Greetings!
IBM would like to add an AIX 7.3 worker to the existing AIX 7.2
worker. We suggest
edelsohn-aix73-ppc64
as the name. Could this be added to the worker configuration and then
I can issue a pull request for the configuration of the builders. The
system will be hosted at OSUOSL, as wi
___
Python-Buildbots mailing list -- python-buildbots@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-buildbots-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-buildbots.python.org/
Member address: arch...@mail-archive.com
On Wed, Dec 1, 2021 at 1:42 AM Chris Angelico wrote:
>
> Just upgraded the Debian Root buildbot from Jessie to Bullseye, and
> now the buildbot won't start. The log is somewhat unhelpful, saying
> only that there's unexpected content in buildbot.tac. Can someone
> provide a copy of a current build
Yesterday, a large number of buildbots entered an error state. There
has been no comment here. I see that some of the failing buildbots
have recovered. I don't know if they explicitly were restarted, e.g.,
cstratak-RHEL8-ppc64le. The AIX and MacOS builders remain paused.
I have restarted the A
Hi!
Is it best to ask this question here? Or open an issue in the Github
repo? Or create pull requests?
Thanks, David
On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 3:25 PM David Edelsohn wrote:
>
> Michael Felt and I have created a new VM at OSUOSL as a dedicated
> Python buildbot for AIX. I plan to s
Michael Felt and I have created a new VM at OSUOSL as a dedicated
Python buildbot for AIX. I plan to switch the buildbot from the GCC
Compile Farm AIX system to the dedicated system.
I would like to add an XLC builder to the worker. Can someone help
with the configuration file changes for the bu
FYI, I am in the process of updating the SLES s390x worker to SLES 15.
Thanks, David
___
Python-Buildbots mailing list -- python-buildbots@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-buildbots-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists
On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 6:00 AM Michael Felt wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I do not recall ever reading about instructions for having a buildbot on
> an IPv6 only server. As I have not done ' a lot' with IPv6 only hosts -
> I was wondering if there is also an IPv6 address (or is an IPv6 lookup
> of the s
The Debian Z (s390x) buildbot has been upgraded to Debian 10 Buster.
The latest Builtbot Worker also has been installed.
Thanks David
___
Python-Buildbots mailing list -- python-buildbots@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-buildbots-le...@
One of my Z systems recently ran out of disk space. It appears that
builders for 3.9 were added, builders for 2.7 were decommissioned, but
the 2.7 directories were not removed.
Are 2.7 directories suppose to be removed automatically?
Thanks, David
___
On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 12:36 PM Charalampos Stratakis
wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "David Edelsohn"
> > To: "python-buildbo."
> > Sent: Friday, March 6, 2020 5:36:28 PM
> > Subject: [Python-buildbots] Python buildbot master
I received email messages that a number of the s390x workers are
missing, but the systems are up, Buildbot workers are running, the
systems are reachable, sufficient diskspace. The buildbot master
shows the workers as online. However, a lot of recent testsuite
failures.
Any idea what's going on?
the meantime?
>
> Victor
>
> Le mer. 19 févr. 2020 à 17:13, David Edelsohn a écrit :
> >
> > I see a lot of builders not updated since yesterday and showing builds
> > in progress while the builders themselves are idle.
> >
> > - David
> >
I see a lot of builders not updated since yesterday and showing builds
in progress while the builders themselves are idle.
- David
___
Python-Buildbots mailing list -- python-buildbots@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-buildbots-le...@pyt
I have been trying to keep s390x rawhide up to date.
An update yesterday caused the system to complain about inability to
resolve github.com although it retained the connection to buildbot
master. The system then wedged. We could not boot with the current
kernel. Reverting to the previous kernel
ation variants, we will need separate resources anyway.
Thanks, David
On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 11:43 AM Victor Stinner wrote:
>
> First try to remove it manually. Python should not create such file.
>
> Victor
>
> Le lun. 27 janv. 2020 à 17:31, David Edelsohn a écrit :
> >
&
On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 11:08 AM Victor Stinner wrote:
>
> David: by the way, you would mind to have a look at
> https://bugs.python.org/issue39248 ? It looks like an issue on this
> specific worker, /tmp/subprocess.py should be removed manually.
Manually remove it once or some automation script?
On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 10:18 AM Charalampos Stratakis
wrote:
> - Original Message -
> > From: "David Edelsohn"
> > To: "Zachary Ware"
> > Cc: "Charalampos Stratakis" , "python-buildbo."
> >
> > Sent: Monday, Ja
On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 8:34 AM Zachary Ware wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 9:40 AM Charalampos Stratakis
> wrote:
> >
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > The team behind IBM's LinuxONE Community Cloud have provided me with an
> > s390x RHEL8 machine for joining the ranks of CPython's buildbot fleet
Is this only an issue for systems with Clang installed? I don't see
that range of names on any of my workers.
Thanks, David
On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 9:36 AM Victor Stinner wrote:
>
> Le ven. 27 sept. 2019 à 15:14, David Edelsohn a écrit :
> > Hi, Victor
> >
> >
The system at OSUOSL seems to have experienced a catastrophic failures.
- David
On Sat, Jun 23, 2018 at 7:49 PM Ned Deily wrote:
>
> David:
>
> I notice that starting sometime within the past 24 hours all of the buildbots
> on the edelsohn-fedora-ppc64le host are now catastrophically failing.
When another project tried to convert from Buildbot 0.8 to 0.9 earlier
this year, it was a total disaster and had to be reverted. I don't
know if 0.9 has improved substantially since then.
My experience is that 0.9 invested a lot of effort to make the UI
pretty, but it was much less usable. It al
The PPC64LE GNU Compile Farm system hosted at OSUOSL is being
re-installed with CentOS. When that is complete and stable, I will
re-connect the buildbot.
Thanks, David
___
Python-Buildbots mailing list
Python-Buildbots@python.org
https://mail.python.org
On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 8:20 PM, Zachary Ware wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> It has come to my attention that one of our members has been trying to
> send mail to the list and it has been silently disappearing. To
> determine whether this is a widespread issue, please reply-all to this
> message, sending to
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 11:27 AM, Zachary Ware
wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 10:21 PM, R. David Murray
> wrote:
>> On Fri, 18 Nov 2016 23:52:34 +, "Gregory P. Smith"
>> wrote:
>>> I *believe* where and how the buildbots pull code from is controlled
>>> entirely by the buildbot master/se
I have moved the Python buildslave for AIX to the new POWER8 system
running AIX 7.2 with new Open Source packages. We'll see if this
release of AIX fixes any of the testsuite failures due to AIX.
Let me know if there are any problems related to the new buildbot.
Thanks, David
___
I have updated the Debian s390x buildbot to a fresh install of Debien
jessie. Let me know if you see any problems.
Thanks, David
___
Python-Buildbots mailing list
Python-Buildbots@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-buildbots
Great!
Thanks for including the PPC64 Linux and s390x Linux systems.
- David
On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 1:17 PM, Zachary Ware
wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 12:01 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 1:09 AM, Zachary Ware
>> wrote:
>>> I had planned a few months ago to completely
Thu, 30 Jun 2016 13:16:46 -0400, David Edelsohn wrote:
>> The fingerprint needed to be updated in both PPC64 systems.
>>
>> I had better look at the Z systems as well.
>
> Out of curiosity, what's the reason for using the hardcoded fingerprint
> instead of jus
The fingerprint needed to be updated in both PPC64 systems.
I had better look at the Z systems as well.
- David
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 12:59 PM, Zachary Ware
wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 11:50 AM, David Edelsohn wrote:
>> I have updated the fingerprint in .hgrc.
>
> I
I have updated the fingerprint in .hgrc.
- David
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 12:01 PM, R. David Murray wrote:
> Infra has updated the cert that serves hg.python.org. If you have
> hardcoded the fingerprint in your slave's hg config you'll need
> to update it to:
>
> 31:d8:79:0f:ca:b5:c4:76:85:
The system that hosts the s390x buildbots is going to be offline for a
few days due to hardware maintenance migrating a storage system.
Thanks, David
___
Python-Buildbots mailing list
Python-Buildbots@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/p
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 3:46 PM, R. David Murray wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Nov 2015 07:38:11 +1100, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> AMD64 Debian Root, which I host, has been fairly consistently green.
>> Should that be declared stable? It's proving that the test suite can
>> run with full root privileges.
>
>
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 1:35 PM, R. David Murray wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Nov 2015 13:11:44 -0500, David Edelsohn wrote:
>> There are other builders that are stable and should be added to the
>> stable builders list.
>
> Do you have ones you'd like to nominate?
>
> It
What's the plan about updating the list of stable builders?
The current stable builders don't appear very stable (not all green).
There are other builders that are stable and should be added to the
stable builders list.
Thanks, David
___
Python-Buildbot
35 matches
Mail list logo
