mike stern <rskir...@hotmail.com> added the comment:

you can at least try it and see for yourself that what I am saying is actually 
true

but never mind I will keep on opening tickets until someone tries it on 2.7 and 
see what I am talking about

________________________________
From: Redwane Freedom Is-to-Be-With-God <rskir...@hotmail.com>
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2020 2:45 AM
To: Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
Subject: Re: [issue40981] increment is wrong in 3.7 but not in 2.7

what is rude is to talk to me in an autoritative way like you do
you haven't even checked what I said , I said it working in Python 2.7 and it 
is not in 3.7
and you want to just read me an article.

________________________________
From: report=bugs.python....@roundup.psfhosted.org 
<report=bugs.python....@roundup.psfhosted.org> on behalf of Christian Heimes 
<rep...@bugs.python.org>
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2020 2:40 AM
To: rskir...@hotmail.com <rskir...@hotmail.com>
Subject: [issue40981] increment is wrong in 3.7 but not in 2.7

Christian Heimes <li...@cheimes.de> added the comment:

Python's float are IEE 754 floats for over 25 years and since Python 1.x, maybe 
earlier. IIRC standard is from 1985. It's how CPUs have dealt with floats for 
over 35 years.

By the way it's is incredible rude to keep re-opening a bug and responding on a 
closed bug. Do not reopen the bug again.

----------
status: open -> closed

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue40981>
_______________________________________

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue40981>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to