On Jul 18, 5:46 am, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 17/07/2012 19:36, Lipska the Kat wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 17/07/12 19:18, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> >> On 17/07/2012 18:29, Ethan Furman wrote:
> >>> Terry Reedy wrote:
> On 7/17/2012 10:23 AM, Lipska the Kat wrote:
>
> > Well 'type-bondag
MRAB wrote:
On 18/07/2012 03:19, Ethan Furman wrote:
MRAB wrote:
On 17/07/2012 23:57, Ethan Furman wrote:
In Foxpro if you do a
GOTO 7
with deleted off and record 7 is deleted, the record pointer doesn't
move (at least in version 6).
I don't like that.
I see four other options:
0) don't m
在 2012年7月17日星期二UTC+8下午6时02分31秒,Stefan Behnel写道:
> Matej Cepl, 17.07.2012 11:39:
> > On 17/07/12 10:35, gaodexiaozh...@gmail.com wrote:
> >>> > I'm trying to parse an xml file with jython
> (not through java
> >>> parsers
> >>> > like xerces).
> >
> > https://code.google.com/p/jython-ele
On 18/07/2012 03:19, Ethan Furman wrote:
MRAB wrote:
On 17/07/2012 23:57, Ethan Furman wrote:
In Foxpro if you do a
GOTO 7
with deleted off and record 7 is deleted, the record pointer doesn't
move (at least in version 6).
I don't like that.
I see four other options:
0) don't move the point
On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 05:23:22 -0700, Michele Simionato wrote:
> The standard is to use `cls`. In the __new__ method you can use `mcl` or
> `meta`.
Thanks to everyone who answered.
I think I will stick with "meta" and "cls".
--
Steven
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 18/07/12 11:44, Maria Hanna Carmela Dionisio wrote:
mmdionisio1...@yahoo.com.ph
Just a newbhie here :>
[snip]
You must know your password to change your options (including changing
the password, itself) or to unsubscribe. It is:
sweet103093
I suggest you change you password now th
MRAB wrote:
On 17/07/2012 23:57, Ethan Furman wrote:
In Foxpro if you do a
GOTO 7
with deleted off and record 7 is deleted, the record pointer doesn't
move (at least in version 6).
I don't like that.
I see four other options:
0) don't move the pointer (listed for completeness)
1) go to that
Ian Kelly wrote:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Ethan Furman wrote:
In Foxpro if you do a
GOTO 7
with deleted off and record 7 is deleted, the record pointer doesn't
move (at least in version 6).
I don't like that.
I see four other options:
0) don't move the pointer (listed for completen
mmdionisio1...@yahoo.com.ph
Just a newbhie here :>
From: "python-list-requ...@python.org"
To: mmdionisio1...@yahoo.com.ph
Sent: Saturday, July 7, 2012 7:41 PM
Subject: Welcome to the "Python-list" mailing list
Welcome to the Python-list@python.org mailing l
On Jul 17, 6:23 pm, Andrew Berg wrote:
> On 7/17/2012 2:08 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> > The default behaviour is that every object is something, hence true-like,
> > unless explicitly coded to be treated as false-like. Since both loggers
> > and functions are objects, they are true-like unless t
On 17/07/2012 19:36, Lipska the Kat wrote:
> On 17/07/12 19:18, Mark Lawrence wrote:
>> On 17/07/2012 18:29, Ethan Furman wrote:
>>> Terry Reedy wrote:
On 7/17/2012 10:23 AM, Lipska the Kat wrote:
> Well 'type-bondage' is a strange way of thinking about compile time
> type
> c
On 17/07/2012 23:57, Ethan Furman wrote:
In Foxpro if you do a
GOTO 7
with deleted off and record 7 is deleted, the record pointer doesn't
move (at least in version 6).
I don't like that.
I see four other options:
0) don't move the pointer (listed for completeness)
1) go to that record anywa
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Ethan Furman wrote:
> In Foxpro if you do a
>
> GOTO 7
>
> with deleted off and record 7 is deleted, the record pointer doesn't
> move (at least in version 6).
>
> I don't like that.
>
> I see four other options:
>
> 0) don't move the pointer (listed for completene
In Foxpro if you do a
GOTO 7
with deleted off and record 7 is deleted, the record pointer doesn't
move (at least in version 6).
I don't like that.
I see four other options:
0) don't move the pointer (listed for completeness)
1) go to that record anyway
2) go to the next undeleted record
3) go
To clarify my "problem", I just thought that assertRaises if used as
context manager should behave as following:
- keep going if the exception declared is raised
- re-raise an error even if catched after the declared exception was catched
I was also confused by the doc a bit:
"Test that an excep
On 07/17/2012 11:44 PM, André Panisson wrote:
Hi all,
I'm having a strange behavior when executing the following script:
---
import multiprocessing
def f(i):
return i
p = multiprocessing.Pool()
for i in range(20):
def c(r):
print r, i
p.apply_async(f
nuffi,
Have you tried running your piped commands
c:\Programs\bob\bob.exe -x -y "C:\text\path\to some\file.txt" |
c:\Programs\kate\kate.exe -A 2 --dc "Print Media Is Dead" --da "Author"
--dt "Title" --hf "Times" --bb "14" --aa "" --font "Ariel" -
"C:\rtf\path\to some\file.rtf"
in a single i
Hi all,
I'm having a strange behavior when executing the following script:
---
import multiprocessing
def f(i):
return i
p = multiprocessing.Pool()
for i in range(20):
def c(r):
print r, i
p.apply_async(f, (i,) , callback=c)
p.close()
p.join()
---
> On 17/07/2012 18:49, Prasad, Ramit wrote:
> >>> import unittest
> >>>
> >>> class TestWithRaises(unittest.TestCase):
> >>> def test_first(self):
> >>> assert False
> >>>
> >>> def test_second(self):
> >>> print("also called")
> >>> assert True
> >>>
> >>>
In article <5005927a$0$6949$e4fe5...@news2.news.xs4all.nl>,
Hans Mulder wrote:
> On 17/07/12 15:47:05, Naser Nikandish wrote:
> > I am trying to install Python 2.6 on Mac OS Lion. Here is what I did:
> >
> > 1- Download Mac Installer disk image (2.6) (sig) from
> >http://www.python.org/get
On 17/07/12 20:39, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 17/07/2012 20:29, Lipska the Kat wrote:
On 17/07/12 18:07, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 7/17/2012 10:23 AM, Lipska the Kat wrote:
snip
How easy was it to write max, or a universal sort in Java?
Well java.lang.Math.max() (or min() depending on what you
On 17/07/2012 19:43, Ethan Furman wrote:
Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 17/07/2012 18:29, Ethan Furman wrote:
Terry Reedy wrote:
On 7/17/2012 10:23 AM, Lipska the Kat wrote:
Well 'type-bondage' is a strange way of thinking about compile
time type
checking and making code easier to read (and theref
On 17/07/2012 20:29, Lipska the Kat wrote:
On 17/07/12 18:07, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 7/17/2012 10:23 AM, Lipska the Kat wrote:
Well 'type-bondage' is a strange way of thinking about compile time type
checking and making code easier to read (and therefor debug
snip
How easy was it to writ
On 17/07/2012 19:43, Ethan Furman wrote:
Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 17/07/2012 18:29, Ethan Furman wrote:
Terry Reedy wrote:
On 7/17/2012 10:23 AM, Lipska the Kat wrote:
Well 'type-bondage' is a strange way of thinking about compile time
type
checking and making code easier to read (and therefo
On 17/07/12 18:07, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 7/17/2012 10:23 AM, Lipska the Kat wrote:
Well 'type-bondage' is a strange way of thinking about compile time type
checking and making code easier to read (and therefor debug
snip
How easy was it to write max, or a universal sort in Java?
Well ja
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
> 'type-bondage' is the requirement to restrict function inputs and output to
> one declared type, where the type declaration mechanisms are usually quite
> limited.
This is interesting, I hadn't expected that sort of definition. So
Haskell is n
On 17/07/12 19:18, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 17/07/2012 18:29, Ethan Furman wrote:
Terry Reedy wrote:
On 7/17/2012 10:23 AM, Lipska the Kat wrote:
Well 'type-bondage' is a strange way of thinking about compile time
type
checking and making code easier to read (and therefor debug
'type-bondage
On 7/17/2012 5:06 AM, andrea crotti wrote:
Well this is what I meant:
import unittest
class TestWithRaises(unittest.TestCase):
def test_first(self):
assert False
def test_second(self):
print("also called")
assert True
if __name__ == '__main__':
unitt
Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 17/07/2012 18:29, Ethan Furman wrote:
Terry Reedy wrote:
On 7/17/2012 10:23 AM, Lipska the Kat wrote:
Well 'type-bondage' is a strange way of thinking about compile time
type
checking and making code easier to read (and therefor debug
'type-bondage' is the requireme
On 17/07/12 18:24, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 7/17/2012 8:01 AM, Lipska the Kat wrote:
On 17/07/12 09:45, Lipska the Kat wrote:
Pythoners
Python 2.7.3
Ubuntu Linux 12.04 LTS
I've been taking a brief look at Python.
snip
>>
Well I've set myself a task.
I have a text file containing a list of s
On 17/07/2012 18:29, Ethan Furman wrote:
Terry Reedy wrote:
On 7/17/2012 10:23 AM, Lipska the Kat wrote:
Well 'type-bondage' is a strange way of thinking about compile time type
checking and making code easier to read (and therefor debug
'type-bondage' is the requirement to restrict function
On 17/07/2012 18:49, Prasad, Ramit wrote:
import unittest
class TestWithRaises(unittest.TestCase):
def test_first(self):
assert False
def test_second(self):
print("also called")
assert True
if __name__ == '__main__':
unittest.main()
in this case
On 07/17/12 12:29, Ethan Furman wrote:
> Terry Reedy wrote:
>> On 7/17/2012 10:23 AM, Lipska the Kat wrote:
>>
>>> Well 'type-bondage' is a strange way of thinking about compile time type
>>> checking and making code easier to read (and therefor debug
>>
>> 'type-bondage' is the requirement to rest
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 12:23 AM, Lipska the Kat
wrote:
> Well 'type-bondage' is a strange way of thinking about compile time type
> checking and making code easier to read (and therefor debug) but
> I'm not about to get into some religious war about declaring a variables
> type.
There are option
On 7/17/2012 12:30 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
> (In some ways, it is already better than 3.2.3.)
I certainly make heavy use of some of the new features. I'm not sure we
can have enough separate exceptions for OS errors without exhausting
every possibility and I might start looking for excuses to use th
On 7/17/2012 4:23 AM, Andrew Berg wrote:
On 7/17/2012 2:08 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
The default behaviour is that every object is something, hence true-like,
unless explicitly coded to be treated as false-like. Since both loggers
and functions are objects, they are true-like unless the default
On 07/17/12 12:24, Terry Reedy wrote:
> On 7/17/2012 8:01 AM, Lipska the Kat wrote:
>> In bash this is laughably trivial
>>
>> sort -nr $1 | head -${2:-10}
>
> Won't sort work alphabetically and leave the following as is?
>
> 1\talpha
> 11\tbeta
> 2\tgamma
Only if Lipska had omitted the "-n" whi
> > import unittest
> >
> > class TestWithRaises(unittest.TestCase):
> > def test_first(self):
> > assert False
> >
> > def test_second(self):
> > print("also called")
> > assert True
> >
> > if __name__ == '__main__':
> > unittest.main()
> >
> > in this ca
On 17/07/2012 18:24, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 7/17/2012 8:01 AM, Lipska the Kat wrote:
On 17/07/12 09:45, Lipska the Kat wrote:
Pythoners
Python 2.7.3
Ubuntu Linux 12.04 LTS
I've been taking a brief look at Python.
snip
Well I've set myself a task.
I have a text file containing a list of sto
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 7:34 PM, wrote:
> It's so fundamental to most GUIs that single-click
> and double-click allow one to do different things with the same object
Kinda yes, kinda no. Most GUIs and GUI recommendations would either
enforce or strongly suggest that the double-click action incor
Terry Reedy wrote:
On 7/17/2012 10:23 AM, Lipska the Kat wrote:
Well 'type-bondage' is a strange way of thinking about compile time type
checking and making code easier to read (and therefor debug
'type-bondage' is the requirement to restrict function inputs and output
to one declared type,
On 7/17/2012 10:16 AM, Andrew Berg wrote:
On 7/17/2012 9:01 AM, Lipska the Kat wrote:
Wow, that was a blast from the past
Just downloaded, unzipped, untarred, configured, made and installed
python 3.2.3 ... it's YEARS since I've done this, makes me feel young again.
Most Linux distributions s
On 7/17/2012 8:01 AM, Lipska the Kat wrote:
On 17/07/12 09:45, Lipska the Kat wrote:
Pythoners
Python 2.7.3
Ubuntu Linux 12.04 LTS
I've been taking a brief look at Python.
snip
Well I've set myself a task.
I have a text file containing a list of stock items
each line contains the number in
On 7/17/2012 10:23 AM, Lipska the Kat wrote:
Well 'type-bondage' is a strange way of thinking about compile time type
checking and making code easier to read (and therefor debug
'type-bondage' is the requirement to restrict function inputs and output
to one declared type, where the type decla
On Jul 17, 9:32 am, Shamefaced wrote:
> Hi,
> Any reason why a blank Tk() window opens up when I run my code:
> Code:
> for run in range(RUNS):
> waittime = Monitor2()
> checkouttime = Monitor2()
> totaltimeinshop = Monitor2()
> checkout_aisle = Simulation.Resource(AISLES)
> Si
On 17/07/12 17:26, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 17/07/2012 15:23, Lipska the Kat wrote:
On 17/07/12 14:52, Roy Smith wrote:
snip
Still, I'm sure you're only kidding around with me :-)
Kidding around on a Python mailing list, never, how dare you Sir, simply
wouldn't be cricket :-)
As in "The
Hi,
Any reason why a blank Tk() window opens up when I run my code:
Code:
for run in range(RUNS):
waittime = Monitor2()
checkouttime = Monitor2()
totaltimeinshop = Monitor2()
checkout_aisle = Simulation.Resource(AISLES)
Simulation.initialize()
cf = Customer_Market()
Simu
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 12:10 AM, alex23 wrote:
> On Jul 17, 1:29 am, Steven D'Aprano +comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info> wrote:
>> Here's a style question for you: in a metaclass, what should I call the
>> instance parameter of methods, "cls" or "self"?
>
> Maybe portmanteu it as "clasself"? :)
Wh
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 6:23 AM, Michele Simionato
wrote:
> The standard is to use `cls`. In the __new__ method you can use `mcl` or
> `meta`.
I've also seen `mcs` a fair amount.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 17/07/12 15:47:05, Naser Nikandish wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to install Python 2.6 on Mac OS Lion. Here is what I did:
>
> 1- Download Mac Installer disk image (2.6) (sig) from
>http://www.python.org/getit/releases/2.6/
>
> 2- Install it
>
> 3- Run Python Luncher, go to Python Lunch
On 17/07/2012 15:23, Lipska the Kat wrote:
On 17/07/12 14:52, Roy Smith wrote:
In article<-8sdnvrxgqie25jnnz2dnuvz7qkdn...@bt.com>,
Lipska the Kat wrote:
I'm not used to using variables without declaring their type
If you truly wanted to recreate this type-bondage style of programming
in
On Tuesday, July 17, 2012 06:55:21 AM Sarbjit singh wrote:
> I am having a problem configuring a listbox widget such that the selection
> remains highlighted even while it is set (programmatically) to the
DISABLED
> state. Below code shows the problem:
>
> from Tkinter import *
> master = Tk()
>
On 17/07/12 15:16, Andrew Berg wrote:
On 7/17/2012 9:01 AM, Lipska the Kat wrote:
Wow, that was a blast from the past
Just downloaded, unzipped, untarred, configured, made and installed
python 3.2.3 ... it's YEARS since I've done this, makes me feel young again.
Most Linux distributions should
On 17/07/12 14:52, Roy Smith wrote:
In article<-8sdnvrxgqie25jnnz2dnuvz7qkdn...@bt.com>,
Lipska the Kat wrote:
I'm not used to using variables without declaring their type
If you truly wanted to recreate this type-bondage style of programming
in Python, it's easy enough to do.
snip
Well
On 7/17/2012 9:01 AM, Lipska the Kat wrote:
> Wow, that was a blast from the past
> Just downloaded, unzipped, untarred, configured, made and installed
> python 3.2.3 ... it's YEARS since I've done this, makes me feel young again.
Most Linux distributions should have a premade package for stable P
Chris Rebert於 2012年7月16日星期一UTC+8上午9時38分53秒寫道:
> On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 6:26 PM, hamilton wrote:
> > Subject: Diagramming code
> >
> > Is there any software to help understand python code ?
>
> What sort of diagrams? Control flow diagrams? Class diagrams? Sequence
> diagrams
On 17/07/12 12:37, Andrew Berg wrote:
On 7/17/2012 6:01 AM, Lipska the Kat wrote:
snip
On a side note, I would highly recommend learning Python 3 (3.2 is the
latest stable version) unless you have an explicit need for Python 2
(some major 3rd-party libraries have not been ported yet). Python
I am having a problem configuring a listbox widget such that the selection
remains highlighted even while it is set (programmatically) to the DISABLED
state. Below code shows the problem:
from Tkinter import *
master = Tk()
listbox = Listbox(master)
listbox.pack()
listbox.insert(END, "Text1")
In article <-8sdnvrxgqie25jnnz2dnuvz7qkdn...@bt.com>,
Lipska the Kat wrote:
> I'm not used to using variables without declaring their type
If you truly wanted to recreate this type-bondage style of programming
in Python, it's easy enough to do.
Where you would write in C++:
// Type matching
Hi,
I am trying to install Python 2.6 on Mac OS Lion. Here is what I did:
1- Download Mac Installer disk image (2.6) (sig) from
http://www.python.org/getit/releases/2.6/
2- Install it
3- Run Python Luncher, go to Python Luncher preferences, and change the
interpreter to Library/Framewor
On 17/07/2012 12:44, Lipska the Kat wrote:
You're not kidding, the 'duck' example at
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duck_typing made me check I hadn't overdone
the medication this morning. That is just plain ...weird. It will take
me a while to form non knee jerk opinions of this for sure.
Lipska
On 17/07/2012 12:01, Lipska the Kat wrote:
Anyway, I'm looking at Python as a rapid prototyping language.
Lipska
One of the huge advantages of Python here is that you can simply blast
stuff into the interactive prompt and see what happens, no need to write
a script.
--
Cheers.
Mark Lawr
Am 17.07.2012 13:01, schrieb Lipska the Kat:
On 17/07/12 10:30, Ulrich Eckhardt wrote:
Am 17.07.2012 10:45, schrieb Lipska the Kat:
I was expecting (hoping) to see in depth documentation relating to Class
construction, extension mechanisms and runtime polymorphism.
In addition to this forum f
Not really. It doesn't quack like anything.
Actually, there is no "it". So we cannot talk about how it quacks. :-D
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 2012-07-17 10:23, Andrew Berg wrote:
I don't want that, but I am suggesting that it would be consistent with
the idea of "something or nothing".
Don't confuse names and objects. You can only test the truth value of
objects. If you don't have a name in a namespace, then it means you
don't hav
Andrew Berg wrote:
To put it in duck-typing terms, why should everything have to quack like
True or False? Sure, I can see why 1 quacks like True or [] quacks like
False, but I don't see why say, a Logger or function should quack like
either. Should a Thread object be True if it's been started an
The standard is to use `cls`. In the __new__ method you can use `mcl` or `meta`.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 17/07/12 09:45, Lipska the Kat wrote:
Pythoners
Python 2.7.3
Ubuntu Linux 12.04 LTS
I've been taking a brief look at Python.
snip
Well I've set myself a task.
I have a text file containing a list of stock items
each line contains the number in stock followed by a tab followed by the
nam
On 7/17/2012 6:44 AM, Lipska the Kat wrote:
> I'll check it out, thanks.
I forgot to add this:
http://wiki.python.org/moin/Python2orPython3
It's a little outdated (there is more progress toward py3k by 3rd-party
libraries every day), but still quite helpful.
--
CPython 3.3.0b1 | Windows NT 6.1.76
On 17/07/12 12:37, Andrew Berg wrote:
On 7/17/2012 6:01 AM, Lipska the Kat wrote:
Anyway, I'm looking at Python as a rapid prototyping language.
snip
"Pythonic" is (or at least should be) a word you encounter frequently in
discussions of Python code. Learn what is considered Pythonic and the
On 7/17/2012 6:01 AM, Lipska the Kat wrote:
> Anyway, I'm looking at Python as a rapid prototyping language.
> I have an idea and just want to get it down in basic outline code as
> quickly as possible before it departs my aging brain... I'm not used to
> using variables without declaring their t
On 17/07/12 11:03, Devin Jeanpierre wrote:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 4:45 AM, Lipska the Kat wrote:
Is Python truly OO or is it just one way to use the language. I see some
documentation relating to classes but nothing on instantiation .. in fact
the documentation appears to say that classes are
On 07/17/2012 07:01 AM, Lipska the Kat wrote:
>
>
> Anyway, I'm looking at Python as a rapid prototyping language.
> I have an idea and just want to get it down in basic outline code as
> quickly as possible before it departs my aging brain... I'm not used
> to using variables without declaring th
Am 17.07.2012 11:06, schrieb andrea crotti:
import unittest
class TestWithRaises(unittest.TestCase):
def test_first(self):
assert False
def test_second(self):
print("also called")
assert True
if __name__ == '__main__':
unittest.main()
in this case als
On 17/07/12 10:30, Ulrich Eckhardt wrote:
Welcome!
Am 17.07.2012 10:45, schrieb Lipska the Kat:
I was expecting (hoping) to see in depth documentation relating to Class
construction, extension mechanisms and runtime polymorphism.
In addition to this forum for direct help and discussion, two
s
Welcome!
Am 17.07.2012 10:45, schrieb Lipska the Kat:
I was expecting (hoping) to see in depth documentation relating to Class
construction, extension mechanisms and runtime polymorphism.
In addition to this forum for direct help and discussion, two
suggestions: Firstly, it could help if you
In article ,
Duncan Booth wrote:
>Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 13 Jul 2012 12:30:47 +, Albert van der Horst wrote:
>>> The worst of is, of course, = for assignment instead of := . This is
>>> a convention that Python follows, to my dismay.
>>
>> *shrug*
>>
>> The worst is to use = for
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 4:45 AM, Lipska the Kat wrote:
> Is Python truly OO or is it just one way to use the language. I see some
> documentation relating to classes but nothing on instantiation .. in fact
> the documentation appears to say that classes are used in a static way e.g
> ClassName.met
Matej Cepl, 17.07.2012 11:39:
> On 17/07/12 10:35, gaodexiaozh...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> > I'm trying to parse an xml file with jython (not through java
>>> parsers
>>> > like xerces).
>
> https://code.google.com/p/jython-elementtree/ ???
Note that this ships with Jython 2.5.
Stefan
--
http://ma
On 17/07/12 10:35, gaodexiaozh...@gmail.com wrote:
> I'm trying to parse an xml file with jython (not through java parsers
> like xerces).
https://code.google.com/p/jython-elementtree/ ???
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
John Posner wrote:
> On 7/16/2012 12:28 PM, tinn...@isbd.co.uk wrote:
> > tinn...@isbd.co.uk wrote:
> >> I am trying to use the PyQt4 calendar widget to perform some different
> >> actions on specific dates. There are three events available:-
> >>
> >> selectionChanged()
> >> activated(QD
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 2:25 AM, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
> It already is part of the collection interface: it is spelled __nonzero__
> (Python 2) or __bool__ (Python 3), and like all dunder methods, it is
> called automatically for you when you use the right syntax:
You're still ignoring what I ac
gaodexiaozh...@gmail.com, 17.07.2012 10:35:
> hi,do you know the PyXML whether can be supported by Jython ?
PyXML is a dead project, don't use it.
You can use ElementTree in Jython, just as in Python.
Stefan
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
2012/7/16 Peter Otten <__pete...@web.de>:
> No, I don't see how the code you gave above can fail with an OSError.
>
> Can you give an example that produces the desired behaviour with nose? Maybe
> we can help you translate it to basic unittest.
>
> --
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pytho
Hi, I'm not sure if it's ok to post regarding a small local workshop
(based on Railsbridge and the Boston Python Workshop) here so please
direct me elsewhere if I am mistaken:
OpenHatch's first Chicago Python workshop is heading our way, on
August 17th - 18th. These events are tailored for women a
Pythoners
Python 2.7.3
Ubuntu Linux 12.04 LTS
I've been taking a brief look at Python.
From the tutorial documentation I get the following
'Python is an easy to learn, powerful programming language. It has
efficient high-level data structures and a simple but effective approach
to object-ori
在 2003年11月24日星期一UTC+8下午7时42分31秒,Paul Boddie写道:
> janeaustin...@hotmail.com (Jane Austine) wrote in message
> news:;...
> > I'm trying to parse an xml file with jython (not through java parsers
> > like xerces).
> >
> > I tried minidom in jython 2.1 a
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 6:23 PM, Andrew Berg wrote:
> On 7/17/2012 2:08 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>> The default behaviour is that every object is something, hence true-like,
>> unless explicitly coded to be treated as false-like. Since both loggers
>> and functions are objects, they are true-lik
On Sunday, July 15, 2012 6:20:34 PM UTC+2, rusi wrote:
> On Jul 15, 11:35 am, Dieter Maurer wrote:
> > moo...@yahoo.co.uk writes:
> > > ...
> > > Does pickle have any advantages over json/yaml?
> >
> > It can store and retrieve almost any Python object with almost no effort.
>
On 7/17/2012 2:08 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> The default behaviour is that every object is something, hence true-like,
> unless explicitly coded to be treated as false-like. Since both loggers
> and functions are objects, they are true-like unless the default is
> overridden.
I am aware of the
在 2003年1月26日星期日UTC+8下午10时01分02秒,"Martin v. Löwis"写道:
> Tim C wrote:
> > I've been trying pyxml from jython and fell into the problem when
> trying to
> > create executables that pyxml's mechanisms for importing modules
> confound
> > the compiler.
>
> What do you mean by "executable", and which
On Thursday, March 24, 2011 7:32:44 AM UTC-7, Kees Bakker wrote:
> Sad news (for me, at least), in the upcoming version 7.0 of NetBeans
> there will be no Python plugin anymore.
FWIW on the Windows platform the Zeus IDE has support for python:
http://www.zeusedit.com/python.html
Zeus is a l
On 7/15/2012 1:34 AM, Andrew Berg wrote:
This has probably been discussed before, but why is there an implicit
conversion to a boolean in if and while statements?
if not None:
print('hi')
prints 'hi' since bool(None) is False.
If this was discussed in a PEP, I would like a link to it. T
On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 00:19:48 -0500, Andrew Berg wrote:
> To put it in duck-typing terms, why should everything have to quack like
> True or False? Sure, I can see why 1 quacks like True or [] quacks like
> False, but I don't see why say, a Logger or function should quack like
> either.
The defaul
94 matches
Mail list logo