Op 30-06-13 23:57, Joshua Landau schreef:
On 30 June 2013 20:58, Robert Kern wrote:
On 2013-06-30 18:24, Νίκος wrote:
Στις 29/6/2013 8:00 μμ, ο/η Mark Lawrence έγραψε:
Why this when the approach to Nick the Incompetant Greek has been to
roll out the red carpet?
Your mother is incompetent
Op 30-06-13 22:14, Νίκος schreef:
Στις 30/6/2013 10:58 μμ, ο/η Robert Kern έγραψε:
On 2013-06-30 18:24, Νίκος wrote:
Στις 29/6/2013 8:00 μμ, ο/η Mark Lawrence έγραψε:
Why this when the approach to Nick the Incompetant Greek has been to
roll out the red carpet?
Your mother is incompetent who
On 30/06/2013 3:46 PM, Ian Kelly wrote:
In general I agree, although when reading code I would definitely
prefer if the locals were declared.
If you import the code into the interpreter as an adjunct to reading it
you can see the locals with:
>>> somefunc.func_code.co_varnames # 2.x
>>> somefu
Hi,
I've been using the settrace function to write a tracer for my program, which
is working great except that it doesn't seem to work for built-in functions,
like open('filename.txt'). This doesn't seem to be documented, so I'm not sure
if I'm doing something wrong or that's the expected beh
http://jugad2.blogspot.com/2013/07/python-meet-turtle.html
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 8:17 AM, wrote:
>
> i just want something simple that basicly asks for a password and then
> replies to u if you are wrong nothing hevay just for learning exsperience
> --
Then your task is pretty easy. Look up these things in the Python docs:
* input (or raw_input if yo
On Sunday, June 30, 2013 2:25:51 PM UTC-5, Modulok wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Jun 2013 10:28:47 -0700 (PDT), gmsi...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > I was wondering if there was a couple of words or things i
> > could add to the top of my python script to password
>
> > protect it so that it asks user for the pa
On 2013-06-30 22:57, Joshua Landau wrote:
On 30 June 2013 20:58, Robert Kern wrote:
On 2013-06-30 18:24, Νίκος wrote:
Στις 29/6/2013 8:00 μμ, ο/η Mark Lawrence έγραψε:
Why this when the approach to Nick the Incompetant Greek has been to
roll out the red carpet?
Your mother is incompetent
On 30 June 2013 20:58, Robert Kern wrote:
> On 2013-06-30 18:24, Νίκος wrote:
>>
>> Στις 29/6/2013 8:00 μμ, ο/η Mark Lawrence έγραψε:
>>
>>> Why this when the approach to Nick the Incompetant Greek has been to
>>> roll out the red carpet?
>>
>>
>> Your mother is incompetent who raised a brat like
On 30 June 2013 18:36, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
> Pfft! Where's the challenge in that? Let's use an O(n!) algorithm for
> sorting -- yes, n factorial -- AND abuse a generator expression for its
> side effect. As a bonus, we use itertools, and just for the lulz, I
> obfuscate as many of the names as
On 2013-06-30 21:14, Νίκος wrote:
Στις 30/6/2013 10:58 μμ, ο/η Robert Kern έγραψε:
On 2013-06-30 18:24, Νίκος wrote:
Στις 29/6/2013 8:00 μμ, ο/η Mark Lawrence έγραψε:
Why this when the approach to Nick the Incompetant Greek has been to
roll out the red carpet?
Your mother is incompetent who
Στις 30/6/2013 10:58 μμ, ο/η Robert Kern έγραψε:
On 2013-06-30 18:24, Νίκος wrote:
Στις 29/6/2013 8:00 μμ, ο/η Mark Lawrence έγραψε:
Why this when the approach to Nick the Incompetant Greek has been to
roll out the red carpet?
Your mother is incompetent who raised a brat like you.
That is
On 2013-06-30 18:24, Νίκος wrote:
Στις 29/6/2013 8:00 μμ, ο/η Mark Lawrence έγραψε:
Why this when the approach to Nick the Incompetant Greek has been to
roll out the red carpet?
Your mother is incompetent who raised a brat like you.
That is not acceptable behavior on this list. Please keep
It appears you are using a 32 bit compiler with a 64-bit python.
Install a 32 bit python.
On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Akshay Kayastha wrote:
> Hi I am trying to compile a python module called hunspell from the following
> [source](https://pypi.python.org/pypi/hunspell).
>
> But I get the f
On Sat, 29 Jun 2013 10:28:47 -0700 (PDT), gmsid...@gmail.com wrote:
> I was wondering if there was a couple of words or things i
> could add to the top of my python script to password
> protect it so that it asks user for the password and then
> after three tries it locks them out or says "access
>
On 30/06/2013 19:53, Andrew Berg wrote:
On 2013.06.30 13:46, Andrew Z wrote:
Hello,
print max(-10, 10)
10
print max('-10', 10)
-10
My guess max converts string to number bye decoding each of the characters to
it's ASCII equivalent?
Where can i read more on exactly how the situations like the
On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Andrew Z wrote:
> Hello,
>
> print max(-10, 10)
> 10
> print max('-10', 10)
> -10
>
> My guess max converts string to number bye decoding each of the characters
> to it's ASCII equivalent?
No, it leaves the types as they are but simply considers strings to be
"gr
On 30-6-2013 20:46, Andrew Z wrote:
> Hello,
>
> print max(-10, 10)
> 10
> print max('-10', 10)
> -10
>
> My guess max converts string to number bye decoding each of the characters to
> it's ASCII
> equivalent?
>
> Where can i read more on exactly how the situations like these are dealt with?
>
On 2013.06.30 13:46, Andrew Z wrote:
> Hello,
>
> print max(-10, 10)
> 10
> print max('-10', 10)
> -10
>
> My guess max converts string to number bye decoding each of the characters to
> it's ASCII equivalent?
>
> Where can i read more on exactly how the situations like these are dealt with?
Th
Hello,
print max(-10, 10)
10
print max('-10', 10)
-10
My guess max converts string to number bye decoding each of the characters
to it's ASCII equivalent?
Where can i read more on exactly how the situations like these are dealt
with?
Thank you
AZ
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pyth
On Sat, 29 Jun 2013 10:28:47 -0700 (PDT), gmsid...@gmail.com wrote:
> I was wondering if there was a couple of words or things i
> could add to the top of my python script to password
> protect it so that it asks user for the password and then
> after three tries it locks them out or says "access
>
On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 11:25 AM, Antoon Pardon
wrote:
>>> So what do you think would be a good approach towards people
>>> who are behaving in conflict with this wish of yours? Just
>>> bluntly call them worse than the troll or try to approach them
>>> in a way that is less likely to antangonize
In article <51d06cb6$0$2$c3e8da3$54964...@news.astraweb.com>,
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Jun 2013 16:06:35 +1000, Chris Angelico wrote:
>
> > So, here's a challenge: Come up with something really simple, and write
> > an insanely complicated - yet perfectly valid - way to achieve t
On Sun, 30 Jun 2013 16:06:35 +1000, Chris Angelico wrote:
> So, here's a challenge: Come up with something really simple, and write
> an insanely complicated - yet perfectly valid - way to achieve the same
> thing. Bonus points for horribly abusing Python's clean syntax in the
> process.
Here's a
Op 28-06-13 19:20, Ian Kelly schreef:
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 12:13 PM, Antoon Pardon
wrote:
So what do you think would be a good approach towards people
who are behaving in conflict with this wish of yours? Just
bluntly call them worse than the troll or try to approach them
in a way that is l
On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 9:20 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> Yeah, I cannot seriously imagine that the stdlib does anything like
> the example I gave :) Pity nobody else is offering further examples, I
> thought this might be a fun thread.
Well, there is the "this" module. But its code is not *that*
Στις 29/6/2013 8:00 μμ, ο/η Mark Lawrence έγραψε:
Why this when the approach to Nick the Incompetant Greek has been to
roll out the red carpet?
Your mother is incompetent who raised a brat like you.
--
What is now proved was at first only imagined!
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo
On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 4:07 AM, Antoon Pardon
> wrote:
>> I don't think this reference is as strong as you think it is. Here is
>> a paragraph somewhat lower:
>>
>> ] If a name is bound in a block, it is a local variable of that block,
>> ] un
On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 4:07 AM, Antoon Pardon
wrote:
> I don't think this reference is as strong as you think it is. Here is
> a paragraph somewhat lower:
>
> ] If a name is bound in a block, it is a local variable of that block,
> ] unless declared as nonlocal. If a name is bound at the module l
Haha... nooo I already use Linux. But I am currently doing a project that
required me to run my script on Windows as well as Linux. TO be precise I am
supposed to create a stand alone executable for my script which runs great on
Linux, but to create one for Windows I need to be able to run the s
On Sunday, June 30, 2013 7:08:51 AM UTC+5:30, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 9:40 PM, Roy Smith wrote:
> > for host in hosts:
> >deploy(the_code).remote()
>
> For further hack delight, require a patch
> Submitted for this code restrict itself
> To five feet, neither more nor
On Sunday, June 30, 2013 9:24:46 PM UTC+5:30, Akshay Kayastha wrote:
> Hi I am trying to compile a python module called hunspell from the following
> [source](https://pypi.python.org/pypi/hunspell).
>
According to
http://docs.python.org/2/extending/windows.html
you need to use the same compiler
Hi I am trying to compile a python module called hunspell from the following
[source](https://pypi.python.org/pypi/hunspell).
But I get the following error message.
C:\Users\KURO\Desktop\hunspell-0.1>setup.py install
running install
running build
running build_ext
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 1:08 AM, Joshua Landau
wrote:
> On 30 June 2013 15:58, Rick Johnson wrote:
>> Chris, i'm sorry, but your challenge is decades too late. If you seek
>> amusement you need look no further than the Python stdlib. If you REALLY
>> want to be amused, peruse the "idlelib" -- no
On 30 June 2013 15:58, Rick Johnson wrote:
> Chris, i'm sorry, but your challenge is decades too late. If you seek
> amusement you need look no further than the Python stdlib. If you REALLY want
> to be amused, peruse the "idlelib" -- not only is the code obfuscated, it
> also breaks PEP8 and t
On Sunday, June 30, 2013 1:06:35 AM UTC-5, Chris Angelico wrote:
> So, here's a challenge: Come up with something really simple, and
> write an insanely complicated - yet perfectly valid - way to achieve
> the same thing. Bonus points for horribly abusing Python's clean
> syntax in the process.
Ch
On behalf of Twisted Matrix Laboratories, I am pleased to announce the
release of
Twisted 13.1.
Highlights for this release include:
* trial now has an --exitfirst flag which stops the test run after the
first error or failure.
* twisted.internet.ssl.CertificateOptions now supports chain ce
On Sun, 30 Jun 2013 13:20:24 +0200, Peter Otten wrote:
Thanks a lot!
Helmut.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Sunday, June 30, 2013 4:52:24 PM UTC+5:30, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Jun 2013 01:56:25 -0700, rusi wrote:
> > Now having such passes is one thing. Defining the language in terms of
> > them quite another...
>
>
> I don't believe that Python's behaviour is defined in terms of the numb
On Sun, 30 Jun 2013 01:56:25 -0700, rusi wrote:
[...]
> All of which adds up to making scoping/variables an arcane craft.
>
> Now having such passes is one thing. Defining the language in terms of
> them quite another...
I don't believe that Python's behaviour is defined in terms of the number
Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a strange error. When I try import idlelib.PyShell from Python3.3
> it fails with
>
> Python 3.3.2+ (3.3:68ff68f9a0d5+, Jun 30 2013, 12:59:15)
> [GCC 4.7.3] on linux
> Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
import idlel
Hi,
I have a strange error. When I try import idlelib.PyShell from Python3.3 it
fails
with
Python 3.3.2+ (3.3:68ff68f9a0d5+, Jun 30 2013, 12:59:15)
[GCC 4.7.3] on linux
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> import idlelib.PyShell
Traceback (most recent call
Op 29-06-13 21:23, Ian Kelly schreef:
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Antoon Pardon
wrote:
Op 29-06-13 16:02, Michael Torrie schreef:
The real problem here is that you don't understand how python variables
work. And in fact, python does not have variables. It has names that
bind to obje
On 30Jun2013 16:06, Chris Angelico wrote:
| So, here's a challenge: Come up with something really simple, and
| write an insanely complicated - yet perfectly valid - way to achieve
| the same thing. Bonus points for horribly abusing Python's clean
| syntax in the process.
_Must_ you turn this int
On Sunday, June 30, 2013 2:23:35 AM UTC+5:30, Terry Reedy wrote:
>
>
>
> If, in the general case, the compiler requires two passes to understand
> a function body, then *so do people*#. This requirement is what trips up
> people who are either not used to the idea of two-pass compilation or do
On Sunday, June 30, 2013 10:38:01 AM UTC+5:30, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 2:32 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
> > One of the reasons I switched to Python was to not have to do that, or
> > hardly ever. For valid code, an new declaration is hardly needed. Parameters
> > are locals. If
46 matches
Mail list logo
