Zachary Ware
writes:
> I'm not sure about bolen-ubuntu, but I figured its issues are most
> likely slave- (or slave-environment-) related due to the fact that all
> branches are failing and the other Ubuntu bots are fine. I did notice
> that bolen-ubuntu seems to have a pretty old OpenSSL (1.0.1
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 5:12 PM, Zachary Ware
wrote:
> +angelico-debian-amd64 - all green
Just FYI, I'm currently experiencing a partial network outage, which
is impacting my ability to connect to the build farm. So these guys
are probably all offline at the moment; they should be up again within
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 5:56 PM, David Bolen wrote:
> Just an FYI related to these:
>
>> "Iffy" (have failures that look related to the slave, but are
>> platforms that should be stable. If I reshuffle right now, they'll be
>> marked unstable):
>> bolen-ubuntu
>> bolen-windows
>> bolen-windows8
>
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 10:39 AM, R. David Murray wrote:
> I do think we
> want to resolve the bolen issues and not just move them to unstable,
> though.
I agree with that.
> It looks like jcea brought the OpenIndiana buildbot back on-line,
> but it seems to have gotten into trouble processing t
On Thu, 19 Nov 2015 04:04:37 +1100, Kubilay Kocak wrote:
> On 19/11/2015 3:39 AM, R. David Murray wrote:
> > It would be nice to have that bot back, since IIRC it was one of the
> > fastest and so gave quick feedback on bad changesets.
>
> If mine are no longer the fastest, I have more work to do
On 19/11/2015 3:39 AM, R. David Murray wrote:
> It would be nice to have that bot back, since IIRC it was one of the
> fastest and so gave quick feedback on bad changesets.
If mine are no longer the fastest, I have more work to do :]
___
Python-Buildbots
On Mon, 16 Nov 2015 17:40:50 -0600, Zachary Ware
wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 3:15 PM, Zachary Ware
> wrote:
> > I had intended to audit all of the builders and come up with a new
> > stable set months ago, but it hasn't happened yet. I'll see whether I
> > can find some time to get anywher
Just an FYI related to these:
> "Iffy" (have failures that look related to the slave, but are
> platforms that should be stable. If I reshuffle right now, they'll be
> marked unstable):
> bolen-ubuntu
> bolen-windows
> bolen-windows8
> bolen-windows10
I've watched them consistently failing for a
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 3:15 PM, Zachary Ware
wrote:
> I had intended to audit all of the builders and come up with a new
> stable set months ago, but it hasn't happened yet. I'll see whether I
> can find some time to get anywhere on that this week.
Here's the breakdown as I see it currently:
"
On Mon, 16 Nov 2015 16:11:54 -0500, David Edelsohn wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 3:46 PM, R. David Murray
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 17 Nov 2015 07:38:11 +1100, Chris Angelico wrote:
> >> AMD64 Debian Root, which I host, has been fairly consistently green.
> >> Should that be declared stable? It's
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 12:11 PM, David Edelsohn wrote:
> What's the plan about updating the list of stable builders?
>
> The current stable builders don't appear very stable (not all green).
> There are other builders that are stable and should be added to the
> stable builders list.
I had inten
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 3:46 PM, R. David Murray wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Nov 2015 07:38:11 +1100, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> AMD64 Debian Root, which I host, has been fairly consistently green.
>> Should that be declared stable? It's proving that the test suite can
>> run with full root privileges.
>
>
On Tue, 17 Nov 2015 07:38:11 +1100, Chris Angelico wrote:
> AMD64 Debian Root, which I host, has been fairly consistently green.
> Should that be declared stable? It's proving that the test suite can
> run with full root privileges.
Sound good to me.
The ones mentioned in the other email I want
On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 5:35 AM, R. David Murray wrote:
>> There are other builders that are stable and should be added to the
>> stable builders list.
>
> Do you have ones you'd like to nominate?
AMD64 Debian Root, which I host, has been fairly consistently green.
Should that be declared stable?
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 1:35 PM, R. David Murray wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Nov 2015 13:11:44 -0500, David Edelsohn wrote:
>> There are other builders that are stable and should be added to the
>> stable builders list.
>
> Do you have ones you'd like to nominate?
>
> It's probably time to put the docs
On Mon, 16 Nov 2015 13:11:44 -0500, David Edelsohn wrote:
> What's the plan about updating the list of stable builders?
>
> The current stable builders don't appear very stable (not all green).
At a quick glance it looks like those are bugs that need fixing, not
stability errors. We should ping
What's the plan about updating the list of stable builders?
The current stable builders don't appear very stable (not all green).
There are other builders that are stable and should be added to the
stable builders list.
Thanks, David
___
Python-Buildbot
17 matches
Mail list logo
