Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
> Ah, but you said "standard" module for Python... The
> graphics/sound extensions on your TI 99/4A were not "standard" BASIC...
I assume by "standard" you mean some sort of formal standard,
like ANSI Basic or ISO C? If so, well, there's no "standard" Python.
What
Thanks, but the problem is that I need to create the entire Excel
document from scratch, dynamically, via the Python script. I want the
script to add the macro code.
-Chris
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Sat, 2004-12-18 at 00:40, Amir Dekel wrote:
> This must be the silliest question ever:
>
> What about user input in Python? (like stdin)
> Where can I find it? I can't find any references to it in the documentation.
Under UNIX, I generally either use curses, or just put the terminal into
raw m
chris wrote:
I'm creating an excel document dynamically from scratch using Python
and the win32com module. All is well, but now I need to add a macro to
the spreadsheet and run it (to enable some sorting features in the
spreadsheet). I think I know how to run a macro once it's installed
(using th
Jim Hill wrote:
Is there a way to produce a very long multiline string of output with
variables' values inserted without having to resort to this wacky
"""v = %s"""%(variable)
business?
Try combining Python 2.4's subprocess module with its string Templates.
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | [EMAI
Steven Bethard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> map = {}
> for key, value in sequence:
> map.setdefault(key, []).append(value)
I was thinking about exactly that the other day, when converting some
perl to python.
[ digression: In perl, you do
push @{$map->{$key}}, $value
If $map->{$key} d
On Fri, 2004-12-17 at 09:40, Alessandro Crugnola wrote:
> Hi all,
> i need to use a regular expression to match javadoc style comments in a file,
> something like
>
> /**
>* Constructs a new Call instance.
>*
>* @param object the object the Function shall be executed
JanC <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Tim Roberts schreef:
>
>> I don't think that's fair. Visual C++ 7.1 is signficantly better at
>> compliance than their past compilers.
>
>AFAIK that's only for C++, not for C...?
Yes. Microsoft has largely chosen to ignore C99. According to the Visual
Studio te
Dave wrote:
Hi, all,
I'm trying to implement a simple plugin framework, with some
unexpected results. I'm using Python 2.3.4 on Windows 2000.
My script loader.py loads plugin packages from a directory (in this
case its own), and checks a variable defined in the package's
__init__.py for information
Dave wrote:
Hi, all,
I'm trying to implement a simple plugin framework, with some
unexpected results. I'm using Python 2.3.4 on Windows 2000.
What would be the difference between a "plugin" and a regular Python module?
-- ~
Kei
Peter Hansen wrote:
Jim Hill wrote:
I've done some Googling around on this and it seems like creating a here
document is a bit tricky with Python. Trivial via triple-quoted strings
if there's no need for variable interpolation but requiring a long, long
formatted arglist via (%s,%s,%s,ad infinitum
I was curious so I googled , looks like a unix thing :)
http://www.faqs.org/docs/abs/HTML/here-docs.html
Ok I am with Peter on this , still clueless.
What about string replacement.
py> x = """ Hello me name is ~NAME~. \n I am ~AGE~ years old.\n
...I live in ~CITY~.\n The city of ~CITY~ i
Hello,
I posted a while back about a newbie database question and got a
lot of great help here. My script that I am creating has come a long way
(For me!) and almost does what I need it too. I am basicly using a
dictionary to update a access database using an odbc connector. I am ab
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear all,
i have a simple question.
Suppose I have my classes such as
myClass1.py
myClass2.py
etc
which I keep in a special folder ~/py_libs
Now
suppose I have a program that is not in py_libs
but I want to do
import myClass1 # note: myClass1 is not in the current directory
Jim Hill wrote:
I've done some Googling around on this and it seems like creating a here
document is a bit tricky with Python. Trivial via triple-quoted strings
if there's no need for variable interpolation but requiring a long, long
formatted arglist via (%s,%s,%s,ad infinitum) if there is. So m
Bengt Richter wrote:
> m=type('',(),{})()
Nick Coghlan wrote:
> Heh.
>
> Look ma, Perlython!
I doubt anyone could perform such a ghastly hack so simply and
straightforwardly in Perl.
--
CARL BANKS
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
To the best of my knowledge, the only way to do this is as you describe: delete
the old item, then insert the new item. The Tk manpage for "listbox" doesn't
describe any commands to only update an item in the list.
Actually, you may have another choice, if your Tk is new enough---Tk supports
(in
On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 20:41:11 -0600, Mike Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Scott Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Forth seems better than basic, but is *weird* (I tried it for a
>> while). I'm not sure going from Forth to C (or Python) would be much
>> easier than Basic to C or Python.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alex Martelli) writes:
> gmpy wraps GMP, which is covered by LGPL; therefore, gmpy itself is
> LGPL, and thus, sadly, cannot be included with python (otherwise,
> speaking as gmpy's author, I'd be glad to fix its design to meet your
> objections).
There's no obstacle to includin
Raymond L. Buvel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mike Meyer wrote:
> > PEP: XXX
> > Title: A rational number module for Python
>
>
> I think it is a good idea to have rationals as part of the standard
> distribution but why not base this on the gmpy module
> (https://sourceforge.net/projects/gmpy
On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 20:41:11 -0600, Mike Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Scott Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Forth seems better than basic, but is *weird* (I tried it for a
>> while). I'm not sure going from Forth to C (or Python) would be much
>> easier than Basic to C or Python.
Noam Raphael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What I want is that if I have this module:
>
> ==
>
> class BaseClass(object):
> def __init__(self):
> ...
>
> @notimplemented
> def save_data(self, filename):
> """This method should save the interna
"chris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I'm creating an excel document dynamically from scratch using Python
>and the win32com module. All is well, but now I need to add a macro to
>the spreadsheet and run it (to enable some sorting features in the
>spreadsheet). I think I know how to run a macro on
Dear all,
i have a simple question.
Suppose I have my classes such as
myClass1.py
myClass2.py
etc
which I keep in a special folder ~/py_libs
Now
suppose I have a program that is not in py_libs
but I want to do
import myClass1 # note: myClass1 is not in the current directory
how can I set the sear
I've done some Googling around on this and it seems like creating a here
document is a bit tricky with Python. Trivial via triple-quoted strings
if there's no need for variable interpolation but requiring a long, long
formatted arglist via (%s,%s,%s,ad infinitum) if there is. So my
question is:
I'm creating an excel document dynamically from scratch using Python
and the win32com module. All is well, but now I need to add a macro to
the spreadsheet and run it (to enable some sorting features in the
spreadsheet). I think I know how to run a macro once it's installed
(using the Run method
Hi, all,
I'm trying to implement a simple plugin framework, with some
unexpected results. I'm using Python 2.3.4 on Windows 2000.
My script loader.py loads plugin packages from a directory (in this
case its own), and checks a variable defined in the package's
__init__.py for information on the pl
Noam Raphael wrote:
Well, what do you say?
Raising NotImplementedError in the methods that need to be overridden is
much more customary, more straightforward, and already works fine.
--
Erik Max Francis && [EMAIL PROTECTED] && http://www.alcyone.com/max/
San Jose, CA, USA && 37 20 N 121 53 W && A
On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 01:49:50 +0200, Noam Raphael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hello,
>
> I thought about a new Python feature. Please tell me what you think
> about it.
>
> Say you want to write a base class with some unimplemented methods, that
> subclasses must implement (or maybe even just de
Hello,
Is there a quick way to replace the content of a single item in
tkinter's listbox? Currently my solution is to first delete the item,
then insert a new item at the same position. I think there may be
better way.
Zhang Le
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Hello,
I thought about a new Python feature. Please tell me what you think
about it.
Say you want to write a base class with some unimplemented methods, that
subclasses must implement (or maybe even just declare an interface, with
no methods implemented). Right now, you don't really have a way
Amir Dekel wrote:
Mike Meyer wrote:
Doing a second import will find the module in sys.modules and not
bother looking in the file system. The solution is to reload(module)
instead of import module.
What if I import using "from module import class"? It seems to me that I
can't use reload the
Mike Meyer wrote:
max() and min() are already part of the standard library.
Providing them as instance methods is quite irregular.
They don't handle decimals or rationals. This is following the lead of
the decimal package.
As Tim pointed out - decimal has its own versions of max & min which conform
Amir Dekel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Mike Meyer wrote:
>> Doing a second import will find the module in sys.modules and not
>> bother looking in the file system. The solution is to reload(module)
>> instead of import module.
>> What if I import using "from module import class"? It see
Dennis Lee Bieber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I like your categories, but you forgot one.
> On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 13:54:45 -0500, Adam DePrince <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> declaimed the following in comp.lang.python:
>> I'd like to ask everybody a simple question. How many computer
>> languages are you
Mike Meyer wrote:
Doing a second import will find the module in sys.modules and not
bother looking in the file system. The solution is to reload(module)
instead of import module.
What if I import using "from module import class"? It seems to me that I
can't use reload then, or I just could
Bengt Richter wrote:
It is a little sneaky though, so it might not be prudent to promote
without a little more experimentation? I just like to explore ;-)
I don't think even the py-dev discussions of this settled on whether such tricks
were "very cool" or "downright evil".
They're probably less e
[Format recovered from top posting.]
"James Martin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
> "Amir Dekel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Hello everyone,
>> First, I have to say that Python is one of the coolest programing
>> languages I have seen.
>> And now for the prob
Robert Brewer wrote:
Bengt Richter wrote:
>>> m=type('',(),{})()
>>> m.title = 'not so fast ;-)'
>>> m.title
'not so fast ;-)'
Now THAT is a cool object trick. :)
Heh.
Look ma, Perlython!
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Brisbane, Australia
--
Terry Reedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Alex Martelli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > for item in alist:
> >if isnasty(item):
> >alist.remove(item)
> >
> > changing the header to ``in alist[:]:'' or ``in list(alist):'' probably
> > makes this code
"Alex Martelli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> for item in alist:
>if isnasty(item):
>alist.remove(item)
>
> changing the header to ``in alist[:]:'' or ``in list(alist):'' probably
> makes this code work, but it still can't make it GOOD... good would be:
On Sat, 18 Dec 2004 14:39:54 -0500, "Terry Reedy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>"Bengt Richter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> On Sat, 18 Dec 2004 03:05:08 -0500, "Terry Reedy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>>To avoid the redundancy of 'a' and '_a', etc, how abo
In respect to map(func, seq) versus [func(i) for i in seq], for
pre-existing func, 'OP' wrote
The map form, in this case, parses instantly in my brain, while the
listcomp
certainly takes a few cycles. And note that I'm not talking about the
typing
conciseness, but about the
Try deleting the Compiled Python File that was created during import --
extension pyc. Then import again.
It seems to me (I'm a novice too) that, when you import a module, Python
automatically compiles it. Then when you import it later, the compiled
version is imported if it exists.
"Amir Dek
Jason Zheng wrote:
I'm wondering why python still has limited lambda support. What's
stopping the developers of python to support more lisp-like lambda
function?
See boo and its support for closures: http://boo.codehaus.org/
http://boo.codehaus.org/Closures
It works with "def" or "do", or single-
Just installed Python 2.4 (from Python.org) and the Win32 extesions (from
Mark's site) and am now having NO problems. I'll report more info as I
experience it.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
"Christopher J. Bottaro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes on Fri, 10 Dec 2004
11:45:19 -0600:
> ...
> Hmm, thanks for the suggestions. One more quick question. Is it even
> possible to set a breakpoint in a class method in pdb.py? I can't even say
> "break Class.f" without the condition. I don't thi
I am having a lot of problems with this distribution. Is anyone else?
Among many, many problems in the debugger I also see the error below when I
start PythonWin using the context menu when selecting a python file in the
windows shell explorer. Anyone having this problem? I done a complete
unins
"Bengt Richter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Sat, 18 Dec 2004 03:05:08 -0500, "Terry Reedy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>>To avoid the redundancy of 'a' and '_a', etc, how about (untested):
>>
>>def dispvia(f):
>> dispatch[f.__name__.split('_')[1]] = f
>> r
"Mike Meyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> Title: A rational number module for Python
>>
1. I would call this Not Necessary but Nice. Perhaps the time has come to
include rationals in the Standard Library, given that its expansion will be
a focus of the 2.5
Jp Calderone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> They do handle decimals. They handle any object which define __cmp__,
> or the appropriate rich comparison methods.
That settles that. They're gone from the proposal. So is the method
inverse, as that's simply 1/rational.
[Jp Calderone]
...
> The Decimal type seems to define min and max so that NaNs
> can be treated specially, but I glean this understanding from only
> a moment of reading decimal.py. Perhaps someone more well
> informed can declare definitively the purpose of these methods.
To conform to the sema
On Sat, 18 Dec 2004 12:40:04 -0600, Mike Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>"John Roth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > "Mike Meyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> PEP: XXX
> >> Title: A rational number module for Python
> >> The ``Rational`` class shall defi
On Sat, 18 Dec 2004 12:29:10 -0600, Mike Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>"Raymond L. Buvel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Mike Meyer wrote:
> >> PEP: XXX
> >> Title: A rational number module for Python
> >
> >
> > I think it is a good idea to have rationals as part of the standard
> > distr
There's something quite simple I'd like to do, but I'm hampered by
lack of knowledge regarding Tkinter. If someone could help me out with
a snippet of maximally-simple code showing, in general terms, how to
do this, that would be really great. What I want to do is simply to
move a shape around on t
"John Roth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Mike Meyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> PEP: XXX
>> Title: A rational number module for Python
>> The ``Rational`` class shall define all the standard mathematical
>> operations: addition, subtraction, multiplication,
"Raymond L. Buvel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Mike Meyer wrote:
>> PEP: XXX
>> Title: A rational number module for Python
>
>
> I think it is a good idea to have rationals as part of the standard
> distribution but why not base this on the gmpy module
> (https://sourceforge.net/projects/gmpy)?
Does this one count?
http://hacks.oreilly.com/pub/h/2630
"Jan Dries" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Michael Hoffman wrote:
> > Gregor Horvath wrote:
> >
> > > Or make any given standard python object accessible from MS Excel in
2
> > > minutes.
> >
> > from win32
"Mike Meyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PEP: XXX
Title: A rational number module for Python
Version: $Revision: 1.4 $
Last-Modified: $Date: 2003/09/22 04:51:50 $
Author: Mike Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Status: Draft
Type: Staqndards
Content-Type: text/x-rst
Created:
Bengt Richter wrote:
> >>> m=type('',(),{})()
> >>> m.title = 'not so fast ;-)'
> >>> m.title
> 'not so fast ;-)'
Now THAT is a cool object trick. :)
FuManChu
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
"Byron Saltysiak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi, I'm new to Python and looking to run a large project that would
need automated builds and project reports such as unit test coverage.
Maven is a great Java software to do this - but is there something I
should use fo
"Jan Dries" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Michael Hoffman wrote:
> > Gregor Horvath wrote:
> >
> > > Or make any given standard python object accessible from MS Excel in
2
> > > minutes.
> >
> > from win32com.client import Dispatch
> >
> > xlApp = Dispatch("Excel.
Adam DePrince <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Each iteration of os.walk returns three parameters; one of those, dirs,
> is a list of directories within the current directory pointed at by
> root.
Yes, it does.
> Am I correct to assume that you beleve that by changing the contents of
> dir you will
Mike Meyer wrote:
PEP: XXX
Title: A rational number module for Python
I think it is a good idea to have rationals as part of the standard
distribution but why not base this on the gmpy module
(https://sourceforge.net/projects/gmpy)? That module already provides
good performance. However, it d
Terry Reedy wrote:
"Jp Calderone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 18:16:08 -0500, Terry Reedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
.
For one-off uses not eligible for lambda treatment, where you really do not
care about the name, use the same name, such
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
Hi Michael
eh?
where can I get the DNS packag for Python - I haven't been able
to find it so far.
googling for "python dns" brings up links to:
http://www.digitallumber.com/oak (server)
http://sourceforge.net/projects/pydns/ (client library)
among the first few hits
> Hi Michael
eh?
> where can I get the DNS packag for Python - I haven't been able
> to find it so far.
googling for "python dns" brings up links to:
http://www.digitallumber.com/oak (server)
http://sourceforge.net/projects/pydns/ (client library)
among the first few hits -- but those
Hi, I'm new to Python and looking to run a large project that would
need automated builds and project reports such as unit test coverage.
Maven is a great Java software to do this - but is there something I
should use for Python? I did some searching on SF and this list but
can't figure out what t
Hi
Michael
where can I get the
DNS packag for Python - I haven't been able to find it so
far.
Thanks a lot and
best regards.
Herbert
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Michael Hoffman wrote:
Gregor Horvath wrote:
> Or make any given standard python object accessible from MS Excel in 2
> minutes.
from win32com.client import Dispatch
xlApp = Dispatch("Excel.Application")
xlApp.Visible = 1
xlApp.Workbooks.Add()
xlApp.ActiveSheet.Cells(1,1).Value = 'Python Rules!'
Nick Coghlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[quoting from the Reference Manual]
> If a class defines mutable objects and implements a __cmp__()
> or __eq__() method, it should not implement __hash__(), since the dictionary
> implementation requires that a key's hash value is immutable (if the object'
Gregor Horvath wrote:
> Or make any given standard python object accessible from MS Excel in 2
> minutes.
from win32com.client import Dispatch
xlApp = Dispatch("Excel.Application")
xlApp.Visible = 1
xlApp.Workbooks.Add()
xlApp.ActiveSheet.Cells(1,1).Value = 'Python Rules!'
xlApp.ActiveWorkbook.Acti
On Sat, 18 Dec 2004 08:41:46 +0100, Gregor Horvath
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That means that you can set a breakpoint. While the debugger stops you
> can edit the sourcecode (to some extent) without stopping program
> execution and let the interpreter run this new code without restarting
> t
It's me wrote:
I am trying out PyCrust and at a lost what to do next. With the previous
IDE I tried, the IDE pops up the console and the editor. From the editor, I
can set up breakpoints and debug and so forth. Yes, I can even run the
script.
With PyCrust, the nice looking 3-pane window pops up
Steven Bethard wrote:
first, iterable = peek(iterable)
I really like this as a general solution to a problem that bothers me
occasionally. IMHO it's much better than having UndoFiles or similar
things lying about for every use case.
Thanks!
--
Michael Hoffman
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/li
Charlie Taylor wrote:
flow = integrate(lambda x: 2.0*pi * d(x)* v(x) * sin(a(x)),xBeg, xEnd)
def _flow_func(x):
return 2.0 * pi * d(x) * v(x) * sin(a(x))
flow = integrate(_flow_func, xBeg, xEnd)
root = findRoot(xBeg, xEnd,
lambda x: y2+ lp*(x-x2) -wallFunc( x )[0], tolerance=1.0E-15)
d
OK thanks for the idea. I have tried this with rather strange restults.
First, in order to be sure I knew what was going on, I wrote a script,
SpawnvTestTarget0.py, which didn't do much apart from write to a file.
I then wrote another script which spawnv'd SpawnvTestTarget0.py from
within the CGI
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
Steven Bethard wrote:
The map form, in this case, parses instantly in my brain, while the listcomp
certainly takes a few cycles. And note that I'm not talking about the typing
conciseness, but about the effort for my brain. But maybe I'm just wired
funny :)
Well, different at
Nick Coghlan wrote:
Nick Coghlan wrote:
Chris Lasher wrote:
Hello,
I really like the finditer() method of the re module. I'm having
difficulty at the moment, however, because finditer() still creates a
callable-iterator oject, even when no match is found. This is
undesirable in cases where I would
"vincent delft" wrote:
> I've a module written in C and the associated setup.py.
> Work fine (and compile fine with mvc) with Python 2.3.x
>
> Now I've installed Python 2.4 (all the rest unchanged)
> When I try to compile it, I've got a message saying that .NET SDK must be
> installed.
the m
I've a module written in C and the associated setup.py.
Work fine (and compile fine with mvc) with Python 2.3.x
Now I've installed Python 2.4 (all the rest unchanged)
When I try to compile it, I've got a message saying that .NET SDK must be
installed.
Am I the only one having this problem (n
On Sat, 18 Dec 2004 03:05:08 -0500, "Terry Reedy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>"Bengt Richter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Looks like your standard pattern could be updated:
>>
>> >>> dispatch = {}
>> >>>
>> >>> def dispvia(name):
>> ... def _(f, name=name
On 2004-12-18, Terry Reedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> "Dima Dorfman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Both languages compile all three functions (f and the two versions of
>> g) once and choose which g to return at run-time.
>
> *If* OCaml or any other 'other' l
"Nick Coghlan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Although, it looks like new-style classes currently don't apply this
> rule - you get the default hash implementation from object no matter
> what:
>
> Py> class NotHashable(object):
> ... def __cmp__(self, other):
Terry Reedy wrote:
To avoid the redundancy of 'a' and '_a', etc, how about (untested):
def dispvia(f):
dispatch[f.__name__.split('_')[1]] = f
return f
A similar idea:
Py> class DispatchTable(dict):
... def __init__(self, prefix=""):
... self._prefix = prefix
... self._ignored = len(pr
Bengt Richter wrote:
> >>> m = object()
> >>> m.title = 'not so fast ;-)'
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "", line 1, in ?
> AttributeError: 'object' object has no attribute 'title'
>>> m = object()
>>> m.title = 'yeah, that's stupid'
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "", li
"Charlie Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I find that I use lambda functions mainly for callbacks to things like
> integration or root finding routines as follows.
>
> flow = integrate(lambda x: 2.0*pi * d(x)* v(x) * sin(a(x)),xBeg, xEnd)
>
> root = findRoot
On Sat, 18 Dec 2004 08:39:47 +0100, "Fredrik Lundh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Carl Banks wrote:
>
>> For example:
>>
>> .def lookup_reference(key):
>> .
>> .return Bunch(title=title,author=author,...)
>>
>> The code quickly and easily returns a object with the desired key
Andrew Dalke wrote:
Huh? I'm talking about my views of myself. I said that
BASIC was a programming language I could learn without access
to anyone else, on a microcomputer circa 1982. All I had was
the book that came with the computer, and after a while a
book on BASIC games.
The machine I had w
"Bengt Richter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Looks like your standard pattern could be updated:
>
> >>> dispatch = {}
> >>>
> >>> def dispvia(name):
> ... def _(f, name=name):
> ... dispatch[name] = f
> ... return f
> ... return _
> ...
> >
Adam DePrince wrote:
On Fri, 2004-12-17 at 09:25, Steve Holden wrote:
Or make any given standard python object accessible from MS Excel in 2
minutes.
What you describe is a political, not technical, challenge.
What I describe is a daily costumer demand.
Like or not, the world uses Excel and co
91 matches
Mail list logo
