Re: [Python-buildbots] Idea: have a different buildbot server for unstable workers?

2019-03-08 Thread Victor Stinner
Le jeu. 7 mars 2019 à 21:19, Michael a écrit : > I think "ouch" - as I have been working hard to get all the tests to > pass for AIX. I feel "defeated". Congrats :-) But that only for 3.x branch: 2.7 and 3.7 branches are still red. Can we simply remove AIX jobs on 2.7 and 3.7 branches? Or does an

Re: [Python-buildbots] Idea: have a different buildbot server for unstable workers?

2019-03-08 Thread Victor Stinner
Le ven. 8 mars 2019 à 09:11, Victor Stinner a écrit : > Oh wait, I wasn't aware of that. Is it something new? I confirm that I > saw this code in master.cfg: > > if stability == STABLE: > mail_status_builders.append(buildername) > github_status_builders.append(build

Re: [Python-buildbots] Idea: have a different buildbot server for unstable workers?

2019-03-08 Thread Michael Felt
On 3/8/2019 9:47 AM, Victor Stinner wrote: > Le ven. 8 mars 2019 à 09:11, Victor Stinner a écrit : >> Oh wait, I wasn't aware of that. Is it something new? I confirm that I >> saw this code in master.cfg: >> >> if stability == STABLE: >> mail_status_builders.append(buildername

[Python-buildbots] Email notifications enabled again on unstable builders

2019-03-08 Thread Victor Stinner
but disabled on custom builders. I deployed the new configuration: https://github.com/python/buildmaster-config/commit/e85208dd39ad55741273b662348bc1b1d4c42d74 Victor -- Night gathers, and now my watch begins. It shall not end until my death. ___ Pyth

Re: [Python-buildbots] Idea: have a different buildbot server for unstable workers?

2019-03-08 Thread Victor Stinner
Le ven. 8 mars 2019 à 10:44, Michael Felt a écrit : > I am fine with running only on the master branch - as I long gave up the > fight for back-porting. Hard enough to get people to look at master > (emote: speaking - so also see a smile). For 2.7 the view has been, for > as long as I have been tr