Re: [Python-buildbots] Outdated wiki information

2017-10-13 Thread Craig Rodrigues
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 7:57 PM, Berker Peksağ wrote: > > > Can't we refer people to https://devguide.python.org/buildslave/ and > update all outdated information there? It looks like the buildbot > pages on the wiki mostly contain outdated and duplicate information. > That sounds like a perfect

Re: [Python-buildbots] Outdated wiki information

2017-10-13 Thread Berker Peksağ
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 10:55 PM, Craig Rodrigues wrote: > This page: > https://www.python.org/dev/buildbot/ > > should probably be changed to from "buildbot slave" to "buildbot worker" I've now changed "buildbot slave" to "buildbot worker" at https://www.python.org/dev/buildbot/. > These two wi

Re: [Python-buildbots] Outdated wiki information

2017-10-13 Thread Victor Stinner
FYI python.org is now managed on http://github.com/python/pythondotorg/ Victor 2017-10-13 21:55 GMT+02:00 Craig Rodrigues : > This page: > https://www.python.org/dev/buildbot/ > > should probably be changed to from "buildbot slave" to "buildbot worker" > > These two wiki pages related to buildbot

Re: [Python-buildbots] Moving Python.org to Buildbot 9 + Python 3

2017-10-13 Thread Craig Rodrigues
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 1:36 PM, David Bolen wrote: > Does testing include a mixture with a master under 3.x? I only ask since > I'd guess that a master under 2.x might be sending parameters down as > strings rather than unicode. > I've tested the following combinations of master 3.x <==> work

Re: [Python-buildbots] Moving Python.org to Buildbot 9 + Python 3

2017-10-13 Thread David Bolen
Does testing include a mixture with a master under 3.x? I only ask since I'd guess that a master under 2.x might be sending parameters down as strings rather than unicode. Anyway, no, I hadn't tried a new worker, because both the same and an earlier buildbot version was working fine on my Win8/10

Re: [Python-buildbots] Moving Python.org to Buildbot 9 + Python 3

2017-10-13 Thread Craig Rodrigues
Did you try leaving things on Python 2.6, but upgrading the worker to buidlbot-worker 0.9.12 ? buildbot-worker is still tested on Python 2.6. -- Craig On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 1:07 PM, David Bolen wrote: > Yes they look to be ok now. Although for future reference, both Windows > XP and 7 worker

Re: [Python-buildbots] Moving Python.org to Buildbot 9 + Python 3

2017-10-13 Thread David Bolen
Yes they look to be ok now. Although for future reference, both Windows XP and 7 workers did initially break - apparently due to an incompatibility when using Python < 2.7 on the worker (I have 2.6 on those machines). The master is sending remote methods down using unicode for method names. So 2

Re: [Python-buildbots] Outdated wiki information

2017-10-13 Thread Zachary Ware
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 2:55 PM, Craig Rodrigues wrote: > This page: > https://www.python.org/dev/buildbot/ > > should probably be changed to from "buildbot slave" to "buildbot worker" > > These two wiki pages related to buildbots have really > oudated information: > > https://wiki.python.org/moin

Re: [Python-buildbots] Moving Python.org to Buildbot 9 + Python 3

2017-10-13 Thread Craig Rodrigues
On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 1:46 PM, David Bolen wrote: > > Oh, and I can offer any of my Windows workers for interoperability > testing if you'd like me to temporarily configure them to an > additional master. At least one of them (XP) is probably not worth > the effort of getting to (a) vs. (b). >

[Python-buildbots] Outdated wiki information

2017-10-13 Thread Craig Rodrigues
This page: https://www.python.org/dev/buildbot/ should probably be changed to from "buildbot slave" to "buildbot worker" These two wiki pages related to buildbots have really oudated information: https://wiki.python.org/moin/BuildBot * references to "buildbot slave" should be changed to "build