On 17/07/2012 18:49, Prasad, Ramit wrote:
import unittest
class TestWithRaises(unittest.TestCase):
def test_first(self):
assert False
def test_second(self):
print("also called")
assert True
if __name__ == '__main__':
unittest.main()
in this case also the second test is run even if the first fails..
The reason for that is that the unit testing framework catches and
handles the error. It calls both test functions in some unspecified
order and logs the result. Calls to two separate test functions are
thereby separated from each other. This is intentionally so, but I think
you can also give the unit testing framework a flag that makes it abort
after the first error. In no way will the exception escape from the
unittest.main() call though, it is all caught and handled inside, also
by intention.
But that's probably easy because we just need to catch exceptions for
every method call, so it's not exactly the same thing..
I don't understand what you want to say here. I also don't understand
what your problem in general is. I guess there are some expectations
which are not satisfied, but you haven't explained those explicitly yet.
I think Andrea wants to do the same thing but with nose and not
unittest.
Ramit
This email is confidential and subject to important disclaimers and
conditions including on offers for the purchase or sale of
securities, accuracy and completeness of information, viruses,
confidentiality, legal privilege, and legal entity disclaimers,
available at http://www.jpmorgan.com/pages/disclosures/email.
Do what? Like Ulrich Eckhart I simply don't understand what she's
getting at. Perhaps it's a problem with Englsh being a second language
issue rather than Python itself. Thankfully I'm sure that everything
will come out in the wash.
--
Cheers.
Mark Lawrence.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
