On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 5:04 PM, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
> Here's a usecase - I want to know whether I need
> to use a sudo password when the user passes a command on the command line
> of a program:
>
> someprog.py uname && sudo cat /etc/sudoers
>
> vs.
>
> someprog.py uname && echo "sudo cat /etc/su
Tim Daneliuk writes:
> Here's a usecase - I want to know whether I need to use a sudo
> password when the user passes a command on the command line of a
> program:
[…]
> In the first instance, I need the sudo passoword, in the second I don't.
I don't understand what “need a sudo password” mean
Ricardo Bánffy writes:
> I must be doing something wrong, but I (and the clever folks at the #python
> channel) can't figure what.
> ...
> Registering Appengine-Fixture-Loader to http://pypi.python.org/pypi
> Server response (401): basic auth failed
>
> So, what am I doing wrong?
I find it strang
Burak Arslan writes:
> We've gone through the grunt work of researching and integrating
> XMLDSIG, XAdES and UBL schemas and its various extensions and
> dependencies and wrote a bunch of scripts that map these documents to
> python objects.
In this context, I would like to mention "PyXB"
("https
On 11/25/2014 07:54 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
Tim Daneliuk writes:
Here's the problem: Determine is the string S appears *outside* or
*inside* any such quotation.
This is a problem for parsing text. There is no general, simple
solution.
If someone tries to convince you they have one, be highly
On 11/25/2014 07:44 PM, Tim Chase wrote:
On 2014-11-25 19:20, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
hen you find any opener, you seek its
corresponding closer, and then special-case /* to count any
additional /* and look for a */ for each one */ .
That's more or less where I was headed. I just wanted something
On 11/25/2014 07:32 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 12:18 PM, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
And what should happen with mismatched quotes?
do("th/*is", "and", "th*/at")
Match pairs as usual, and let the remaining unterminated quote run on.
Wait, what? Where's an unterminated q
On 11/25/2014 02:36 PM, Juan Christian wrote:
> So guys, I had to change to approach, I read that using Qt I can't do
> multiple inheritance. So my Outpost class can't be like 'Outpost(QObject,
> QThred)'. I had to change the code a bit:
>
> So, let's see the problems:
>
> Traceback (most recent
Tim Daneliuk writes:
> Here's the problem: Determine is the string S appears *outside* or
> *inside* any such quotation.
This is a problem for parsing text. There is no general, simple
solution.
If someone tries to convince you they have one, be highly suspicious: it
will either be not general,
On 2014-11-25 19:20, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
> > hen you find any opener, you seek its
> corresponding closer, and then special-case /* to count any
> additional /* and look for a */ for each one */ .
>
> That's more or less where I was headed. I just wanted something
> less brute force :)
This se
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 12:18 PM, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
>> And what should happen with mismatched quotes?
>>
>>do("th/*is", "and", "th*/at")
>
>
> Match pairs as usual, and let the remaining unterminated quote run on.
Wait, what? Where's an unterminated quote? I can imagine two ways of
reading
On 11/25/2014 06:40 PM, Tim Chase wrote:
On 2014-11-25 18:18, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
A problem for your consideration:
We are given a tuple of delimiter string pairs to quote or comment
text, possibly over multiple lines. Something like this:
delims = (('"', '"'), ("'", "'"), ('#', '\n'),
On 11/25/2014 06:44 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
You may have issues with your definition of nesting, though. For
instance, what's it mean if you have double-quotes, then a hash?
It means that the hash is quoted as part of the literal string.
then the only nesting you need worry about is /* and
Juan Christian wrote:
> OFF-TOPIC: You guys said that my emails had some trash HTML and strange
> stuffs, is it OK now?
You're still sending:
Content-Type: multipart/alternative
Please configure your MUA to send
Content-Type: text/plain
only.
--
Christoph M. Becker
--
https://mail.pyt
On 11/25/2014 02:31 PM, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
п'ятниця, 21-лис-2014 08:15:57 ви написали:
This looks very good indeed. As a matter of interest, is there any
particular reason you have used 2*b instead of b+b? Might b+b be faster
than b*2?
Yes, it is slightly faster, but the effect is indisce
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
> A problem for your consideration:
>
> We are given a tuple of delimiter string pairs to quote or comment text,
> possibly over multiple lines. Something like this:
>
> delims = (('"', '"'), ("'", "'"), ('#', '\n'), ("\*", "*\), ('\\', '
On 2014-11-25 18:18, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
> A problem for your consideration:
>
> We are given a tuple of delimiter string pairs to quote or comment
> text, possibly over multiple lines. Something like this:
>
> delims = (('"', '"'), ("'", "'"), ('#', '\n'), ("\*", "*\),
> ('\\', '\n') ...)
A problem for your consideration:
We are given a tuple of delimiter string pairs to quote or comment text,
possibly over multiple lines. Something like this:
delims = (('"', '"'), ("'", "'"), ('#', '\n'), ("\*", "*\), ('\\', '\n')
...)
These may be nested.
Here's the problem: Determine
So guys, I had to change to approach, I read that using Qt I can't do
multiple inheritance. So my Outpost class can't be like 'Outpost(QObject,
QThred)'. I had to change the code a bit:
from PySide.QtCore import QObject, QThread, Signal
import requests
import bs4
class Worker(QThread):
def __ini
Hi folks.
I must be doing something wrong, but I (and the clever folks at the #python
channel) can't figure what.
I'm doing a:
python setup.py register -r pypitest
And getting the following in return
running register
running egg_info
writing Appengine_Fixture_Loader.egg-info/PKG-INFO
writing t
So I have a python module that I have written which uses CFFI to link against a C library I have compiled. Specifically, it is a Database driver for the 4th dimension database, using an open-source C library distributed by the 4D company. I have tested the module and C code on a couple of different
п'ятниця, 21-лис-2014 08:15:57 ви написали:
This looks very good indeed. As a matter of interest, is there any
particular reason you have used 2*b instead of b+b? Might b+b be faster
than b*2?
Yes, it is slightly faster, but the effect is indiscernible in total
time. But
there is not harm to
On 2014-11-25 15:48, Juan Christian wrote:
On Tue Nov 25 2014 at 1:42:24 PM MRAB mailto:pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com>> wrote:
I think that the problem there is that strings don't have an __exit__
method.
I don't understand what you said, what you mean by that? =/
The traceback says:
Traceback (
On 11/25/2014 04:34 AM, Thuruv V wrote:
Please Clarify the 'TypeError: zip argument #1 must support iteration'
import openpyxl
book = openpyxl.load_workbook('c:/users/c_thv/desktop/tax.xlsx')
sheet = book.get_sheet_by_name('Thilip')
cell = sheet.cell(row=2,column = 4)
i = 2
x = []
y = []while
In Thuruv V
writes:
> Please Clarify the 'TypeError: zip argument #1 must support iteration'
> import openpyxl
> book = openpyxl.load_workbook('c:/users/c_thv/desktop/tax.xlsx')
> sheet = book.get_sheet_by_name('Thilip')
> cell = sheet.cell(row=2,column = 4)
> i = 2
> x = []
> y = []while i
In view of next edition of the Eric IDE Technical Report (forecast: 3rd
quarter '15) we'll welcome
your testimony of experiences and use of specific Eric IDE's features, such as:
– Special features of your choice, such as: SQL Browser, Qt Forms Designer,
Debug Remote Configurable,
Eric API
On Tue Nov 25 2014 at 1:42:24 PM MRAB wrote:
I think that the problem there is that strings don't have an __exit__
method.
I don't understand what you said, what you mean by that? =/
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 2014-11-25 13:58, Juan Christian wrote:
On Mon Nov 24 2014 at 11:56:31 PM Michael Torrie mailto:torr...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Looks alright. Does it work?
Well, no =/
First I had to remove the multiple inheritance, because Qt doesn't allow
that, so I removed the QObject.
Second, just for testi
Ganesh Pal wrote:
> Thanks for the hint , I was able to get the error messages on the console
> by setting the StreamHandler level to WARNING .
>
> It works for me know butone LAST question , it might sound simple,
> but Iam not able to understand the difference between
>
> - (a) ch
Archana Pandey wrote:
[...]
> A = a + 1 and a += 1 both behave in same way for all data types except
> python Lists
I cannot think of any other mutable data type that supports + but there are
mutable data types that support other augmented assignment operators:
py> a = set("abcd")
py> b = a #
Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
> Marco Buttu :
>
>> To acknowledge the OP, the statistics module deserves to be taken as
>> example for writing good comments and docstrings:
>>
>> https://hg.python.org/cpython/file/3.4/Lib/statistics.py
>
> True, it is done with good style. It concentrates on documenting
On Monday, November 24, 2014 10:26:42 AM UTC-6, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
> Benjamin Risher :
>
> > I was wondering if you ever made progress with your asyncio project.
> > I'm currently digging around for examples and reference material and
> > came across your post.
> >
> > I'd be interested in any
On Mon Nov 24 2014 at 11:56:31 PM Michael Torrie wrote:
Looks alright. Does it work?
Well, no =/
First I had to remove the multiple inheritance, because Qt doesn't allow
that, so I removed the QObject.
Second, just for testing I'm calling the module directly using:
timer = QTimer()
timer.start
Thanks for the hint , I was able to get the error messages on the console
by setting the StreamHandler level to WARNING .
It works for me know butone LAST question , it might sound simple,
but Iam not able to understand the difference between
- (a) ch.setLevel(logging.WARNING) and c
On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 12:20:26 +, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> a=[1,2,3]
binds a to the list [1,2,3]
> b=a
binds b to a
> b+=[4,5]
Changes existing b, which is also a
> x=[1,2,3]
binds x to the list [1,2,3]
> y=x
binds y to x
> y=y+[4,5]
Binds y to a new list which comprises previous y plus
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 10:56 PM, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
> I think this conversation is going nowhere, so it's probably best to end it.
\0
ChrisA
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Marco Buttu :
> To acknowledge the OP, the statistics module deserves to be taken as
> example for writing good comments and docstrings:
>
> https://hg.python.org/cpython/file/3.4/Lib/statistics.py
True, it is done with good style. It concentrates on documenting use and
lets the implementation do
On 21/11/2014 07:52, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
sohcahto...@gmail.com:
>My point was that I was making fun of CS professors that demand a
>comment on every line of code, regardless of how clear the line of
>code is.
Unfortunately, a lot of software houses do a similar thing. Not quite
every line, b
All,
We've gone through the grunt work of researching and integrating
XMLDSIG, XAdES and UBL schemas and its various extensions and
dependencies and wrote a bunch of scripts that map these documents to
python objects.
UBL stands for Universal Business Language. It's an OASIS standard that
defines
On 11/25/2014 04:23 AM, PANDEY2 Archana (MORPHO) wrote:
Hello
Welcome. This is apparently your first post, or at least first for
quite a while.
Note that this is a text forum (usenet, mailing list), and doesn't
properly support either html messages nor attachments. Just tell your
mailer
On 25/11/2014 11:44, Archana Pandey wrote:
Hello
I hereby would like to share the problem I have faced regarding python
list implementation :-
As per python documentation python list is mutable data object.
The problem I found with the list is that is behaves differently when we
use ‘+=’ and ‘
On 25/11/2014 11:40, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
PANDEY2 Archana (MORPHO) wrote:
Hello
I hereby would like to share the problem I have found regarding python
list implementation:-
As per python documentation python list is mutable data object.
That problem I found with the list is that is behaves
Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
> Steven D'Aprano :
>
>> Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
>>
Py3's byte strings are still strings, though.
>>>
>>> Hm. I don't think so. In a plain English sense, maybe, but that kind of
>>> usage can lead to confusion.
>>
>> Only if you are determined to confuse yourself.
>>
>>
PANDEY2 Archana (MORPHO) wrote:
> Hello
>
> I hereby would like to share the problem I have found regarding python
> list implementation:-
>
> As per python documentation python list is mutable data object.
>
> That problem I found with the list is that is behaves differently when we
> use '+='
Hello
I hereby would like to share the problem I have faced regarding python
list implementation :-
As per python documentation python list is mutable data object.
The problem I found with the list is that is behaves differently when we
use ‘+=’ and ‘+’ ‘=’ operators separately.
For example-
Thuruv V wrote:
> Please Clarify the 'TypeError: zip argument #1 must support iteration'
Try it at the interactive interpreter:
py> zip('abc', [1, 2, 3]) # works fine
[('a', 1), ('b', 2), ('c', 3)]
But:
py> zip(1000, [1, 2, 3]) # fails
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "", line 1, i
Please Clarify the 'TypeError: zip argument #1 must support iteration'
import openpyxl
book = openpyxl.load_workbook('c:/users/c_thv/desktop/tax.xlsx')
sheet = book.get_sheet_by_name('Thilip')
cell = sheet.cell(row=2,column = 4)
i = 2
x = []
y = []while i < 10:
keys = sheet.cell(row=i,column
Hello
I hereby would like to share the problem I have found regarding python list
implementation:-
As per python documentation python list is mutable data object.
That problem I found with the list is that is behaves differently when we use
'+=' and '+' '=' operators separately.
For example-
48 matches
Mail list logo
