In a message of Sat, 30 May 2015 22:35:25 -0700, ch.tanvee...@gmail.com writes:
>Hi friends,
>M Tanveer, and wanna start to learn python language, i've installed python on
>my Windows (OS) and set path to it, Now please Guide me which editor is best
>to use and what instructions should be followe
In a message of Sun, 31 May 2015 09:52:29 +1000, "Steven D'Aprano" writes:
>How many PyPy sandboxes are being used with hostile users motivated to break
>out of the sandbox?
>
>"I wrote a sandbox which I can't break out of" is different from "I wrote a
>sandbox which nobody can break out of". Javas
Hi friends,
M Tanveer, and wanna start to learn python language, i've installed python on
my Windows (OS) and set path to it, Now please Guide me which editor is best to
use and what instructions should be followed .
Best Regards: Tanveeer Ahmad
Thanks
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinf
garyr schrieb am 30.05.2015 um 22:48:
> *snip*
>
>> Compile it ("cythonize -b foo.pyx") and you'll get an extension module
>> that
>> executes faster than what SWIG would give you and keeps everything in one
>> file to improve readability.
>>
>> [1] http://cython.org/
>
> Thanks for your reply. M
On Sunday, May 31, 2015 at 10:28:39 AM UTC+5:30, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 2:46 PM, Rustom Mody wrote:
> > More to the point no language matches perfectly¹ everything that a learner
> > needs to learn.
> > Can you write a kernel module in python? (Or Haskell?)
> > Can you see
On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 2:46 PM, Rustom Mody wrote:
> More to the point no language matches perfectly¹ everything that a learner
> needs to learn.
> Can you write a kernel module in python? (Or Haskell?)
> Can you see details of machine state and transitions in python?
> Can you client-script a b
On Sunday, May 31, 2015 at 9:55:45 AM UTC+5:30, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 1:30 PM, Rustom Mody wrote:
> >
> > In a recent course I taught, I used a[0] and a[1:] to split arrays and write
> > recursive functions a la Haskell in Python.
> > Is it efficient? no
> > Is it idiomat
On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 1:30 PM, Rustom Mody wrote:
>
> In a recent course I taught, I used a[0] and a[1:] to split arrays and write
> recursive functions a la Haskell in Python.
> Is it efficient? no
> Is it idiomatic python? NO!
> Is it good to do that? That depends on one's priority.
> In mine
On Friday, May 29, 2015 at 9:32:06 PM UTC+5:30, Mike Driscoll wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been asked on several occasions to write about intermediate or advanced
> topics in Python and I was wondering what the community considers to be
> "intermediate" or "advanced". I realize we're all growing in our
davidf...@gmail.com writes:
> Thanks for the responses folks. I will briefly summarize them:...
I do think you should look at Geordi (the C++ IRC bot) that I linked.
It seems to have changed its implementation to use Docker, but either
way, lots of the the stuff it did was language independent.
--
"garyr" wrote in message
news:mkco9p$gf8$1...@speranza.aioe.org...
> I'm trying to create an extension module using SWIG. I've
> succeeded in generating a pyd file but when I import the module I get the
> error message: "SystemError: dynamic module not initialized properly." I
> added an initfoo
On 5/29/2015 9:01 AM, Mike Driscoll wrote:
I've been asked on several occasions to write about intermediate or advanced topics in Python and I
was wondering what the community considers to be "intermediate" or "advanced".
I'm trying my hand at Cython (http://cython.org/). I just know enough of
While this thread is indeed a theoretical discussion of the interpreter,
for a practical solution where you control the host environment, one might
look into OS level sandboxing like FreeBSD's Jails (not to be confused with
a simple chroot environment) along with various resource limiting
parameter
On Sat, 30 May 2015 09:24 pm, Laura Creighton wrote:
> In a message of Sat, 30 May 2015 19:00:14 +1000, "Steven D'Aprano" writes:
>>I wouldn't have imagined that the claim "it's easier to secure a small
>>language with a few features than a big language with lots of features"
>>would have been so
On Thursday, May 28, 2015 at 11:59:36 AM UTC-5, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
> Ian Kelly :
> > I think I would be more inclined to use enums. This has the advantages
> > of not creating a new set of state classes for every connection
> > instance and that each state is a singleton instance, allowing thing
On Wednesday, May 27, 2015 at 8:00:49 AM UTC-5, Todd wrote:
> On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 2:40 PM, zipher wrote:
> On Wednesday, May 27, 2015 at 6:30:16 AM UTC-5, Ben Finney wrote:
>
> > Steven D'Aprano writes:
>
> >
>
> > > On Wednesday 27 May 2015 14:39, Ben Finney wrote:
>
> > >
>
> > > > Tha
On Wednesday, May 27, 2015 at 2:39:21 AM UTC-5, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
> Chris Angelico :
>
> > Using some other name in place of "self" should definitely remain
> > *possible*, but not commonly done.
>
> You are effectively making the argument that Python has made a mistake
> by not giving "self"
On Wednesday, May 27, 2015 at 12:48:02 AM UTC-5, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Wednesday 27 May 2015 14:39, Ben Finney wrote:
>
> > zipher writes:
> >
> >> Arrgh. Sorry, that was meant privately...
> >
> > I'm glad we saw it publicly, so that we get more of an idea how you
> > treat people.
> >
On Tuesday, May 26, 2015 at 11:40:20 PM UTC-5, Ben Finney wrote:
> zipher writes:
>
> > Arrgh. Sorry, that was meant privately...
>
> I'm glad we saw it publicly, so that we get more of an idea how you
> treat people.
Ben, he asked for it. Stop assuming.
> That kind of homophobic slur is ina
"garyr" wrote in message
news:mkd7nk$isi$1...@speranza.aioe.org...
> *snip*
>
>> Compile it ("cythonize -b foo.pyx") and you'll get an extension module
>> that
>> executes faster than what SWIG would give you and keeps everything in one
>> file to improve readability.
>>
>> Stefan
>>
>>
>> [1] ht
Chris Angelico writes:
> Turing completeness isn't the whole story. How do you go about
> sandboxing a Brainf* implementation such that it can be used to
> implement Python, but can't be used to read or arbitrary files from
> your file system?
We're talking about sandboxing, so preventing the san
On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 5:32 AM, jonathon wrote:
> On 29/05/2015 16:01, Mike Driscoll wrote:
>
>>I was wondering what the community considers to be "intermediate" or "a
> dvanced".
>
> A python script that compiles python code.
What do you mean by "compiles"? Something as simple as an import
stat
On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 6:00 AM, Paul Rubin wrote:
> Steven D'Aprano writes:
>> I wouldn't have imagined that the claim "it's easier to secure a small
>> language with a few features than a big language with lots of features"
>> would have been so controversial.
>
> Consider that if the small lan
Metaclasses, abc, asyncio, ast, some of the dunder methods, eg __del__,
weakref, perhaps gc--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
In a message of Sat, 30 May 2015 20:42:49 +0200, Stefan Behnel writes:
>So here the cost of security is actually rewriting the entire language
>runtime and potentially also major parts of its ecosystem? Not exactly a
>cheap price either.
>
>Stefan
Well, the runtime is mostly generated, you don't
*snip*
> Compile it ("cythonize -b foo.pyx") and you'll get an extension module
> that
> executes faster than what SWIG would give you and keeps everything in one
> file to improve readability.
>
> Stefan
>
>
> [1] http://cython.org/
>
>
Thanks for your reply. My interest is not in computing the g
Steven D'Aprano writes:
> I wouldn't have imagined that the claim "it's easier to secure a small
> language with a few features than a big language with lots of features"
> would have been so controversial.
Consider that if the small language is Turing-complete, you can use it
to implement the bi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 29/05/2015 16:01, Mike Driscoll wrote:
>I was wondering what the community considers to be "intermediate" or "a
dvanced".
A python script that compiles python code.
jonathon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
iQIcBA
garyr schrieb am 30.05.2015 um 18:22:
> I'm trying to create an extension module using SWIG. I've
> succeeded in generating a pyd file but when I import the module I get the
> error message: "SystemError: dynamic module not initialized properly." I
> added an initfoo() function but that didn't solv
Laura Creighton schrieb am 30.05.2015 um 13:24:
> As a point of fact, We've _already got_ Topaz, a Ruby interpreter,
> Hippy, a PHP interpreter, a Prolog interpreter, a Smalltalk
> interpeter, and a javascript interpreter. Recently we got Pyket a
> Racket compiler. There also exist plenty of expe
I'm trying to create an extension module using SWIG. I've
succeeded in generating a pyd file but when I import the module I get the
error message: "SystemError: dynamic module not initialized properly." I
added an initfoo() function but that didn't solve the problem. Below are the
various files, a
Try openpyxl - I've found this to be a really nice library for interacting
with MS Excel.
On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 5:30 AM, Justin Thyme
wrote:
> Is it possible to write a Python program that will start MS Excel, create
> a spreadsheet and fill cells A1 to A10 (say) with the data in a Python
> ar
Peter Otten <__pete...@web.de> wrote:
>so both +0.0 and -0.0 would be skipped anyway.
Maybe the coder was simply aiming for visibility. The unary minus can
be hard to spot in some circumstances. e.g.: I've sneaked a unary minus
into this maths proof, which makes it horrible (although correct):
On 2015-05-30 10:30, Justin Thyme wrote:
> Is it possible to write a Python program that will start MS Excel,
> create a spreadsheet and fill cells A1 to A10 (say) with the data
> in a Python array? The answer is surely yes, but is there an
> outline of how to do it somewhere?
it depends on how
On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 10:06 PM, BartC wrote:
> On 29/05/2015 23:49, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> That's 64-bit integers, not arbitrary-precision, but that's something
>> at least. You do still need to worry about what happens when your
>> numbers get too big; in Python, you simply don't. So it's sti
Dear Group,
If I use pickle to dump my model as follows,
>>> from gensim.models import Word2Vec
>>> from nltk.corpus import brown, movie_reviews, treebank
>>> b = Word2Vec(brown.sents())
>>> import pickle
>>> f = open('my_classifier5.pickle', 'wb')
>>> pickle.dump(b, f)
>>> f.close()
>>> f1= ope
Mike Driscoll wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been asked on several occasions to write about intermediate or
> advanced topics in Python and I was wondering what the community
> considers to be "intermediate" or "advanced". I realize we're all growing
> in our abilities with the language, so this is going
On 29/05/2015 23:49, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 4:33 AM, Paul Rubin wrote:
Chris Angelico writes:
Looks to me as if Lua doesn't have integers at all
They fixed that in Lua 5.3:
http://www.lua.org/manual/5.3/readme.html#changes
That's 64-bit integers, not arbitrary-p
In a message of Sat, 30 May 2015 19:00:14 +1000, "Steven D'Aprano" writes:
>I wouldn't have imagined that the claim "it's easier to secure a small
>language with a few features than a big language with lots of features"
>would have been so controversial. I wonder if this claim will be equally as
>c
I use this:
https://pypi.python.org/pypi/xlutils
Documentation here:
http://pythonhosted.org/xlutils/
website full of advice here:
http://www.python-excel.org/
Tutorial I took at Europython where I learned a lot of stuff
http://www.simplistix.co.uk/presentations/python-excel.pdf
Laura
--
https
On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 5:40 AM, Tim Golden wrote:
> On 30/05/2015 10:30, Justin Thyme wrote:
>>
>> Is it possible to write a Python program that will start MS Excel,
>> create a spreadsheet and fill cells A1 to A10 (say) with the data in a
>> Python array? The answer is surely yes, but is there
On 30/05/2015 10:30, Justin Thyme wrote:
Is it possible to write a Python program that will start MS Excel,
create a spreadsheet and fill cells A1 to A10 (say) with the data in a
Python array? The answer is surely yes, but is there an outline of how
to do it somewhere?
This is still a good pl
Is it possible to write a Python program that will start MS Excel,
create a spreadsheet and fill cells A1 to A10 (say) with the data in a
Python array? The answer is surely yes, but is there an outline of how
to do it somewhere?
--
Shall we only threaten and be angry for an hour?
When the st
On 30.05.15 12:09, Peter Otten wrote:
Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
On 30.05.15 10:56, Peter Otten wrote:
The following modification of the collections.Counter implementation
https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/fe4efc0032b5
was just checked in with the line
result[elem] = 0 - count
Does this have a
Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
> On 30.05.15 10:56, Peter Otten wrote:
>> The following modification of the collections.Counter implementation
>>
>> https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/fe4efc0032b5
>>
>> was just checked in with the line
>>
>> result[elem] = 0 - count
>>
>> Does this have an advantage over
On Sat, 30 May 2015 02:48 pm, Paul Rubin wrote:
> Chris Angelico writes:
>> You can *easily* sandbox something that has very little functionality
>> - all you have to do is provide a minimalist "language" that permits
>> only a very few actions, and you know it's safe. But that security
>> comes
On 30.05.15 10:56, Peter Otten wrote:
The following modification of the collections.Counter implementation
https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/fe4efc0032b5
was just checked in with the line
result[elem] = 0 - count
Does this have an advantage over the obvious
result[elem] = -count
?
x = 0.
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Sat, 30 May 2015 05:56 pm, Peter Otten wrote:
>
>> The following modification of the collections.Counter implementation
>>
>> https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/fe4efc0032b5
>>
>> was just checked in with the line
>>
>> result[elem] = 0 - count
>>
>> Does this have
On Sat, 30 May 2015 05:56 pm, Peter Otten wrote:
> The following modification of the collections.Counter implementation
>
> https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/fe4efc0032b5
>
> was just checked in with the line
>
> result[elem] = 0 - count
>
> Does this have an advantage over the obvious
>
> re
The following modification of the collections.Counter implementation
https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/fe4efc0032b5
was just checked in with the line
result[elem] = 0 - count
Does this have an advantage over the obvious
result[elem] = -count
?
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pyt
50 matches
Mail list logo
