[Python-buildbots] Re: No more buildbot failure emails?

' > > Not sure this is related :( > > On Tue, 9 Aug 2022 at 23:34, Pablo Galindo Salgado > wrote: >> >> No idea, I will try to get a peek at the logs tomorrow. >> >> On Mon, 8 Aug 2022 at 18:41, Victor Stinner wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>

[Python-buildbots] No more buildbot failure emails?

Hi, Since July 23 or July 24, I don't get emails about buildbot failures anymore. Can it be a recent configuration change? 8484356 Remove ware-win81-release worker (#335) c896dd7 Promote WASM to tier 3, run parallel builds (#336) cd98a8b Use wasi-env script to set build parameters (#337) 6af4556

[Python-buildbots] Running the Python test suite leaks .pem files in /tmp

Hi, I noticed that for a few months, the Python test suite started to leak more and more files /tmp. After a few weeks, a machine can have between 2,000 and 50,000 temporary files created by Python. The filenames are random, but I noticed the issue on buildbot worker machines which only run Python

[Python-buildbots] Re: Request: Add AIX 7.3 buildbot worker

Hi, PEP 11 was recently deeply reworked to have "tiered platform support": https://peps.python.org/pep-0011/ AIX is not supported by Python by this updated PEP. You can add a new AIX buildbot worker, but results may be ignored if nobody pays attention to it. See https://github.com/python/buildmas

[Python-buildbots] Buildbot server dependencies updated

Hi, I updated buildbot server dependencies to get a fix for security vulnerability in Twisted: https://github.com/python/buildmaster-config/commit/723d57404f8d3f425c8f54c7bc7e8a12681ea757 https://github.com/python/buildmaster-config/security/dependabot/2 Victor -- Night gathers, and now my watc

[Python-buildbots] Re: [External] : Re: Oracle Solaris buildbot

Hi Jakub, I sent you a password in private. You can now create a pull request in the https://github.com/python/buildmaster-config/ project to register your worker. The two main files are master/custom/builders.py and master/custom/workers.py. You can look at the Git history to find examples. T

[Python-buildbots] Re: adding windows/arm64 buildbot worker

Hi Niyas, I sent you passwords in private. You can now create a pull request in the https://github.com/python/buildmaster-config/ project. The two main files are master/custom/builders.py and master/custom/workers.py. I don't know if you can simply reuse an existing recipe to build Python on Wi

[Python-buildbots] Re: [External] : Re: Oracle Solaris buildbot

Hi Jakub, What do you need? There is doc at: https://devguide.python.org/buildworker/ The buildbot configuration is managed by: https://github.com/python/buildmaster-config/ Example of commit adding a worker: https://github.com/python/buildmaster-config/commit/4cf6e5da5c5752e6be45bf4c6a3fbbb292

[Python-buildbots] Re: Fwd: [Python-Dev] Windows buildbots may be broken

The owner of AMD64 Windows8.1 Non-Debug is Zachary Ware . Victor On Thu, Sep 2, 2021 at 3:10 PM Jason R. Coombs wrote: > > This issue is still affecting build bot > 405: https://buildbot.python.org/all/#/builders/405 > > Can the owner of that buildbot please

[Python-buildbots] Re: Worker failures and restart

Some Twisted logs. I replaced the IP address with or in logs. I don't know what is the worker 52.179.5.160 which creates an Unicode error. 2021-08-16 12:34:45+ [Broker,] Got workerinfo from 'koobs-freebsd-9e36' 2021-08-16 12:34:45+ [Broker,] worker koobs-freebsd-9e36 cannot attach

[Python-buildbots] Re: Worker failures and restart

The traceback looks like a legit bug in Buildbot. You can try to report it to Buildbot: https://github.com/buildbot/buildbot Victor On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 2:47 PM David Edelsohn wrote: > > Yesterday, a large number of buildbots entered an error state. There > has been no comment here. I see t

[Python-buildbots] Re: Paused workers

the worker shows a pause icon next to it as its state on the > workers page or on its builds page. > > -- David > > On Wed, Aug 4, 2021 at 11:13 AM Victor Stinner wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I don't know what is this "pause" feature", what can c

[Python-buildbots] Re: Paused workers

Hi, I don't know what is this "pause" feature", what can cause a pause, nor how to resume a buildbot worker. "AMD64 Windows10 3.x" and "AMD64 Windows10 Pro 3.x" built Python successfully 5 hours ago. Does someone know if any other worker is paused? Victor On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 10:03 PM David

[Python-buildbots] Re: Migration of the aarch64 Fedora and RHEL buildbot to newer hardware

Wow, that's great! I looked at the latest green build (467) on aarch64 Fedora Rawhide 3.x. The maximum system load is around 24.1, regrtest spawns 40 child processes, the tests take 4 min 20 sec. "0:00:00 load avg: 3.48 Run tests in parallel using 40 child processes (timeout: 15 min, worker timeo

[Python-buildbots] Re: buildbots

Hi, Right now, I see a single macOS buildbot worker: https://buildbot.python.org/all/#/workers/17 Admin: Matt Billenstein Host: "ProductName: Mac OS X ProductVersion: 10.15.5 BuildVersion: 19F101" Hopefully, there is also a macOS CI run on pull requests, but it's not **required**. It's possible

[Python-buildbots] buildmaster-config default branch becomes "main"

Hi, I renamed https://github.com/python/buildmaster-config default branch to "main". If you have a local checkout, you can rename your local "master" branch with these commands: --- git branch -m master main git fetch origin git branch -u origin/main main git remote set-head origin -a --- For th

[Python-buildbots] Re: Build-bots and IPv6 only servers, redo AIX bots for more isolation (cleanliness) of build environments

That's the wrong place to discuss such topic. I suggest you to discuss it on python-dev or the bug tracker. https://bugs.python.org/issue37897 https://bugs.python.org/issue37898 https://bugs.python.org/issue37901 https://bugs.python.org/issue37895 https://bugs.python.org/issue37899 Victor Le jeu

[Python-buildbots] Re: Buildbot for SmartOS

Hi, You may discuss SmartOS buildbot on https://bugs.python.org/issue42173 Setting up a buildbot is nice but not enough. We also need someone who will handle every failure, analyze the issue, report issues to bugs.python.org, and then (if possible) fix these issues. Also, right now, there are st

[Python-buildbots] ACTION NEEDED: upgrade your buildbot client configuration

Hi Buildbot owners, You need to manually update your buildbot owner clients configuration: * Change the buildbot server host to: buildbot-api.python.org (it was buildbot.python.org previously) * Change the keepalive to: 60 (seconds, it was usually 600 previously) You should also clean up manuall

[Python-buildbots] Re: illumos buildbot

Hi, There are some conditions support a new platform in Python: https://pythondev.readthedocs.io/platforms.html#i-want-cpython-to-support-my-platform What is the current state of Illumos support? How many tests fail? Who is going to propose fixes for failing tests? Who is going to review these pa

[Python-buildbots] Re: No notification mails for AIX bots - why?

The two AIX 3.x buildbot workers are back to green. I reenabled email notifications for AIX. But if a worker breaks again and nobody is able to fix the issue fast enough, I will disable notifications again. The problem is that we have disk space issues on the buildbot server, and so sometimes we

[Python-buildbots] Re: No notification mails for AIX bots - why?

Email notifications are disabled on: * PPC64 AIX because of https://bugs.python.org/issue36273 * POWER6 AIX because of https://bugs.python.org/issue36752 https://github.com/python/buildmaster-config/blob/master/master/master.cfg#L140 Is there any progress on these issues? Victor Le dim. 8 mars

[Python-buildbots] Re: Buildbot master hung?

Hi, Which workers are you looking for? Is your issue solved in the meantime? Victor Le mer. 19 févr. 2020 à 17:13, David Edelsohn a écrit : > > I see a lot of builders not updated since yesterday and showing builds > in progress while the builders themselves are idle. > > - David >

[Python-buildbots] Re: Refleak 2.7 buildbot jobs are gone

I don't see the point of keeping 2.7 jobs after the 2.7 branch will get its last commit. So yeah, the plan to disable last 2.7 jobs after the last 2.7 release. Victor Le mar. 11 févr. 2020 à 11:44, Kyle Stanley a écrit : > > Victor Stinner wrote: > > Regular buildbot jobs tri

[Python-buildbots] Re: Additon of PPC64LE workers to the CI fleet

I merged your pull request and deployed the new configuration. That's a lot of new workers, cool! I already excited to see new random bugs from the outer space ;-) Victor Le ven. 7 févr. 2020 à 18:43, Charalampos Stratakis a écrit : > > Hi folks, > > Thanks to the awesome people managing the th

[Python-buildbots] Refleak 2.7 buildbot jobs are gone

Hi, Since the Python 2.7 branch no longer accept commits, I disabled the Refleak 2.7 jobs: https://github.com/python/buildmaster-config/commit/67468e1fca8d6df8dd5215c55d1c3dbc384b1ca8 Regular buildbot jobs triggered on commits into the 2.7 are still enabled, but there is no more commit in this b

[Python-buildbots] Disk is full on buildbot server

Hi, I had to clear old journalctl logs to free some space on buildbot: the disk was full and so Twisted failed in a database error. I had to kill the stuck process with SIGKILL. I restarted the process, but the problem will come back back soon. We should either stop to store large XML files, rem

[Python-buildbots] Re: Concerning the security of third-party buildbots

Hi, Here is the Python buildbot security documentation: https://devguide.python.org/buildworker/#security-considerations Victor Le mar. 28 janv. 2020 à 08:35, A via Python-Buildbots a écrit : > > I'm concerned with the security of buildbots which are provided by > third-party individuals and o

[Python-buildbots] Re: A RHEL8 s390x machine ready to join the fleet

First try to remove it manually. Python should not create such file. Victor Le lun. 27 janv. 2020 à 17:31, David Edelsohn a écrit : > > On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 11:08 AM Victor Stinner wrote: > > > > David: by the way, you would mind to have a look at > > https://bugs.py

[Python-buildbots] Re: A RHEL8 s390x machine ready to join the fleet

David: by the way, you would mind to have a look at https://bugs.python.org/issue39248 ? It looks like an issue on this specific worker, /tmp/subprocess.py should be removed manually. Victor ___ Python-Buildbots mailing list -- python-buildbots@python.or

[Python-buildbots] Re: My einat-ubuntu worker

There is the "-u" option of regrtest to disable "largefile" or "cpu" resources for example. About memory, there is the -M option. But I'm not sure that tests using up to 500 MB are flagged using @bigmem decorator which uses the -M option. 0.5 GB of memory sounds quite small. Victor Le mar. 7 jan

[Python-buildbots] Re: koobs-freebsd-564d has bad OpenSSL version

It's failing since Nov 15 because of an OpenSSL upgrade/conf change on the worker: https://bugs.python.org/issue38815 Victor Le lun. 9 déc. 2019 à 17:26, Łukasz Langa a écrit : > > See: https://buildbot.python.org/all/#/builders/18 > > > AMD64 Fre

[Python-buildbots] Re: Buildbot build prefixes changed

n. 27 sept. 2019 à 15:40, David Edelsohn a écrit : > > Is this only an issue for systems with Clang installed? I don't see > that range of names on any of my workers. > > Thanks, David > > On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 9:36 AM Victor Stinner wrote: > > > > Le ven

[Python-buildbots] Re: Buildbot build prefixes changed

Le ven. 27 sept. 2019 à 15:14, David Edelsohn a écrit : > Hi, Victor > > Where, exactly, should I look for abandoned build directories? It's in the directory configured in your buildbot client. Example with the Fedora Rawhide worker: buildbot@python-builder-rawhide$ pwd /home/buildbot/buildarea

[Python-buildbots] Buildbot build prefixes changed

Hi, You may have to manually cleanup old directories on your buildbot workers. Sorry, I don't know the process how to do that. If someone finds a way, please share it! -- To be able to support multiple similar jobs on the same buildbot worker, the build prefixes have been modified last week: htt

[Python-buildbots] List migrated to Mailman 3

Hi, FYI Mark Sapiro converted python-buildbots mailing list from Mailman 2 to Mailman 3: https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-buildbots.python.org/ Using Mailman 3, subscriptions are simpler: single login/password for multiple mailing lists, click on a button to subscribe/unsubscribe, et

Re: [Python-buildbots] Windows ARM32 buildbot

In my experience, running tests sequentially is unsafe. I prefer to use -j1: "Run tests in parallel using 1 child processes" A new process is spawned for each test file. It reduces the risk of side effects between 2 test files. Victor Le lun. 1 juil. 2019 à 16:32, Paul Monson via Python-Buildbot

[Python-buildbots] New cleantest step on buildbots: remove old test_python_xxx directories

Hi, Since the end of last week, test_regrtest started to fail on more and more buildbots, especially on x86 Gentoo Installed with X 3.x, with an error message which contains: RuntimeWarning: tests may fail, unable to create temporary directory '/buildbot/tmp/tmpdir/test_python_28144': [Errno 17]

Re: [Python-buildbots] Current build stuck for four days(!)

It is the first for a very long time that I see a buildbot stuck in a loop and don't produce any output. The main test runner process should write the progress every 30 seconds. But here the job ran for 3 days. Maybe it is a regression un test_asyncio, but it doesn't explain why the main process fa

Re: [Python-buildbots] fyi: The AIX bots are in "failure" state for over a week.

Le mar. 21 mai 2019 à 12:32, Michael a écrit : > On 20/05/2019 22:50, Michael wrote: > Short part - re: one test seems to be a clear regression > (https://bugs.python.org/issue36816) - that I hit when building from > github manually. This one is now fixed, no? > Two tests - are regressions in bo

Re: [Python-buildbots] fyi: The AIX bots are in "failure" state for over a week.

Currently, the main issue on AIX is https://bugs.python.org/issue36084 which broke AIX. I asked to either fix the issue or revert. Victor Le lun. 20 mai 2019 à 23:07, Michael a écrit : > > My bot has always failed die to issues with xlc versus gcc. The other > AIX bot is not something I own. I s

[Python-buildbots] Random failure when deploying the new buildbot config

Hi, I just deployed the new config for https://github.com/python/buildmaster-config/pull/88 but I got an assertion error which gone away when I re-run "buildbot reconfig master". Should I worry or not? buildbot@virt-et2yi0:~$ /data/buildbot/venv/bin/buildbot checkconfig master/master.cfg Config f

Re: [Python-buildbots] Windows 8.1 worker (bolen-worker8) retirement

Right now, I still see worker in buildbot configuration. Can I remove it? Or do you want to remove it? https://github.com/python/buildmaster-config/blob/master/master/master.cfg Victor Le jeu. 11 avr. 2019 à 08:14, David Bolen a écrit : > > My Windows 8.1 worker got hit on Wednesday by some "en

[Python-buildbots] Windows 3.x buildbots now also have a "load average"!

Thanks for Ammar Askar: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/8357/files https://bugs.python.org/issue34060 Example: https://ci.appveyor.com/project/python/cpython/builds/23768195 ... 0:04:40 load avg: 5.36 [321/420] test_xdrlib passed 0:04:41 load avg: 5.73 [322/420] test_future3 passed 0:04:4

Re: [Python-buildbots] Windows 8.1 worker (bolen-worker8) retirement

Thanks for providing this Windows 8.1 worker! Bye bye Windows 8.1 and its annoying Start Menu! Victor Le jeu. 11 avr. 2019 à 08:14, David Bolen a écrit : > > My Windows 8.1 worker got hit on Wednesday by some "encrypt the world" > ransomware. I'm not quite sure the path by which it reached the

Re: [Python-buildbots] Disable notifiations on broken workers

Ok, I deployed the new configuration. Victor Le jeu. 11 avr. 2019 à 02:23, Gregory P. Smith a écrit : > > > > On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 4:08 PM Victor Stinner wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I propose to disable email and IRC notifications on workers which were

[Python-buildbots] Disable notifiations on broken workers

Hi, I propose to disable email and IRC notifications on workers which were never green (tests always failed): https://github.com/python/buildmaster-config/pull/86 * Alpine Linux * Cygwin * "AMD64 Clang UBSan 3." (3.6, 3.7 and 3.x, surprisingly, 2.7 is green) Does anyone have a good reason to kee

Re: [Python-buildbots] Adding a Fedora Rawhide x86_64 to the buildbot fleet

erent architectures in the future, as well. > > - Original Message - > > From: "Victor Stinner" > > To: "Zachary Ware" > > Cc: "python-buildbo." > > Sent: Wednesday, April 3, 2019 4:25:55 PM > > Subject: Re: [Python-buildbo

Re: [Python-buildbots] Adding a Fedora Rawhide x86_64 to the buildbot fleet

I merged https://github.com/python/buildmaster-config/pull/85 to add the new "AMD64 Fedora Rawhide" jobs on "cstratak-fedora" worker ;-) Victor Le sam. 30 mars 2019 à 17:37, Zachary Ware a écrit : > You can expect an email from me shortly with your worker name and > password. Once you have that

Re: [Python-buildbots] Idea: have a different buildbot server for unstable workers?

Hello, Le dim. 24 mars 2019 à 16:32, Michael a écrit : > Understood - and have, after I better understood the reluctance for any > AIX related patch - took, I think it was yours (Victor) advice - worry > about master, and when that is done (all test pass) - re-evaluate. I told you that AIX is no

Re: [Python-buildbots] Idea: have a different buildbot server for unstable workers?

Le sam. 9 mars 2019 à 14:00, Michael a écrit : > I was actually think more of the backporting from master to 3.7 and 3.6. > It was made very clear to me well over a year ago that "nothing" would > be considered for 2.7. However, the issues I have been fixing have been > around forever. I guess I w

Re: [Python-buildbots] Idea: have a different buildbot server for unstable workers?

Le ven. 8 mars 2019 à 10:44, Michael Felt a écrit : > I am fine with running only on the master branch - as I long gave up the > fight for back-porting. Hard enough to get people to look at master > (emote: speaking - so also see a smile). For 2.7 the view has been, for > as long as I have been tr

[Python-buildbots] Email notifications enabled again on unstable builders

but disabled on custom builders. I deployed the new configuration: https://github.com/python/buildmaster-config/commit/e85208dd39ad55741273b662348bc1b1d4c42d74 Victor -- Night gathers, and now my watch begins. It shall not end until my death. ___ Pyth

Re: [Python-buildbots] Idea: have a different buildbot server for unstable workers?

Le ven. 8 mars 2019 à 09:11, Victor Stinner a écrit : > Oh wait, I wasn't aware of that. Is it something new? I confirm that I > saw this code in master.cfg: > > if stability == STABLE: > mail_status_builders.append(buildername) > github

Re: [Python-buildbots] Idea: have a different buildbot server for unstable workers?

Le jeu. 7 mars 2019 à 21:19, Michael a écrit : > I think "ouch" - as I have been working hard to get all the tests to > pass for AIX. I feel "defeated". Congrats :-) But that only for 3.x branch: 2.7 and 3.7 branches are still red. Can we simply remove AIX jobs on 2.7 and 3.7 branches? Or does an

Re: [Python-buildbots] Idea: have a different buildbot server for unstable workers?

I'm proposing to have a separated server to ensure that no notification is sent. But I would be fine with the following compromise: modifiy buildbot configuration (master.cfg) to disable notifications on broken workers (tests known to fail) and "*-custom" jobs. Victor -- Night gathers, and now my

[Python-buildbots] Idea: have a different buildbot server for unstable workers?

Hi, I'm working on getting green buildbot workers at https://buildbot.python.org/all/#/builders but they are many workers which are "known" to be broken. Recently, Cheryl asked me if she broke Alpine Linux... well, as far as I recall, this one has always been broken: Python doesn't support musl C

[Python-buildbots] Any advice for the good "size" of a Python buildbot worker?

Hi, We would like to add more buildbot workers for test Python on Fedora and RHEL, but I have no idea of the ideal "size" of a worker: * Number of CPUs? I guess that 2 CPUs is nice but 4 or more is better? * Memory size? At least 8 GB? * Minimum storage? Logs are sent to the buildbot server, so t

Re: [Python-buildbots] AIX bot stuck - FYI - and Happy New Year!

Can you try to attach the stuck processes in gdb and try to get a Python traceback using "thread apply all py-bt"? You might have to need to install python-gdb.py plugin... and you need a gdb which supports Python. Otherwise, you might try to use faulthandler... faulthandler is supposed to be enabl

Re: [Python-buildbots] __Janitor buildbot

-lifetime > > There has been some talk about hiding it from the UI since it can be > confusing to > end-users of buildbot: > > https://github.com/buildbot/buildbot/issues/3677 > > -- > Craig > > On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 11:53 PM Victor Stinner wrote: >> >>

[Python-buildbots] __Janitor buildbot

Hi, What is this builder "__Janitor"? It has no description and no branch, no operating system filled. Victor ___ Python-Buildbots mailing list Python-Buildbots@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-buildbots

Re: [Python-buildbots] Any interest in an Intel Ubuntu buildbot?

2018-07-02 15:25 GMT+02:00 Zachary Ware : > if we find ourselves in the same situation > that Gentoo did this week, your builder will be running untrusted code > and causing who knows what kind of mayhem. Oh, I'm not aware of this issue. What happened? > Do you have any particular kind of build y

[Python-buildbots] Add a new buildbot running tests with -Werror?

Hi, It's common that we introduce regressions when tests are run with -Werror: https://bugs.python.org/issue33613 https://bugs.python.org/issue33911 https://bugs.python.org/issue33912 Is there someone interested to modify an existing buildbot or maybe even add a new one to run tests with -Werror

Re: [Python-buildbots] Add a config for a clang-ubsan buildbot please

The configuration can be found at: https://github.com/python/buildmaster-config/blob/master/master/master.cfg You may try to write a pull request. Victor 2018-04-25 2:50 GMT+02:00 Gregory P. Smith : > The configure command needs to be: > > CC=clang LD=clang CFLAGS="-fsanitize=undefined" > LDFLAG

[Python-buildbots] Internal buildbot error?

Hi, What is the following failure? Can it be an internal buildbot bot? http://buildbot.python.org/all/#/builders/69/builds/75 error in RunProcess._startCommand Traceback (most recent call last): File "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.7/lib/python2.7/site-packages/buildslave/runpr

[Python-buildbots] Fwd: Sierra OSX buildbot replaced with another machine running High Sierra

IMHO python-build...@python.org is a better place for such announcement. Victor -- Forwarded message -- From: Matt Billenstein Date: 2017-11-10 0:43 GMT+01:00 Subject: Sierra OSX buildbot replaced with another machine running High Sierra To: Victor Stinner Cc : buildbot-sta

Re: [Python-buildbots] 3.6 and 2.7 buildbots not active

> I've restarted the master, we'll see if that makes any difference. http://buildbot.python.org/all/#/grid still only gives "master" as choice for the branch. Moreover, I don't see 2.7 nor 3.6 workers on this page. http://buildbot.python.org/all/#/waterfall also only shows "3.x" workers, and doe

Re: [Python-buildbots] 3.6 and 2.7 buildbots not active

Hum, it seems like a configuration issue, since 2.7 and 3.6 *are* tested. Example of recent builds on 2.7: http://buildbot.python.org/all/#/builders/101 Victor 2017-11-08 17:22 GMT+01:00 Xavier de Gaye : > I don't see any 3.6 or 2.7 buildbot in the Console or Grid View. > > Xavier >

Re: [Python-buildbots] Outdated wiki information

FYI python.org is now managed on http://github.com/python/pythondotorg/ Victor 2017-10-13 21:55 GMT+02:00 Craig Rodrigues : > This page: > https://www.python.org/dev/buildbot/ > > should probably be changed to from "buildbot slave" to "buildbot worker" > > These two wiki pages related to buildbot

Re: [Python-buildbots] Looking up status of build bots?

Hi, Zachary Ware migrated the buildbot server to 0.9 last weekend. It changes a *lot* of things. It will need a few days (or weeks?) to adapt our workflow and habits to the new version. Our buildbot configuratioin can maybe be also enhanced to better use buildbot features. -- The generic link no

Re: [Python-buildbots] Moving Python.org to Buildbot 9 + Python 3

I talked with Zach on IRC. He wants to move everything to buildbot nine right now. Well, if he takes the responsability, I'm totally fine with that. Let me elaborate. If a few workers are broken, we can skip them to give time to the buildbot owner to fix them, or give us time to fix their config.

Re: [Python-buildbots] Moving Python.org to Buildbot 9 + Python 3

2017-10-06 21:35 GMT+02:00 Craig Rodrigues : > http://buildbot.python.org/test/ The new UI LGTM. It seems like email notifications are also working. So everything seems to be ready from my point of view. I propose right now to start moving (slowly) buildbot slaves from the old buildbot 0.8/Python

Re: [Python-buildbots] OpenSSL versions on builders

2017-09-04 22:16 GMT+02:00 Christian Heimes : > RHEL 7.4 comes with OpenSSL 1.0.2: > > https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2017:1929 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276310 "Description of problem: Node.js v4.2 depends on OpenSSL 1.0.2 which is not present in RHEL" Python is not a

Re: [Python-buildbots] Email notifications on buildbot failures

2017-05-09 18:11 GMT+02:00 Zachary Ware : >> Agreed. Maybe a new list "buildbot-sta...@python.org"? > > I'd agree with this, or with using python-checkins@. Dusty, commented > code in the master config looks like notifications used to go there, > but it was before my time and I don't know why it w

Re: [Python-buildbots] Email notifications on buildbot failures

2017-05-09 18:04 GMT+02:00 Chris Angelico : > Agreed. Maybe a new list "buildbot-sta...@python.org"? Ok. I like this name. Victor ___ Python-Buildbots mailing list Python-Buildbots@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-buildbots

[Python-buildbots] Email notifications on buildbot failures

Hi, I would like to get an email notification each time the state of a buildbot changed from green (success) to red (failed). Maybe we can start with the master branch, but my long term plan is to watch all branches (especially 2.7, 3.5, 3.6 and master), but maybe exclude the special custom build