Zachary Ware
writes:
> I'm not sure about bolen-ubuntu, but I figured its issues are most
> likely slave- (or slave-environment-) related due to the fact that all
> branches are failing and the other Ubuntu bots are fine. I did notice
> that bolen-ubuntu seems to have a pretty old OpenSSL (1.0.1
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 5:12 PM, Zachary Ware
wrote:
> +angelico-debian-amd64 - all green
Just FYI, I'm currently experiencing a partial network outage, which
is impacting my ability to connect to the build farm. So these guys
are probably all offline at the moment; they should be up again within
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 5:56 PM, David Bolen wrote:
> Just an FYI related to these:
>
>> "Iffy" (have failures that look related to the slave, but are
>> platforms that should be stable. If I reshuffle right now, they'll be
>> marked unstable):
>> bolen-ubuntu
>> bolen-windows
>> bolen-windows8
>
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 10:39 AM, R. David Murray wrote:
> I do think we
> want to resolve the bolen issues and not just move them to unstable,
> though.
I agree with that.
> It looks like jcea brought the OpenIndiana buildbot back on-line,
> but it seems to have gotten into trouble processing t
On Thu, 19 Nov 2015 04:04:37 +1100, Kubilay Kocak wrote:
> On 19/11/2015 3:39 AM, R. David Murray wrote:
> > It would be nice to have that bot back, since IIRC it was one of the
> > fastest and so gave quick feedback on bad changesets.
>
> If mine are no longer the fastest, I have more work to do
On 19/11/2015 3:39 AM, R. David Murray wrote:
> It would be nice to have that bot back, since IIRC it was one of the
> fastest and so gave quick feedback on bad changesets.
If mine are no longer the fastest, I have more work to do :]
___
Python-Buildbots
On Mon, 16 Nov 2015 17:40:50 -0600, Zachary Ware
wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 3:15 PM, Zachary Ware
> wrote:
> > I had intended to audit all of the builders and come up with a new
> > stable set months ago, but it hasn't happened yet. I'll see whether I
> > can find some time to get anywher
Just an FYI related to these:
> "Iffy" (have failures that look related to the slave, but are
> platforms that should be stable. If I reshuffle right now, they'll be
> marked unstable):
> bolen-ubuntu
> bolen-windows
> bolen-windows8
> bolen-windows10
I've watched them consistently failing for a
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 3:15 PM, Zachary Ware
wrote:
> I had intended to audit all of the builders and come up with a new
> stable set months ago, but it hasn't happened yet. I'll see whether I
> can find some time to get anywhere on that this week.
Here's the breakdown as I see it currently:
"
On Mon, 16 Nov 2015 16:11:54 -0500, David Edelsohn wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 3:46 PM, R. David Murray
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 17 Nov 2015 07:38:11 +1100, Chris Angelico wrote:
> >> AMD64 Debian Root, which I host, has been fairly consistently green.
> >> Should that be declared stable? It's
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 12:11 PM, David Edelsohn wrote:
> What's the plan about updating the list of stable builders?
>
> The current stable builders don't appear very stable (not all green).
> There are other builders that are stable and should be added to the
> stable builders list.
I had inten
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 3:46 PM, R. David Murray wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Nov 2015 07:38:11 +1100, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> AMD64 Debian Root, which I host, has been fairly consistently green.
>> Should that be declared stable? It's proving that the test suite can
>> run with full root privileges.
>
>
On Tue, 17 Nov 2015 07:38:11 +1100, Chris Angelico wrote:
> AMD64 Debian Root, which I host, has been fairly consistently green.
> Should that be declared stable? It's proving that the test suite can
> run with full root privileges.
Sound good to me.
The ones mentioned in the other email I want
On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 5:35 AM, R. David Murray wrote:
>> There are other builders that are stable and should be added to the
>> stable builders list.
>
> Do you have ones you'd like to nominate?
AMD64 Debian Root, which I host, has been fairly consistently green.
Should that be declared stable?
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 1:35 PM, R. David Murray wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Nov 2015 13:11:44 -0500, David Edelsohn wrote:
>> There are other builders that are stable and should be added to the
>> stable builders list.
>
> Do you have ones you'd like to nominate?
>
> It's probably time to put the docs
On Mon, 16 Nov 2015 13:11:44 -0500, David Edelsohn wrote:
> What's the plan about updating the list of stable builders?
>
> The current stable builders don't appear very stable (not all green).
At a quick glance it looks like those are bugs that need fixing, not
stability errors. We should ping
16 matches
Mail list logo
