarm, neither is it good for the bee.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/l
The reason I uninstalled Python was because it was 32 bit not 64 bit and I
couldn't find the 64 bit version.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 08:06:28 -0400, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Mar 2016 21:17:57 -0500, Wildman via Python-list
> declaimed the following:
>
>>
>>I was referring to procedures called by a button click as
>>opposed to a procedure calledd from elsewhere in the code.
>>I guess there is n
On 24/03/2016 15:30, Ned Batchelder wrote:
On Thursday, March 24, 2016 at 9:51:11 AM UTC-4, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
You know what is missing from this conversation?
For one of Bart's critics to actually show faster code.
There's plenty of people telling him off for writing unpythonic and slow
c
On 3/23/2016 8:39 PM, Bryon Fawcett wrote:
Could you please advise me how to connect the python software to my default
printer.
IDLE prints to default printer with function print_window in
idlelib/IOBinding.py. The two GetOption calls return these two strings
(from config-main.def).
For p
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016, at 11:18, BartC wrote:
> On 24/03/2016 15:03, Jon Ribbens wrote:
> > No it isn't, it's replacing the elements in-place,
>
> Replace them with what, if not an entirely new list built from
> '[0]*len(L)'?
Well, the *contents* of such a list, obviously. But the original list's
On Thursday, March 24, 2016 at 9:51:11 AM UTC-4, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> You know what is missing from this conversation?
>
> For one of Bart's critics to actually show faster code.
>
> There's plenty of people telling him off for writing unpythonic and slow
> code, but I haven't seen anyone act
On 2016-03-24, BartC wrote:
> On 24/03/2016 14:08, Jon Ribbens wrote:
>> if you thought you needed to do that then most likely what you
>> should actually be doing is re-writing your code so you no longer
>> need to. However, you could do:
>>
>>L[:] = [0] * len(L)
>
> OK, but that's just build
On 2016-03-24, BartC wrote:
> On 24/03/2016 15:03, Jon Ribbens wrote:
>> On 2016-03-24, BartC wrote:
>>> On 24/03/2016 14:08, Jon Ribbens wrote:
if you thought you needed to do that then most likely what you
should actually be doing is re-writing your code so you no longer
need to.
On 24/03/2016 15:03, Jon Ribbens wrote:
On 2016-03-24, BartC wrote:
On 24/03/2016 14:08, Jon Ribbens wrote:
if you thought you needed to do that then most likely what you
should actually be doing is re-writing your code so you no longer
need to. However, you could do:
L[:] = [0] * len(L)
On 2016-03-24, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 09:49 pm, David Palao wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> Use "eval":
>> s = "(1, 2, 3, 4)"
>> t = eval(s)
>
> Don't use eval unless you absolutely, categorically, 100% trust the source
> of the string.
And then still don't use it. :)
eval is only safe
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016, at 10:49, BartC wrote:
> On 24/03/2016 14:34, Jussi Piitulainen wrote:
> > You understand correctly, but it may be more natural in practice to
> > write it this way:
> >
> > for k, item in enumerate(them):
> > them[k] = f(item)
> >
> > I _think_ I might write i
Random832 writes:
> The implementation seems very basic... I ran into trouble trying to
> store entries with no password (with the idea in mind of having my
> program prompt for the password), though, out of curiosity, does ftp
> handle your quoted passwords?
Uhm, dunno :-) I think it's been mor
On 24/03/2016 14:34, Jussi Piitulainen wrote:
BartC writes:
On 24/03/2016 14:08, Jon Ribbens wrote:
On 2016-03-24, BartC wrote:
I'd presumably have to do:
for i in range(len(L)):
L[i]=0
That's kind've a weird thing to want to do;
The thing I'm trying to demonstrate is changing a
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016, at 06:14, Lele Gaifax wrote:
> I tried to insert an entry in my ~/.netrc for an account having a
> password that contains a space, something like:
>
> machine my-host-name login myname password "My Password"
>
> The standard library netrc module does not seem able to parse i
On 24/03/2016 14:22, Matt Wheeler wrote:
The point is that one can just do `mylist.clear()`
Only in 3.3 and up. In Python 2.x you have to do it the old fashioned,
long winded way.
mylist[:] = []
--
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask
what you can do for o
On Thursday, March 24, 2016 at 7:46:55 PM UTC+5:30, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
> BartC :
>
> > And forgetting Python for a minute and concentrating only on its
> > byte-code as a language in its own right, how would you go about the
> > job of streamlining it?
> Really, your optimization efforts shoul
On 24/03/2016 14:01, Chris Angelico wrote:
I don't, until it's pointed out. At that point, someone who respects
the language will at least pay *some* heed to the changed
recommendations; what we're seeing here is that he continues to use C
idioms and then complain that Python is slow. I don't ex
BartC writes:
> On 24/03/2016 14:08, Jon Ribbens wrote:
>> On 2016-03-24, BartC wrote:
>>> I'd presumably have to do:
>>>
>>>for i in range(len(L)):
>>> L[i]=0
>>
>> That's kind've a weird thing to want to do;
>
> The thing I'm trying to demonstrate is changing an element of a list
> that
BartC :
> And forgetting Python for a minute and concentrating only on its
> byte-code as a language in its own right, how would you go about the
> job of streamlining it?
CPython's bytecode is not crucial for CPython's execution speed. The
bytecode is mainly a method of improving the performance
On 24 March 2016 at 14:04, BartC wrote:
>On 24/03/2016 13:50, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>> for i in range(len(mylist)-1, -1, 0):
>> del mylist[i]
>
> That's wouldn't be I'd call clearing a list, more like destroying it
> completely!
Look more closely. The semantics of using the del keyword with
On 24/03/2016 14:08, Jon Ribbens wrote:
On 2016-03-24, BartC wrote:
On 24/03/2016 13:50, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
Likewise clearing a list:
for i in range(len(mylist)-1, -1, 0):
del mylist[i]
That's wouldn't be I'd call clearing a list, more like destroying it
completely!
How would you
On 2016-03-24, BartC wrote:
> On 24/03/2016 13:50, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>> Likewise clearing a list:
>>
>> for i in range(len(mylist)-1, -1, 0):
>> del mylist[i]
>
> That's wouldn't be I'd call clearing a list, more like destroying it
> completely!
>
> How would you actually clear a list b
On 24/03/2016 13:50, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 02:24 pm, Chris Angelico wrote:
This is how you're currently evaluating Python. Instead of starting
with the most simple and obvious code
One problem is that what counts as "simple and obvious" depends on what you
are used to. C
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 12:50 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 02:24 pm, Chris Angelico wrote:
>
>
>> This is how you're currently evaluating Python. Instead of starting
>> with the most simple and obvious code
>
> One problem is that what counts as "simple and obvious" depends on
On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 09:49 pm, David Palao wrote:
> Hi,
> Use "eval":
> s = "(1, 2, 3, 4)"
> t = eval(s)
Don't use eval unless you absolutely, categorically, 100% trust the source
of the string.
Otherwise, you are letting the person who provided the string run any code
they like on your computer.
On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 02:24 pm, Chris Angelico wrote:
> This is how you're currently evaluating Python. Instead of starting
> with the most simple and obvious code
One problem is that what counts as "simple and obvious" depends on what you
are used to. Coming from a background of Pascal, iteratin
On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 11:10 Sven R. Kunze, wrote:
> On 24.03.2016 11:57, Matt Wheeler wrote:
> import ast
> s = "(1, 2, 3, 4)"
> t = ast.literal_eval(s)
> t
> > (1, 2, 3, 4)
>
> I suppose that's the better solution in terms of safety.
>
It has the added advantage that the enqui
On 24/03/2016 03:24, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 12:41 AM, BartC wrote:
To extend this analogy better, executing byte-code to directly perform a
task itself might be equivalent to travelling on foot, while everyone is
suggesting taking the bus, tube or taxi.
It's easy to se
On 2016-03-24, Bryon Fawcett wrote:
> Could you please advise me how to connect the python software to my default
> printer.
import os
os.popen("lpr","w").write("Hi there, this just got printed!\r\n")
--
Grant
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 09:39 pm, ast wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have a string which contains a tupe, eg:
>
> s = "(1, 2, 3, 4)"
>
> and I want to recover the tuple in a variable t
>
> t = (1, 2, 3, 4)
>
> how would you do ?
py> import ast
py> ast.literal_eval("(1, 2, 3, 4)")
(1, 2, 3, 4)
--
Steven
On 24.03.2016 11:57, Matt Wheeler wrote:
import ast
s = "(1, 2, 3, 4)"
t = ast.literal_eval(s)
t
(1, 2, 3, 4)
I suppose that's the better solution in terms of safety.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 2016-03-24 11:49, David Palao wrote:
>> s = "(1, 2, 3, 4)"
>>
>> and I want to recover the tuple in a variable t
>>
>> t = (1, 2, 3, 4)
>>
>> how would you do ?
>
> Use "eval":
> s = "(1, 2, 3, 4)"
> t = eval(s)
Using eval() has security implications. Use ast.literal_eval for
safety instead:
>>> import ast
>>> s = "(1, 2, 3, 4)"
>>> t = ast.literal_eval(s)
>>> t
(1, 2, 3, 4)
On 24 March 2016 at 10:39, ast wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have a string which contains a tupe, eg:
>
> s = "(1, 2, 3, 4)"
>
> and I want to recover the tuple in a variable t
>
> t = (1, 2, 3, 4)
>
> how would you do ?
>
>
"David Palao" a écrit dans le message de
news:mailman.86.1458816553.2244.python-l...@python.org...
Hi,
Use "eval":
s = "(1, 2, 3, 4)"
t = eval(s)
Best
Thank you
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Hi,
Use "eval":
s = "(1, 2, 3, 4)"
t = eval(s)
Best
2016-03-24 11:39 GMT+01:00 ast :
> Hi
>
> I have a string which contains a tupe, eg:
>
> s = "(1, 2, 3, 4)"
>
> and I want to recover the tuple in a variable t
>
> t = (1, 2, 3, 4)
>
> how would you do ?
>
>
> --
> https://mail.python.org/mailma
Hi
I have a string which contains a tupe, eg:
s = "(1, 2, 3, 4)"
and I want to recover the tuple in a variable t
t = (1, 2, 3, 4)
how would you do ?
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Hi all,
I tried to insert an entry in my ~/.netrc for an account having a password
that contains a space, something like:
machine my-host-name login myname password "My Password"
The standard library netrc module does not seem able to parse it, raising a
NetrcParseError. Other programs (Emacs,
Rudi Lopez Lopez :
> from struct import pack
>
> print(hex(126))
> print(pack('>H',126))
I can't see any bug. The tilde (~) has an ASCII code 126.
Marko
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 7:17 PM, Rudi Lopez Lopez wrote:
> from struct import pack
>
> print(hex(126))
> print(pack('>H',126))
Explain the bug?
ChrisA
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
from struct import pack
print(hex(126))
print(pack('>H',126))
Rudi G. Lopez
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Bruce Kirk wrote:
> Does anyone know of any existing projects on how to generate a change data
> capture on 2 very large xml files.
>
> The xml structures are the same, it is the data within the files that may
> differ.
>
> I need to take a XML file from yesterday and compare it to the XML file
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 10:57 AM, Bruce Kirk wrote:
> I agree, the challenge is the volume of the data to compare is 13. Million
> records. So it needs to be very fast
13M records is a good lot. To what extent can the data change? You may
find it easiest to do some sort of conversion to text, th
85 matches
Mail list logo
