On Dec 9, 2:38 am, Chris Angelico wrote:
> One piece of sophistication that I would rather like to see, but don't
> know how to do. Instead of *args,**kwargs, is it possible to somehow
> copy in the function's actual signature? I was testing this out in
> IDLE, and the fly help for the function no
In article ,
Chris Angelico wrote:
> http://thedailywtf.com/Series/Error_0x27_d.aspx
>
> This is getting quite off-topic though.
Getting off-topic, perhaps, but your comment really does bring some
closure. When I was pondering the original, "too many values to unpack"
message, I did indeed
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 1:07 PM, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
> I forget where I saw this, but somebody took a screen shot of an error
> message from a GUI application that said something like:
>
> A fatal error occurred: no error
>
> and then aborted the app.
An errant error! Sounds like the stuff that
Greetings,
Any recommendations for a book authoring system that supports the following:
1. Code examples (with syntax highlighting and line numbers)
2. Output HTML, PDF, ePub ...
3. Automatic TOC and index
4. Search (in HTML) - this is a "nice to have"
Can I somehow use Sphinx?
Thanks,
--
Miki
-
On 12/8/2011 1:54 PM, Duncan Booth wrote:
Yes, the documentation describes this although I don't think anything
highlights that it is a change from Python 2.x:
[http://docs.python.org/py3k/reference/datamodel.html]
The Python 3 docs are 're-based' on 3.0, with change notes going forward
from
On 12/09/2011 09:41 AM, Frank van den Boom wrote:
What can I do, to prevent pressing the return key?
I didn't have Windows 7 right now, but that shouldn't happen with the
code you've given; when trimming code for posting, you should check that
the trimmed code still have the exact same proble
On Thu, 08 Dec 2011 18:10:17 +, Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2011-12-08, Roy Smith wrote:
>> On Thursday, December 8, 2011 10:03:38 AM UTC-5, Jean-Michel Pichavant
>> wrote:
>>> string are iterable, considering this, the error is correct.
>>
>> Yes, I understand that the exception is correct. I
Announcing Speedometer 2.8
--
Speedometer home page:
http://excess.org/speedometer/
Download:
http://excess.org/speedometer/speedometer-2.8.tar.gz
New in this release:
- Added a linear scale option: -l. Best used in combination with
-m (and
On 12/09/2011 07:13 AM, Ethan Furman wrote:
Jean-Michel Pichavant wrote:
You have to opportunity to not use unpacking anymore :o) There is a
recent thread were the dark side of unpacking was exposed. Unpacking
is a cool feautre for very small applications but should be avoided
whenever possible
In article ,
Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2011-12-08, Roy Smith wrote:
> > On Thursday, December 8, 2011 10:03:38 AM UTC-5, Jean-Michel Pichavant
> > wrote:
> >> string are iterable, considering this, the error is correct.
> >
> > Yes, I understand that the exception is correct. I'm not saying t
Chris Angelico wrote:
One piece of sophistication that I would rather like to see, but don't
know how to do. Instead of *args,**kwargs, is it possible to somehow
copy in the function's actual signature? I was testing this out in
IDLE, and the fly help for the function no longer gave useful info
a
Chris Angelico wrote:
One piece of sophistication that I would rather like to see, but don't
know how to do. Instead of *args,**kwargs, is it possible to somehow
copy in the function's actual signature? I was testing this out in
IDLE, and the fly help for the function no longer gave useful info
a
Hello,
i have something like this under windows 7:
print("try command...")
arglist = [PATH_TO_7ZIP,"a", "-sfx", archive_name, "*", "-r",
"-p",PASSWORD]
p = subprocess.Popen(args=arglist, stdout=subprocess.PIPE,
stderr=subprocess.PIPE, cwd=srcdir)
output, error
On 8 December 2011 21:50, Ian Kelly wrote:
> You can get the same effect with a float by putting it in a container
> object and binding both variables to the same container objects rather
> than to the float directly. Then, to change the value, change the
> contents of the container object. Wha
Catherine Moroney writes:
> Is there a way to create a C-style pointer in (pure) Python so the
> following code will reflect the changes to the variable "a" in the
> dictionary "x"?
No, Python doesn't do pointers. Rather, objects have references and
that's how the program accesses the objects.
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 1:17 PM, Catherine Moroney
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is there a way to create a C-style pointer in (pure) Python so the following
> code will reflect the changes to the variable "a" in the
> dictionary "x"?
>
> For example:
>
a = 1.0
b = 2.0
x = {"a":a, "b":b}
Detlev Offenbach wrote:
I am fairly new to Mac OS X and would like to know, what I have to do to
make my Python application show the correct name in the menu bar. What
did I do so far. I created an application package containing the .plist
file with correct entries and a shell script, that star
Michael Hennebry wrote:
I've been reading about writing extension types in C and am rather
fuzzy about the relationship between tp_new, tp_alloc and tp_init.
Most especially, why tp_new? It seems to me that tp_alloc and tp_init
would be sufficient.
tp_new and tp_init correspond to the Python me
On 12/8/11 7:56 PM, Enrico wrote:
I am trying to pass a multi-dimensional ndarray to C as a multi-
dimensional C array for the purposes of passing it to mathematica.
They already have a wrapper for a 1-D Python list. where the list is
copied to "list". Shown below:
I would like to create a sim
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 7:58 AM, alister wrote:
> not as useless as "Keyboard Error press F1 to continue"
If it said "press F1 to ignore" then I would agree. This, however, is
more akin to "replace user and strike any key to continue", but more
implicit.
ChrisA
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Catherine Moroney <
catherine.m.moro...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
> Is there some way to rewrite the code above so the change of "a" from
> 1.0 to 100.0 is reflected in the dictionary. I would like to use
> simple datatypes such as floats, rather than numpy arrays or cl
On Dec 8, 2:43 pm, Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 1:16 PM, Eric wrote:
> > I'm running Python 2.7 on WinXP (ActiveState community version) and
> > when I try to do this:
>
> > if __name__ == '__main__':
> > root = Tkinter.Tk()
> > root.withdraw()
> > fileNames = tkFileDialog.a
Hello,
Is there a way to create a C-style pointer in (pure) Python so the
following code will reflect the changes to the variable "a" in the
dictionary "x"?
For example:
>>> a = 1.0
>>> b = 2.0
>>> x = {"a":a, "b":b}
>>> x
{'a': 1.0, 'b': 2.0}
>>> a = 100.0
>>> x
{'a': 1.0, 'b': 2.0} ## at
On Thu, 08 Dec 2011 18:10:17 +, Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2011-12-08, Roy Smith wrote:
>> On Thursday, December 8, 2011 10:03:38 AM UTC-5, Jean-Michel Pichavant
>> wrote:
>>> string are iterable, considering this, the error is correct.
>>
>> Yes, I understand that the exception is correct. I
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 3:16 PM, Eric wrote:
> I'm running Python 2.7 on WinXP (ActiveState community version) and
> when I try to do this:
>
> if __name__ == '__main__':
>root = Tkinter.Tk()
>root.withdraw()
>fileNames = tkFileDialog.askopenfilenames()
>root.destroy()
>print f
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 1:16 PM, Eric wrote:
> I'm running Python 2.7 on WinXP (ActiveState community version) and
> when I try to do this:
>
> if __name__ == '__main__':
> root = Tkinter.Tk()
> root.withdraw()
> fileNames = tkFileDialog.askopenfilenames()
> root.destroy()
> print fi
Benjamin Kaplan wrote:
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Ethan Furman wrote:
Benjamin Kaplan wrote:
If the RHS was a tuple or a list, yes you could know immediately. But
unpacking works with any iterable, so it probably doesn't special-case
lists and tuples. Iterables don't have a size- they jus
MRAB writes:
> GvR isn't our leader, we are his followers. There's a difference. :-)
+1 QotW
--
\ “Guaranteed to work throughout its useful life.” —packaging for |
`\ clockwork toy, Hong Kong |
_o__)
I'm running Python 2.7 on WinXP (ActiveState community version) and
when I try to do this:
if __name__ == '__main__':
root = Tkinter.Tk()
root.withdraw()
fileNames = tkFileDialog.askopenfilenames()
root.destroy()
print fileNames
# windows filename gets
for fileName in fileNames
Jean-Michel Pichavant wrote:
You have to opportunity to not use unpacking anymore :o) There is a
recent thread were the dark side of unpacking was exposed. Unpacking is
a cool feautre for very small applications but should be avoided
whenever possible otherwise.
Which thread was that?
~Etha
I am trying to pass a multi-dimensional ndarray to C as a multi-
dimensional C array for the purposes of passing it to mathematica.
They already have a wrapper for a 1-D Python list. where the list is
copied to "list". Shown below:
static PyObject * mathlink_PutIntegerList(mathlink_Link *self,
PyO
On 12/8/11 4:21 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 2:55 AM, Andrea Crotti wrote:
Yes but how do you know how many values you generated when it quits?
I mean I don't know how it work internally, but it should keep a temporary
list of the yielded values to be able to find out how ma
WHAT IS IT:
The Sybase module provides a Python interface to the Sybase relational
database system. It supports all of the Python Database API, version
2.0 with extensions. Please downolad, test and report any problems with
the pre-release.
** This version is a pre-release not intended for p
Roy Smith wrote:
On Thursday, December 8, 2011 10:03:38 AM UTC-5, Jean-Michel Pichavant wrote:
string are iterable, considering this, the error is correct.
Yes, I understand that the exception is correct. I'm not saying the exception
should be changed, just that we have the opportuni
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Ethan Furman wrote:
> Benjamin Kaplan wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 1:42 PM, Roy Smith wrote:
>>>
>>> (some,
>>> very,
>>> long,
>>> list,
>>> of,
>>> variable,
>>> names,
>>> to,
>>> get,
>>> the,
>>> stuff,
>>> unpacked,
>>> into) = function_tha
Benjamin Kaplan wrote:
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 1:42 PM, Roy Smith wrote:
(some,
very,
long,
list,
of,
variable,
names,
to,
get,
the,
stuff,
unpacked,
into) = function_that_should_return_a_14_tuple()
raises
ValueError: too many values to unpack
Quick, what's the bug? Did I forget
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 1:42 PM, Roy Smith wrote:
> (some,
> very,
> long,
> list,
> of,
> variable,
> names,
> to,
> get,
> the,
> stuff,
> unpacked,
> into) = function_that_should_return_a_14_tuple()
>
> raises
>
> ValueError: too many values to unpack
>
> Quick, what's the bug? Did
Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 4:32 AM, Peter Otten <__pete...@web.de> wrote:
>> The only thing that has changed (in 2.7) is the algorithm to
>> calculate the hash value. The bits are rotated to turn the four least
>> significant bits into the most signicant ones. According to a c
Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 4:32 AM, Peter Otten <__pete...@web.de> wrote:
>> The only thing that has changed (in 2.7) is the algorithm to calculate
>> the hash value. The bits are rotated to turn the four least significant
>> bits into the most signicant ones. According to a co
(some,
very,
long,
list,
of,
variable,
names,
to,
get,
the,
stuff,
unpacked,
into) = function_that_should_return_a_14_tuple()
raises
ValueError: too many values to unpack
Quick, what's the bug? Did I forget a variable on the LHS, or is my function
returning more things than it shou
On 2011-12-08, Roy Smith wrote:
> On Thursday, December 8, 2011 10:03:38 AM UTC-5, Jean-Michel Pichavant wrote:
>> string are iterable, considering this, the error is correct.
>
> Yes, I understand that the exception is correct. I'm not saying the
> exception should be changed, just that we have
On 08/12/2011 04:10, Rick Johnson wrote:
[snip]
I believe this community has a cancer. A cancer that is rotting us
from the inside. A cancer that has metastasis and is spreading like
wild fire.
The problem with a cancer is not that it rots, but that it
grows uncontrollably.
*Inquisitive Joe a
On 12/08/11 09:30, Roy Smith wrote:
On Thursday, December 8, 2011 9:47:02 AM UTC-5, Robert Kern
wrote:
Would including the respective numbers help your thought
processes?
ValueError: too many values to unpack (expected 2, got 3)
I don't know if that would have done the trick for me on this
p
> One piece of sophistication that I would rather like to see, but don't
> know how to do. Instead of *args,**kwargs, is it possible to somehow
> copy in the function's actual signature? I was testing this out in
> IDLE, and the fly help for the function no longer gave useful info
> about its argum
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 4:32 AM, Peter Otten <__pete...@web.de> wrote:
> The only thing that has changed (in 2.7) is the algorithm to calculate the
> hash value. The bits are rotated to turn the four least significant bits
> into the most signicant ones. According to a comment in Objects/objects.c
>
Chris Angelico wrote:
> It checks for equality using hashes. By default, in Python 2, objects'
> hashes are their ids - meaning that no two of them hash alike, and
> you'll get duplicates in your set. (In Python 3, the default appears
> to be that they're unhashable and hence can't go into the set
Decorators are great for adding common functionality to several
functions without duplicating code. For example, I have one for my IRC
bot that checks that the person sending the command is authorized to use
the command. It's only "if mask in owner list then execute function else
say access denied"
On 12/8/2011 10:38 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> One piece of sophistication that I would rather like to see, but don't
> know how to do. Instead of *args,**kwargs, is it possible to somehow
> copy in the function's actual signature?
I remember seeing this in a PEP that is planned to be implemented i
Andrea Crotti wrote:
> I've wasted way too much time for this, which is surely not a Python bug,
> not something that surprised me a lot.
>
> I stupidly gave for granted that adding an object to a set would first
> check if there are equal elements inside, and then add it.
>
> As shown below thi
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 3:34 AM, Andrea Crotti wrote:
> I've wasted way too much time for this, which is surely not a Python bug,
> not something that surprised me a lot.
>
> I stupidly gave for granted that adding an object to a set would first
> check if there are equal elements inside, and then
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 3:24 AM, K.-Michael Aye wrote:
> I understand this one, it seems really useful. And maybe i start to sense
> some more applicability. Like this, with extra flags that could be set at
> run time, I could influence the way a function is executed without designing
> the functio
I've wasted way too much time for this, which is surely not a Python bug,
not something that surprised me a lot.
I stupidly gave for granted that adding an object to a set would first
check if there are equal elements inside, and then add it.
As shown below this is not clearly the case..
Is it p
On 2011-12-08 11:43:12 +, Chris Angelico said:
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 10:22 PM, K.-Michael Aye wrote:
I am still perplexed about decorators though, am happily using Python for
many years without them, but maybe i am missing something?
For example in the above case, if I want the names atta
On 12/01/2011 08:03 AM, Andrew Berg wrote:
I've done some research, but I'm not sure what's most appropriate for my
situation. What I want to do is have a long running process that spawns
processes (that aren't necessarily written in Python) and communicates
with them. The children can be spawned
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 2:55 AM, Andrea Crotti wrote:
> Yes but how do you know how many values you generated when it quits?
> I mean I don't know how it work internally, but it should keep a temporary
> list of the yielded values to be able to find out how many values are
> there..
Iterator unpac
On 12/08/2011 03:42 PM, Roy Smith wrote:
Why not? Take this example:
def i():
i = 0
while True:
print "returning:", i
yield i
i += 1
a, b = i()
./iter.py
returning: 0
returning: 1
returning: 2
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "./iter.py", line 1
Am 08.12.2011 16:42, schrieb Roy Smith:
The exception was raised when i() returned it's third value, so saying "expected 2,
got 3" is exactly correct. Yes, it is true that it might have gotten more if it
kept going, but that's immaterial; the fact that it got to 3 is what caused the Holy Hand
On Thursday, December 8, 2011 10:16:56 AM UTC-5, Heiko Wundram wrote:
> Am 08.12.2011 15:47, schrieb Robert Kern:
> > Would including the respective numbers help your thought processes?
> > ValueError: too many values to unpack (expected 2, got 3)
>
> Not possible in the general case (as the right
On Thursday, December 8, 2011 10:03:38 AM UTC-5, Jean-Michel Pichavant wrote:
> string are iterable, considering this, the error is correct.
Yes, I understand that the exception is correct. I'm not saying the exception
should be changed, just that we have the opportunity to produce a more useful
On Thursday, December 8, 2011 9:47:02 AM UTC-5, Robert Kern wrote:
> Would including the respective numbers help your thought processes?
>
> ValueError: too many values to unpack (expected 2, got 3)
I don't know if that would have done the trick for me on this particular one.
On the other hand
Am 08.12.2011 15:47, schrieb Robert Kern:
Would including the respective numbers help your thought processes?
ValueError: too many values to unpack (expected 2, got 3)
Not possible in the general case (as the right-hand side might be an
arbitrary iterable/iterator...).
--
--- Heiko.
--
http:
On 12/08/2011 02:09 PM, sajuptpm wrote:
Hi,
I am trying source code documentation using Sphinx. Here i have to
copy paste all modules in to *.rst file, that is painful. Have any way
to create documentation (doc for all modules, classes and methods in
the project directory) from project folder qui
Roy Smith wrote:
I just spent a while beating my head against this one.
# Python 2.6
a, b = 'foo'
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "", line 1, in
ValueError: too many values to unpack
The real problem is that there's too *few* values to unpack! It should
have been
a,
On 12/8/11 2:23 PM, Roy Smith wrote:
I just spent a while beating my head against this one.
# Python 2.6
a, b = 'foo'
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "", line 1, in
ValueError: too many values to unpack
The real problem is that there's too *few* values to unpack! It should
have be
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 1:23 AM, Roy Smith wrote:
> I just spent a while beating my head against this one.
>
> # Python 2.6
a, b = 'foo'
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "", line 1, in
> ValueError: too many values to unpack
Definitely weird! I smell a job for a linter though. If
On 12/08/2011 02:23 PM, Roy Smith wrote:
I just spent a while beating my head against this one.
# Python 2.6
a, b = 'foo'
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "", line 1, in
ValueError: too many values to unpack
The real problem is that there's too *few* values to unpack! It should
hav
I just spent a while beating my head against this one.
# Python 2.6
>>> a, b = 'foo'
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "", line 1, in
ValueError: too many values to unpack
The real problem is that there's too *few* values to unpack! It should
have been
a, b = 'foo', 'bar'
I understan
Hi,
I am trying source code documentation using Sphinx. Here i have to
copy paste all modules in to *.rst file, that is painful. Have any way
to create documentation (doc for all modules, classes and methods in
the project directory) from project folder quickly. I also plannig to
add a code browsin
Thanks both,
Putting the variable inside a module works well.
As the content is an object created inside another module I'm using this
trick :
module.CONFIG = module.load()
So the variable is handled by the module that creates/use it, easy to
use and pretty "native" to understand.
Le 08
On 12/08/2011 06:28 AM, Bastien Semene wrote:
Hi list,
I'm trying to pass a variable to an imported module without singletons.
I've seen in the doc, and tested that I can't use global to do it :
=== module.py ===
def testf():
print test
=== main.py ===
global test
test = 1
imported_module =
On 8 December 2011 11:28, Bastien Semene wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I'm trying to pass a variable to an imported module without singletons.
> I've seen in the doc, and tested that I can't use global to do it :
>
> === module.py ===
> def testf():
> print test
>
>
> === main.py ===
> global test
> test
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 10:22 PM, K.-Michael Aye wrote:
> I am still perplexed about decorators though, am happily using Python for
> many years without them, but maybe i am missing something?
> For example in the above case, if I want the names attached to each other
> with a comma, why wouldn't I
Hi list,
I'm trying to pass a variable to an imported module without singletons.
I've seen in the doc, and tested that I can't use global to do it :
=== module.py ===
def testf():
print test
=== main.py ===
global test
test = 1
imported_module = __import__(module, globals(), locals(), [], -1
Guido is too busy secretly pouring his cruelty and malice into a master
ring to answer trolls. Help yourself to a lesser ring on your way out.
On Dec 8, 2011 10:14 PM, "Andrea Crotti" wrote:
> On 12/08/2011 04:10 AM, Rick Johnson wrote:
>
>> ...
>>
>> Why has GvR not admonished the atrocious beha
On 2011-12-08 08:59:26 +, Thomas Rachel said:
Am 08.12.2011 08:18 schrieb 8 Dihedral:
I use the @ decorator to behave exactly like a c macro that
does have fewer side effects.
I am wondering is there other interesting methods to do the
jobs in Python?
In combination with a generator,
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 10:10 PM, Andrea Crotti
wrote:
> Supposing even that Guido resigns, why do you think that the power should go
> to you?
> Power is not something that you can claim for, you have to earn the right,
> and
> ranting doesn't normally buy anything ;)
Power is something you creat
On 12/08/2011 04:10 AM, Rick Johnson wrote:
...
Why has GvR not admonished the atrocious behavior of some people in
this community? Why has GvR not admitted publicly the hideous state of
IDLE and Tkinter? Where is the rally call? Where is the community
spirit? The future of Pythin is in your han
On Thursday, December 8, 2011 8:59:31 AM UTC+1, Hegedüs, Ervin wrote:
> > The timestamp is applied to the pdf in detached mode (i.e. as a separate
> > .tsr file)
>
> I'm afraid that's not good for us - we need to propagate PDF
> files in enbedded mode.
I'll do some research and let you know if i
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 1:34 AM, HansPeter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While using the feedparser library for downloading RSS feeds some of
> the blog entries seem to have no title.
>
> File "build\bdist.win32\egg\feedparser.py", line 382, in __getattr__
> AttributeError: object has no attribute 'title'
>
>
What is mrjob?
---
mrjob is a Python package that helps you write and run Hadoop Streaming
jobs.
mrjob fully supports Amazon's Elastic MapReduce (EMR) service, which allows
you to buy time on a Hadoop cluster on an hourly basis. It also works with
your own Hadoop cluster.
Some
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 7:59 PM, Thomas Rachel
wrote:
> Many other things are thinkable...
And many more are unthinkable. Can we start an International
Obfuscated Python Code Contest? It's the only place such...
abhorrences can properly flourish.
ChrisA
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo
Hi,
While using the feedparser library for downloading RSS feeds some of
the blog entries seem to have no title.
File "build\bdist.win32\egg\feedparser.py", line 382, in __getattr__
AttributeError: object has no attribute 'title'
Is there a way to test the existence of an attribute?
I can use
Tim Chase writes:
> From an interface perspective, I suppose it would work. However one
> of the main computer-science reasons for addressing by a hash is to
> get O(1) access to items (modulo pessimal hash structures/algorithms
> which can approach O(N) if everything hashes to the same
> value/
Am 08.12.2011 08:18 schrieb 8 Dihedral:
I use the @ decorator to behave exactly like a c macro that
does have fewer side effects.
I am wondering is there other interesting methods to do the
jobs in Python?
In combination with a generator, you can do many funny things.
For example, you ca
Terry Reedy writes:
> On 12/7/2011 7:03 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> > On Wed, 07 Dec 2011 09:09:16 -0800, Massi wrote:
> >
> >> Is there a way to create three variables dynamically inside Sum
> >> in order to re write the function like this?
>
> I should have mentioned in my earlier response tha
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 11:18 PM, 8 Dihedral
wrote:
> I use the @ decorator to behave exactly like a c macro that
> does have fewer side effects.
>
> I am wondering is there other interesting methods to do the
> jobs in Python?
* Class decorators (http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-3129/ ); i.
hello,
On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 11:39:20PM -0800, marco.ru...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi, take a look at this online tool: http://easytimestamping.com
I need to create the PDF on my server - it could be any online
service, but it must to have any kind of API.
> It is able to apply RFC3161 compliant t
87 matches
Mail list logo
