(sent from my phone)
On Apr 28, 2012 7:36 PM, "Chris Rebert" wrote:
> Correct. Pedantically, you can define __hash__() on mutable objects;
> it's just not very useful or sensible, so people generally don't.
I find it's fine to define __hash__ on mutable objects as long as __eq__
only relies on im
On 29Apr2012 02:49, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
| On Sat, 28 Apr 2012 14:55:42 -0700, Xah Lee wrote:
| > Learn Technical Writing from Unix Man in 10 Days
| >
| > Quote from man apt-get:
| >
| > remove
| > remove is identical to install except that packages are
| > removed
| > ins
On 29Apr2012 11:42, Chris Angelico wrote:
| On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 10:45 AM, kenk
wrote:
| > I've got a server process written in C++ running on Unix machine.
| > On the same box I'd like to run multiple Python scripts that will
| > communicate with this server.
| >
| > Can you please suggest w
What interfaces are available on the server process?
Sent from my iPad
On Apr 28, 2012, at 8:45 PM, kenk wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've got a server process written in C++ running on Unix machine.
> On the same box I'd like to run multiple Python scripts that will
> communicate with this server.
>
>
On Sat, 28 Apr 2012 14:55:42 -0700, Xah Lee wrote:
> Learn Technical Writing from Unix Man in 10 Days
>
> Quote from man apt-get:
>
> remove
> remove is identical to install except that packages are
> removed
> instead of installed.
Do you also expect the documentation to d
On 4/28/2012 2:09 PM, laymanzh...@gmail.com wrote:
In my understanding, there is no directly relation between mutable
and hashable in Python. Any class with __hash__ function is
"hashable".
According the wiki: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immutable_object
In object-oriented and functional prog
In article
<108cb846-6bb9-4600-a984-2fded0c91...@er9g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>,
kenk wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've got a server process written in C++ running on Unix machine.
> On the same box I'd like to run multiple Python scripts that will
> communicate with this server.
>
> Can you please sugges
On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 10:45 AM, kenk wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've got a server process written in C++ running on Unix machine.
> On the same box I'd like to run multiple Python scripts that will
> communicate with this server.
>
> Can you please suggest what would be best was to achieve this ?
Persona
Hi,
I've got a server process written in C++ running on Unix machine.
On the same box I'd like to run multiple Python scripts that will
communicate with this server.
Can you please suggest what would be best was to achieve this ?
Kind regards and thanks in advance!
M.
--
http://mail.python.org/
Le 29/04/12 00:52, Santosh Kumar a écrit :
> System Information
>
> Ubuntu 11.10
> Python 2.7.2
>
> Problem
>
>
> I think my Ubuntu has PyGTK and GTK both already installed. But
> however when I am importing "gtk" in Python interactive mode then I am
> gett
On 4/28/2012 6:45 PM, Temia Eszteri wrote:
> Professional? He's boring!
I agree. Ranting Rick is much more entertaining (usually).
--
CPython 3.2.3/3.3.0a2 | Windows NT 6.1.7601.17790
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
>On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 8:36 AM, Temia Eszteri wrote:
>> And what does this have to do with a multiplatform language like
>> Python? :P
>
>Nothing. Xah Lee is a professional troll. You can save yourself some
>trouble by ignoring his posts altogether.
>
>ChrisA
Professional? He's boring! I wanted
On 28/04/2012 23:30, Temia Eszteri wrote:
Yes, you're right. Being mutable and hashable are orthogonal properties.
The implication
mutable => non hashable
is just a design choice.
The reason for such a choice is the following. If a key-element pair K:X
is added to a container C and then K
On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 8:36 AM, Temia Eszteri wrote:
> And what does this have to do with a multiplatform language like
> Python? :P
Nothing. Xah Lee is a professional troll. You can save yourself some
trouble by ignoring his posts altogether.
ChrisA
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/
System Information
Ubuntu 11.10
Python 2.7.2
Problem
I think my Ubuntu has PyGTK and GTK both already installed. But
however when I am importing "gtk" in Python interactive mode then I am
getting the following warning:
(.:4126): Gtk-WARNING **: Unable to
And what does this have to do with a multiplatform language like
Python? :P
~Temia
--
When on earth, do as the earthlings do.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
>Yes, you're right. Being mutable and hashable are orthogonal properties.
>The implication
> mutable => non hashable
>is just a design choice.
>
>The reason for such a choice is the following. If a key-element pair K:X
>is added to a container C and then K is changed by some external Python
>
Learn Technical Writing from Unix Man in 10 Days
Quote from man apt-get:
remove
remove is identical to install except that packages are
removed
instead of installed.
Translation:
kicking
kicking is identical to kissing except that receiver is kicked
inste
On 4/28/2012 20:09, laymanzh...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm just learning Python. The python doc about mutable and hashable is
confusing to me.
In my understanding, there is no directly relation between mutable and hashable in
Python. Any class with __hash__ function is "hashable".
According the wik
Kiuhnm wrote:
I'd like to change the syntax of my module 'codeblocks' to make it more
pythonic.
Current Syntax:
with res << func(arg1) << 'x, y':
print(x, y)
with res << func(arg1) << block_name << 'x, y':
print(x, y)
New Syntax:
with res == func(arg1) .taking_bl
"From the crest of Olivet, Jesus looked upon Jerusalem. Fair and
peaceful was the scene spread out before Him. It was the season of the
Passover, and from all lands the children of Jacob had gathered there to
celebrate the great national festival. In the midst of gardens and
vineyards, and gre
Roy Smith writes:
> I agree that application-level name cacheing is "wrong", but sometimes
> doing it the wrong way just makes sense. I could whip up a simple
> cacheing wrapper around getaddrinfo() in 5 minutes. Depending on the
> environment (both technology and bureaucracy), getting a cach
Peter Faulks, 27.04.2012 22:31:
> On 27/04/2012 6:55 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>> Peter Faulks, 27.04.2012 10:36:
>>> On 27/04/2012 5:15 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
Peter Faulks, 26.04.2012 19:57:
> I want to extend an embedded interpreter so that calls to print() are
> automagically sent
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 11:09 AM, wrote:
> I'm just learning Python. The python doc about mutable and hashable is
> confusing to me.
>
> In my understanding, there is no directly relation between mutable and
> hashable in Python. Any class with __hash__ function is "hashable".
>
> According the
laymanzh...@gmail.com wrote:
> I'm just learning Python. The python doc about mutable and hashable is
> confusing to me.
>
> In my understanding, there is no directly relation between mutable and
> hashable in Python. Any class with __hash__ function is "hashable".
>
> According the wiki: http:/
I'm just learning Python. The python doc about mutable and hashable is
confusing to me.
In my understanding, there is no directly relation between mutable and hashable
in Python. Any class with __hash__ function is "hashable".
According the wiki: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immutable_object
Adam Skutt wrote:
>> You can't treat id() as an address. Did you miss my post when I
>> demonstrated that Jython returns IDs generated on demand, starting
>> from 1? In general, there is *no way even in principle* to go from
>> a Python ID to the memory location (address) of the object with
>> tha
http://python.6.n6.nabble.com/file/n4936643/op4.jpg
--
View this message in context:
http://python.6.n6.nabble.com/AMPUTEE-INCEST-MIDGET-2012-tp4708963p4936643.html
Sent from the Python - python-list mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 12:27 AM, Danyel Lawson wrote:
> I'm glad I thought of it. ;) But the trick is to use port 5353 and set
> a really short timeout on responses in the config for the DNS cache.
I don't think false timeouts are any better than true ones, if you
actually know the true ones. Bu
I'm glad I thought of it. ;) But the trick is to use port 5353 and set
a really short timeout on responses in the config for the DNS cache.
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 10:15 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 11:46 PM, Danyel Lawson
> wrote:
>> The DNS lookup is one of those things
On Apr 28, 7:26 am, Kiuhnm wrote:
> On 4/27/2012 19:15, Adam Skutt wrote:
> > On Apr 27, 11:01 am, Kiuhnm wrote:
> >> The abstraction is this:
> >> - There are primitives and objects.
> >> - Primitives are not objects. The converse is also true.
> >> - Primitives can become objects (boxing).
> >>
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 11:46 PM, Danyel Lawson wrote:
> The DNS lookup is one of those things that may make sense to run as a
> separate daemon process that listens on a socket.
Yeah, it does. One that listens on port 53, TCP and UDP, perhaps. :)
You've just recommended installing a separate ca
On 4/27/2012 11:42 PM Debashish Saha said...
44 sph_yn_P=(l*sph_yn(l,K*R)/(K*R))-sph_yn(l,K*R)
Here you're clearly multiplying by R...
---> 45 Beta_l=l-(K_P*R(sph_jv(l+1,K_P*R))/(sph_jv(l,K_P*R)))
... and here you've got R(...) which is attempting to call R() which
isn't def
Sprinkle time.sleep(0) liberally throughout your code where you think
natural processing breaks should be. Even in while loops. It's lame
but is the only way to make Python multithreading task switch fairly.
Your compute intensive tasks need a time.sleep(0) in their loops. This
prevents starvation
In article <7xy5pgqwto@ruckus.brouhaha.com>,
Paul Rubin wrote:
> John Nagle writes:
> >I may do that to prevent the stall. But the real problem was all
> > those DNS requests. Parallizing them wouldn't help much when it took
> > hours to grind through them all.
>
> True dat. But bui
On 4/27/2012 17:39, Adam Skutt wrote:
On Apr 27, 8:07 am, Kiuhnm wrote:
Useful... maybe, conceptually sound... no.
Conceptually, NaN is the class of all elements which are not numbers,
therefore NaN = NaN.
NaN isn't really the class of all elements which aren't numbers. NaN
is the result of
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 9:26 PM, Kiuhnm
wrote:
> Your problem is that you think that copy semantics requires real copying. I
> really don't see any technical difficulty in virtualizing the all thing.
"Copy semantics" without "real copying" is an optimization that a
program should never need to be
Hi,
I'am a college physics student.
If you have the following document "
SOLUTIONS MANUAL
TO FUNDAMENTALS OF ENGINEERING ELECTROMAGNETICS, by
DAVID CHENG ",
Could you please send me the document?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 4/27/2012 19:15, Adam Skutt wrote:
On Apr 27, 11:01 am, Kiuhnm wrote:
On 4/27/2012 1:57, Adam Skutt wrote:
On Apr 26, 6:34 pm, Kiuhnmwrote:
If you
understand that your 'a' is not really an object but a reference to it,
everything becomes clear and you see that '==' always do the same
On 4/27/2012 18:07, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 17:03:19 +0200, Kiuhnm wrote:
>
>> On 4/27/2012 16:09, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>>> On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 13:24:35 +0200, Kiuhnm wrote:
>>>
I'd like to change the syntax of my module 'codeblocks' to make it
more pythonic.
40 matches
Mail list logo
