New submission from Mike Gilbert :
In https://bugs.python.org/issue44751, crypt.h was removed from Python.h. This
would imply that libpython is not meant to expose any crypt-related symbols.
In fact, it looks like libpython does not use crypt() or crypt_r() at all.
These are only used by
Change by Mike Gilbert :
--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +27176
stage: -> patch review
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/28881
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issu
mike mcleod added the comment:
Hi,
I would like to help on this issue.
--
nosy: +mikecmcleod
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue2628>
___
___
mike mcleod added the comment:
Hi Ethan,
Thanks, awaiting reply..
Regards,
Mike
On Tue, 26 Oct 2021 at 01:36, Ethan Furman wrote:
>
> Ethan Furman added the comment:
>
> We don't have a CLA from jbell. I've sent an email asking him to do so...
&g
mike mcleod added the comment:
Hi,
I would like to help on this issue.
Let me know what can be done?
--
nosy: +mikecmcleod
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue10
mike mcleod added the comment:
I am happy to do any testing.
My reason for getting involved is I am new to helping with Cpython and thought
this may be the least intrusive way of getting started with something that
nobody really cares about that much.
Hence, the oldest issue I see can be
mike mcleod added the comment:
Hi Éric,
Then would the easiest way of dealing with this issue, to close it without
any further work?
Possibly adding to the documents it doesn't work on windows..
I can move to the next issue.
Regards,
Mike
On Sun, 31 Oct 2021 at 18:03, Éric Araujo
mike mcleod added the comment:
You're welcome.
Regards,
Mike
On Tue, 2 Nov 2021 at 05:52, Ethan Furman wrote:
>
> Ethan Furman added the comment:
>
> Ah. Well, in that case closing seems like the best idea.
>
> Thank you, Jonathan, for getting the CLA signed an
mike mcleod added the comment:
Should I go ahead and make the changes as per msg122208 ? on my local copy and
test?
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue10
mike mcleod added the comment:
I would like to help with this issue.
I note that a few changes need to be made to the code example for compatibility
for the latest version of Python. I can get this working but I am not sure this
is a good example. Also, the example is more about threads and
mike mcleod added the comment:
One of the things I did when the example code didn't work was to see what other
examples could be found and there are I would argue plenty or just enough, eg:
https://medium.com/analytics-vidhya/memory-mapping-files-and-mmap-module-in-python-with-lot-of-exa
mike mcleod added the comment:
I have put the question on Discuss and wait for (any) responses,
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue10
mike mcleod added the comment:
I would like to help with this issue.
I note that when I test against 3.10 this error does not show. Also, all tests
for test_tarfile pass.
I am wondering if it may be reasonable to close this due to the age and
currently its not an issue in the latest Python
mike mcleod added the comment:
I would like to help on this issue. I understand the arguments here but it has
been a lone time since this was raised and there does not seem to be any
further issues discussed or support for this issue.
--
nosy: +mikecmcleod
mike mcleod added the comment:
Hi Victor,
Ok I'll do that.
Regards,
Mike
On Thu, 18 Nov 2021 at 15:36, STINNER Victor wrote:
>
> STINNER Victor added the comment:
>
> I searched for open issues which contain "cgi" in their title. I found 43
> open issues
mike mcleod added the comment:
I would like to help with this issue.
I note the history (using Git Dag) of the modulefinder.py shows that it has
been modified with changes related here:
Author: Éric Araujo 2011-07-28 22:35:29
Committer: Éric Araujo 2011-07-28 22:35:29
Parent
mike mcleod added the comment:
Ok, I will work on this soon and make further comments.
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue1284670>
___
___
Pytho
mike mcleod added the comment:
I will work on this next week.
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue10483>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailin
mike mcleod added the comment:
I have made the changes as indicated in the diff files. I have tested against
the latest from my GitHub copy.
The result is:
./python -m test -j0
== CPython 3.11.0a2+ (heads/main:3a91617590, Dec 1 2021, 15:11:41) [GCC 11.2.0]
== Linux-5.13.0-22-generic-x86_64
mike mcleod added the comment:
Minor fix after test.
--
Added file: https://bugs.python.org/file50467/2.html
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue1284
Change by mike mcleod :
--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +28141
stage: -> patch review
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/29624
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issu
New submission from Mike Raider :
In the file
cpython/blob/master/Lib/html/entities.py
the HTML5 named character references (line 264) do not look consistent.
Some references have a semicolon at the end, some not, and some have both
variants.
Is there a reason for this
New submission from mike bayer :
When using unicode characters inside of JSON strings, values retrieved via the
JSON_EXTRACT SQLite function fail to be decoded by the sqlite3 driver if they
include four-byte unicode characters.
Version information for my build, which is Fedora 30:
Python
mike bayer added the comment:
Hi where did you report it?I don't see it on the mailing list or in their
fossil tracker.
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/is
mike bayer added the comment:
silly me thinking python devs had better access to SQLite devs :)
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue38
New submission from Mike Solin :
Hello Python developers!
I'm looking to deploy Python 3 silently to the Macs that I manage, so I can use
Python for various scripts. I'm using Munki to accomplish this. However, the
Python_Documentation.pkg subpackage includes this code in the p
Mike Frysinger added the comment:
> fundamentally: this shouldn't work anyways.
>
> You are calling wait() from a signal handler.
> That is a blocking operation.
> You cannot do that from a signal handler.
what definition/spec are you referring to here ? is this a Pyt
Mike Frysinger added the comment:
to be clear, there is no Python or OS restriction that you're aware of for your
earlier statement ? you just want to make it into a new Popen restriction that
didn't previously exist ?
we came across this bug as we upgraded our existing Python 2.
Mike Frysinger added the comment:
if threading.active_count() returns 1, then you know there's one thread, and
you're it, so it's not racey, and a lock ins't needed.
thinking a bit more, what if the code just use a recursive lock ? that would
restore the single threade
Mike Frysinger added the comment:
this would have been nice to have more than once in my personal projects, and
in build/infra tooling for Chromium OS. our alternatives so far have been the
obvious ones: use subprocess.run to capture & return the output, then manually
feed that as
New submission from Mike Frysinger :
a common idiom i run into is wanting to add/set one or two env vars when
running a command via subprocess. the only thing the API allows currently is
inherting the current environment, or specifying the complete environment.
this means a lot of copying
Mike Frysinger added the comment:
personally i still like having the extra_env setting explicitly broken out, but
i agree that those operators help ease the majority of the pain. i hadn't come
across them before as they aren't in Python 2.
i wouldn't be upset if people
Mike Hommey added the comment:
This is still a problem in python 3.7 (and, I guess 3.8).
When not even giving a max_workers, it fails with a ValueError exception on
_winapi.WaitForMultipleObjects, with the message "need at most 63 handles, got
a sequence of length 63"
That ha
New submission from mike dalrymple :
Downloaded Python 3.9.0
Documentation indicates:
math.sqrt(x)
Return the square root of x.
When I use in IDLE shell 3.9.0, I receive error:
>>> sqrt(25)
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "", line 1, in
sqrt(25)
NameError:
Change by mike bayer :
--
nosy: +zzzeek
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue16535>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
New submission from Mike Miller :
The Ctrl+L as clear-screen hotkey is supported just about everywhere, Unix and
Windows, with the exceptions of cmd.exe and python.exe interactive mode.
As the legacy cmd.exe can be easily replaced, that leaves python.exe. Likely
needs to be configured via
Mike Miller added the comment:
I found an implementation of this for Windows in case it is needed. Not sure
if it is the best way to do it, as the Console API is rather clumsy. However
this one works to my knowledge:
https://github.com/tartley/colorama/blob/master/colorama/winterm.py#L111
mike bayer added the comment:
> Under your proposal, the first line would be changed to say
> "autocommit=True", even though not all the code below is in autocommit mode
> (according to the SQLite engine's definition). What's more, I could insert
> this line
mike bayer added the comment:
I think this issue just discusses the naming of an attribute called
".autocommit". for the discussion for SQLite's unusual starting of
transactions, that's all in two other issues:
https://bugs.python.org/issue9924
https://bugs.python.
New submission from Mike Siegel :
Perhaps I'm missing something here but this behavior seems unexpected to me.
"Lists
The items of a list are arbitrary Python objects. Lists are formed by
placing a *comma-separated* list of expressions in square brackets. (Note that
there are
New submission from Mike Jarvis :
I had a function for making a logger proxy that could be safely passed to
multiprocessing workers and log back to the main logger with essentially the
following code:
```
import logging
from multiprocessing.managers import BaseManager
class SimpleGenerator
New submission from mike stern :
I noticed i big problem making a simple increment of .1 in python 3.7
using while
the result is wrong
i=0
while i < 1.2:
i += 0.1
print(i)
result
== RESTART: C:/Users/icosf/AppData/Local/Programs/Python/Python37-32/bb.py ==
0.1
0.2
0.30
mike stern added the comment:
problem actually more serious, it is here print(0.7+0.1) , which gives
.7999
same thing when adding the .1 increment to 4.8 , 5.1 etc ...
I am not sure of the pattern but it is acting up with some numbers
who will fix this , this is serious
I wouldn
mike stern added the comment:
so anybody can close a ticket ?
anybody can say their point of view and close a ticket, is that how it goes?
this is not serious
who is managing this ?
is this how we can trust a programming language?
it sounds like we are dealing with irresponsible kids here
Change by mike stern :
--
nosy: -serhiy.storchaka, terry.reedy
title: increment is wrong in 3.7 -> increment is wrong in 3.7 but not in 2.7
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issu
mike stern added the comment:
Christian Heimes why did you close it
--
status: closed -> open
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue40981>
___
_
mike stern added the comment:
Christian Heimes you haven't tried it on 2.7 did you ?
--
status: closed -> open
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org
mike stern added the comment:
what is rude is to talk to me in an autoritative way like you do
you haven't even checked what I said , I said it working in Python 2.7 and it
is not in 3.7
and you want to just read me an article.
From: report=bugs.p
mike stern added the comment:
you can at least try it and see for yourself that what I am saying is actually
true
but never mind I will keep on opening tickets until someone tries it on 2.7 and
see what I am talking about
From: Redwane Freedom Is-to-Be-With
mike stern added the comment:
you can at least try it and see for yourself that what I am saying is actually
true
but never mind I will keep on opening tickets until someone tries it on 2.7 and
see what I am talking about
From: Redwane Freedom Is-to-Be-With
mike stern added the comment:
I appreciate taking the time to explain , I just wished the other guys did that
instead of just closing the ticket on my face.
I wished at least they suggested me to use round() without any aggravations
but thanks anyway
From
mike stern added the comment:
sorry but I don't see the option to delete
From: report=bugs.python@roundup.psfhosted.org
on behalf of Terry J. Reedy
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2020 11:46 AM
To: rskir...@hotmail.com
Subject: [issue40981] increment is
Change by Mike Weilgart :
--
keywords: +patch
nosy: +Weildcard
nosy_count: 6.0 -> 7.0
pull_requests: +20107
stage: needs patch -> patch review
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/20928
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.p
New submission from mike stern :
please I would like to know why python changes an integer result in a division
to a float even in the result is even
like print(2 / 2) gives 2.0 instead of 2
or
a = 2 / 2
print(a)
--
components: Interpreter Core
messages: 372033
nosy: rskir
mike stern added the comment:
Not satisfied with that reply
you can't just decide to close the ticket without even giving a reasonable
answer, or even try that on 2.7 or 3.7 to see if it is true what I said.
Besides, that is not a convincing answer, that is actually no answer at all!
mike stern added the comment:
I appreciate your answer
I just didn't like how she answered earlier saying
I cannot reproduce. 2 / 2 gives 1.0 to me.
which is not true
thanks anyway, now i am gonna have to do some reading
From: report=bugs.p
mike stern added the comment:
sorry but that article was about version 2.2 in 2000
Created:11-Mar-2001
Python-Version: 2.2
where is the one for 3.7
From: report=bugs.python@roundup.psfhosted.org
on behalf of Tim Peters
Sent: Monday, June 22
mike stern added the comment:
i am calm
but sometimes I am wondering if the philosophy behind python is really like
they claimed to make it very simple. Well I see a lot of confusions sometimes ,
and this is one
From: report=bugs.python
mike bayer added the comment:
hey there,
I seem to have two cents to offer so here it is.An obscure issue in the
Python bug tracker is probably not the right place for this so consider this as
an early draft of something that maybe I'll talk about more elsewhere.
> This b
mike bayer added the comment:
> This recipe was one of the reasons why I added `loop.set_task_factory`
> method to the spec, so that it's possible to implement this in an *existing*
> event loop like uvloop. But ultimately asyncio is flexible enough to let
> users use the
mike bayer added the comment:
yes so if you have async/await all internal, are you saying you can make that
work for synchronous code *without* running the event loop? that is, some kind
of container that just does the right thing? my concern with that would still
be performance.When
mike bayer added the comment:
> With greenlets OTOH, it becomes possible for another task to observe
> someobj.a == 1 without someobj.b == 2, in case someobj.__setattr__ internally
> invoked an await_(). Any operation can potentially invoke a context switch.
> So debugging green
mike bayer added the comment:
> With greenlets OTOH, it becomes possible for another task to observe
> someobj.a == 1 without someobj.b == 2, in case someobj.__setattr__ internally
> invoked an await_().
let me try this one more time.Basically if someone wrote this:
async def
mike bayer added the comment:
> Oh, I thought the primary problem for SQLAlchemy supporting async is that the
> ORM needs to do IO from inside __getattr__ methods. So I assumed that the
> reason you were so excited about greenlets was that it would let you use
> await_() from
mike bayer added the comment:
slight correction: it is of course possible to use gevent with a database
driver without monkeypatching, as I wrote my own gevent benchmarks using
psycogreen. I think what I'm getting at is that it's a good thing if async
DBAPIs could target asyncio
mike bayer added the comment:
as far as cancellation, I gather you're referring to what in gevent / greenlet
is the GreenletExit exception. Sure, that thing is a PITA. Hence we're all
working to provide asyncio frontends and networking backends so that the
effects of canc
mike bayer added the comment:
I tested "cancellation", shutting down the DB connection mid query. Because
the greenlet is only in the middle and not at the endpoints, it propagates the
exception and there does not seem to be anything different except for the
greenlet sequence in
New submission from mike bayer :
This is likely related or a dupe of https://bugs.python.org/issue29270, but the
error message is different. I'm posting this to confirm it's the same issue,
or not, and to at least provide a google result for people who also see this
error as 2927
Change by Mike Frysinger :
--
assignee: -> docs@python
components: +Documentation
nosy: +docs@python
title: xml.dom.minidom.rst missed informations -> xml.dom.minidom.rst missing
standalone documentation
___
Python tracker
Change by Mike Frysinger :
--
title: xml.dom.minidom.Element.ownerDocument is hiden ->
xml.dom.minidom.Element.ownerDocument is hidden
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issu
New submission from Mike Frysinger :
$ python3
Python 3.8.5 (default, Aug 2 2020, 15:09:07)
[GCC 9.3.0] on linux
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> from xml.dom import minidom
# Lets parse a simple XM
Mike Hoy added the comment:
I am unable to work on this issue at this time.
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 8:57 PM, Éric Araujo wrote:
>
> Éric Araujo added the comment:
>
> Mike, if you don’t have the time to finish this shortly, I will do it, as
> I need this fixed for another bu
Mike Perry added the comment:
Hello,
I am still able to reproduce this issue with Python 3.2.2. It seems as if this
bug was closed with a the note:
r70039 3.1 forward ported > 3.2 > default. Will be in 3.2.1.
This leads me to believe that either 3.2.2 has a regression or the patch
Mike Perry added the comment:
Figured I should capture the exception. See below.
3.2.2+ (default, Jan 8 2012, 07:22:26)
[GCC 4.6.2]
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/idle3", line 5, in
main()
File "/usr/lib/python3.2/idlelib/PyShell.py"
Changes by Mike Frysinger :
--
nosy: +vapier
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue3754>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
mike bayer added the comment:
thanks for creating this issue Nick!
--
nosy: +zzzeek
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue37010>
___
___
Python-bug
Change by Mike Gleen :
--
pull_requests: +13990
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/14149
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue34
New submission from mike lojkovic :
Encode error on character '\u2193' was suggested by a tribler developer might
indicate a problem with python's handling of unicdoe in specific cases.
https://github.com/Tribler/tribler/issues/4666
--
components: Unicode
messag
New submission from Mike Lovelace :
On a system under heavy load last night Windows ran out of virtual memory, and
it appears that python interpreted that as the pyc files did not exist and
attempted to recreate them. In recreating them, it created essentially empty
files, which caused
mike bayer added the comment:
> Here is a pure Python PoC patch that allows unbounded Queue and LifoQueue to
> have reentrant put().
per http://bugs.python.org/msg275377 guido does not want an RLock here.
--
___
Python tracker
Changes by Mike Hoy :
--
nosy: +vexoxev
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue31153>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Mike Thomas added the comment:
Can this issue be reopened? As Jérémie stated, curl uses this format and
outputs cookie files using the #HttpOnly_ prefix. I also found at least one
project that is working around lack of this support:
https://code.google.com/archive/p/git-repo/
https
New submission from Mike McDonnal:
On my version of python 3.6.1 (v3.6.1:69c0db5, Mar 21 2017, 18:41:36) [MSC
v.1900 64 bit (AMD64)]
As well as on 3.6.2 for some other users I have spoken to there seams to be an
issue with the event for pressing the mouse button down.
The event or do not
Mike McDonnal added the comment:
OS Version - Windows 7 Pro
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue31483>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsub
Changes by Mike Hoy :
--
nosy: +vexoxev
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue9842>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Mike Pagel :
--
nosy: +mpagel
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue35148>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by mike bayer :
--
nosy: +zzzeek
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue35398>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Mike Pagel added the comment:
Dear developers on the nosy list: Would it be possible that someone does a
quick review of my related fix in https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/10696?
It is extremely simple and has minimal side effects, but would relieve us from
getting this annoying error
New submission from Mike Gilbert:
Some effort was made to port Python to OpenSSL 1.1.0 (see issue 26470).
However, the code still uses several deprecated functions, and fails to compile
against OpenSSL 1.1.0 if these functions are disabled.
This may be replicated by building OpenSSL with
Mike Gilbert added the comment:
Thanks for the reply.
OpenSSL 1.1.0 added functions to control the SSL/TLS version used by SSL
contexts created using TLS_method(). You might consider updating the code for
existing Python branches to use these functions.
SSL_CTX_set_min_proto_version
New submission from Mike Davies :
I wish to create a list of pathlib.Paths by combining two lists of
pathlib.Paths. I use two for loops to make every combination.
However the output is not what one would expect (see no 'Program Files' is
visible in the output).
##
Change by Mike Auty :
--
nosy: +ikelos
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue11588>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by mike bayer :
--
nosy: +zzzeek
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue36751>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
mike bayer added the comment:
if a function continues to work correctly throughout the span of a Python X
version, why does it need to be removed? I have a foggy memory but I don't
seem to recall functions that were technically redundant being aggressively
deprecated in the 2.x s
mike bayer added the comment:
> A deprecating warning doesn't hurt: you are still able to run your code.
this is very much untrue in modern testing environments, as it is common that
test suites fail on deprecation warnings, especially in libraries, to ensure
downstream compatibil
mike bayer added the comment:
> We are talking again and again that we have a lot of old things in the
> standard library but it seems that removing them is also a problem.
I agree that the reason we have these deprecation warnings is so that we do get
notified and we do fix them. I
mike bayer added the comment:
Just did some benchmarks, and while Signature has apparently had a big speedup
in Python 3.6, it is still much less performant than either the Python 2.7 or
Python 3.3 implementations, anywhere from 6-18 times slower approximately
depending on the function
New submission from Mike Lewis :
When using a timeout with check_output(), the call does not terminate unless
the child process generates output after the timeout. Looking at the code, it
appears there is a second call to communicate() after the timeout has happened,
presumably to retrieve
Mike Lewis added the comment:
Example of the output:
$ ./timeout.py
Subprocess with idle stdout at timeout: start at 1518081130.44
Timed out at: 1518081135.45, 5 seconds
Generating stdout from subprocess: start at 1518081135.45
Timed out at: 1518081136.47, 1 seconds
As you see, the 1 second
New submission from Mike Schmidt :
I am attempting to install python 3.6.4 to my home directory on a linux cluster
where I do not have root access. A warning, "linux/random.h present but cannot
be compiled", was emitted from the config process requesting that I report this
here. A
201 - 300 of 613 matches
Mail list logo