Benjamin Peterson added the comment:
After Antoine's review...
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file23057/xattrs.patch
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Benjamin Peterson added the comment:
51e27f42beda and friends.
--
resolution: -> fixed
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/i
Benjamin Peterson added the comment:
You're invoking undefined behavior by modifying function locals in exec().
--
nosy: +benjamin.peterson
resolution: -> invalid
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.
Benjamin Peterson added the comment:
Can you qualify the OSError except by checking it's errno?
--
nosy: +benjamin.peterson
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/i
Benjamin Peterson added the comment:
Applied in r83951. Thanks for the patch!
--
nosy: +benjamin.peterson
resolution: -> accepted
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/
Benjamin Peterson added the comment:
Applied in r84124. Thanks for the patch.
--
resolution: -> accepted
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/
Benjamin Peterson added the comment:
Thanks for the patch. r84129
--
resolution: -> accepted
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/
Benjamin Peterson added the comment:
Some comments:
- The test should be in test_abc.py and should probably not use a collections
class.
- Use test_support.gc_collect().
- What's the __len__() stuff for?
--
keywords: -26backport
___
Python tr
Changes by Benjamin Peterson :
--
assignee: -> rhettinger
nosy: +rhettinger
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue9626>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mai
Benjamin Peterson added the comment:
You can create weakref subclasses anyway now.
--
resolution: wont fix -> out of date
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue
Changes by Benjamin Peterson :
--
versions: -Python 3.1, Python 3.2
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue616013>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailin
Benjamin Peterson added the comment:
It would be possible now, though perhaps inadvisable, to proxy isinstance and
issubclass.
--
nosy: +benjamin.peterson
resolution: out of date ->
status: closed -> open
versions: +Python 3.2
___
Python t
Changes by Benjamin Peterson :
--
resolution: out of date -> rejected
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue762920>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mai
Benjamin Peterson added the comment:
Please post to python-ideas first.
--
nosy: +benjamin.peterson
resolution: -> rejected
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/
Changes by Benjamin Peterson :
--
resolution: -> fixed
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1113244>
___
___
Python-bugs-
Changes by Benjamin Peterson :
--
assignee: -> bethard
nosy: +bethard
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue9653>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mai
Benjamin Peterson added the comment:
r84229
--
nosy: +benjamin.peterson
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue843590>
___
_
Benjamin Peterson added the comment:
r84230
--
resolution: -> fixed
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue2521>
___
___
Changes by Benjamin Peterson :
--
resolution: -> duplicate
status: open -> closed
superseder: -> 2to3 does not convert __builtins__.file
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.o
Benjamin Peterson added the comment:
The compiler module is deprecated and essentially unmaintained.
--
resolution: -> wont fix
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/
Changes by Benjamin Peterson :
--
resolution: -> wont fix
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue3417>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscri
Changes by Benjamin Peterson :
--
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue3417>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscri
Benjamin Peterson added the comment:
This is correct. immutable types should use __new__, not __init__.
--
nosy: +benjamin.peterson
resolution: -> invalid
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/
Benjamin Peterson added the comment:
Is LLVM a supported platform?
--
nosy: +benjamin.peterson
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue9662>
___
___
Pytho
Benjamin Peterson added the comment:
r84276. I didn't "fix" the second case "raise e, None" since that syntax is
quite pointless.
--
nosy: +benjamin.peterson
resolution: -> fixed
status: open -> closed
___
Python t
Benjamin Peterson added the comment:
Why should it be?
--
nosy: +benjamin.peterson
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue9665>
___
___
Python-bug
Benjamin Peterson added the comment:
2010/8/23 Daniel Stutzbach :
>
> Daniel Stutzbach added the comment:
>
>> Why should it be?
>
> The error indicates that the definition in the .c file doesn't match the
> declaration in the .h file, with respect to the
Changes by Benjamin Peterson :
--
resolution: -> rejected
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1057417>
___
___
Pyth
Changes by Benjamin Peterson :
--
resolution: -> duplicate
status: open -> closed
superseder: -> Copy cgi.escape() to html
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.o
Changes by Benjamin Peterson :
--
assignee: d...@python -> benjamin.peterson
nosy: +benjamin.peterson
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/iss
Benjamin Peterson added the comment:
Fixed in r84294. I will not backport to 3.1. Thanks for the contribution!
--
keywords: +gsoc -patch
resolution: -> accepted
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/
Benjamin Peterson added the comment:
Please post to python-ideas first, and note that no syntax changes are allowed
until 3.3.
--
nosy: +benjamin.peterson
resolution: -> rejected
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/iss
Changes by Benjamin Peterson :
--
resolution: -> fixed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue9541>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscri
Benjamin Peterson added the comment:
I'll close this then.
--
resolution: -> rejected
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python
Benjamin Peterson added the comment:
2010/8/25 Carsten Klein :
>
> Carsten Klein added the comment:
>
> Thanks for the information. Where is this documented? I cannot find it in the
> official Python docs... TIA.
http://docs.python.org/dev/reference/datamodel.html
Benjamin Peterson added the comment:
FWIW, I'm -1 on this without a demonstrable improvement on some real-world
cases.
--
nosy: +benjamin.peterson
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/i
Benjamin Peterson added the comment:
2010/8/25 Raymond Hettinger :
> I suppose we could prepare a patch, instrument it, and try it with Twisted,
> SQLalchemy, and Django to find-out how many tuple hash calculations would be
> saved by memoizing.
You should also check mem
Benjamin Peterson added the comment:
r84320.
--
nosy: +benjamin.peterson
resolution: -> fixed
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/
Benjamin Peterson added the comment:
You'll have to look at the compile flags or search the future flags.
--
nosy: +benjamin.peterson
resolution: -> wont fix
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python
Benjamin Peterson added the comment:
I see that it's a problem, but there's nothing we can do about it now, so
you'll have to determine whether it was unicode literals or not based on
compile flags.
--
___
Python tracker
<http
Benjamin Peterson added the comment:
2010/8/26 Kay Hayen :
>
> Kay Hayen added the comment:
>
> Hello Benjamin,
>
> thank you for the response. What do you mean with there is "nothing we can do
> about it". Is it not possible to add another field indicating t
Changes by Benjamin Peterson :
--
resolution: -> fixed
status: open -> pending
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1433886>
___
___
Python-bugs-
Changes by Benjamin Peterson :
--
status: pending -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1433886>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Un
Benjamin Peterson added the comment:
2010/8/27 Kay Hayen :
>
> Kay Hayen added the comment:
>
> This is to inform you that I worked around the bug by reading the source file
> in question and checking the indicated position. This is currently the only
> way to decide if a
Changes by Benjamin Peterson :
--
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue9702>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscri
Changes by Benjamin Peterson :
--
resolution: later -> invalid
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue9702>
___
___
Pyth
Benjamin Peterson added the comment:
2010/8/27 david :
>
> david added the comment:
>
> Excuse me for reporting weird and not expected behaviour on behalf of *most*
> coders.
Your assumption that most coders are confused by this comes from where?
>
> Here https://bu
Benjamin Peterson added the comment:
Please use a language that makes sense to you then.
--
nosy: +benjamin.peterson
resolution: later -> invalid
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/
Changes by Benjamin Peterson :
--
resolution: later -> invalid
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue9702>
___
___
Pyth
Benjamin Peterson added the comment:
Please post to python-ideas first, and note a moratorium on builtin changes is
inplace.
--
nosy: +benjamin.peterson
resolution: -> rejected
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.p
Benjamin Peterson added the comment:
Rest assured: it's expected behavior.
--
nosy: +benjamin.peterson
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/i
Benjamin Peterson added the comment:
They're also harmless.
--
nosy: +benjamin.peterson
priority: normal -> low
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.or
Benjamin Peterson added the comment:
2010/8/30 Skip Montanaro :
>
> Skip Montanaro added the comment:
>
> A couple wording comments:
>
> "All streams are careful about the type of data you give to them"
> would read better as "All streams accept specific t
Benjamin Peterson added the comment:
r84364
--
nosy: +benjamin.peterson
resolution: -> fixed
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/
Benjamin Peterson added the comment:
Well, that's a another issue completely.
--
nosy: +benjamin.peterson
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.or
Benjamin Peterson added the comment:
r84376.
--
nosy: +benjamin.peterson
resolution: -> fixed
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/
Benjamin Peterson added the comment:
What's the point of '{}'.format() anyway given the format() builtin?
--
nosy: +benjamin.peterson
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.py
Benjamin Peterson added the comment:
Will be fixed in 2.7.1.
--
nosy: +benjamin.peterson
resolution: -> out of date
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/
Benjamin Peterson added the comment:
I don't think this is very useful. You could just as well exclude the future
fixer completely.
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/i
Benjamin Peterson added the comment:
2010/9/1 Daniel Stutzbach :
>
> Daniel Stutzbach added the comment:
>
> Excluding the future fixer would only get me half of the way there. I would
> still need to add "from __future__ import print_statement" to all of my
&g
Benjamin Peterson added the comment:
I rejecting, mostly to avoid feature creep. (This shouldn't be too difficult to
accomplish with a shell script.) You could also look at 3to2.
--
resolution: -> rejected
status: open -> closed
___
Pyt
Changes by Benjamin Peterson :
--
resolution: -> works for me
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue9744>
___
___
Pyth
Benjamin Peterson added the comment:
We don't maintain an Italian version of the tutorial. You'll have to contact
its maintainer.
--
nosy: +benjamin.peterson
resolution: -> wont fix
status: open -> closed
___
Pytho
Benjamin Peterson added the comment:
I don't think the order should be defined.
--
nosy: +benjamin.peterson
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/i
Benjamin Peterson added the comment:
Indeed, PEP 3179 is only supposed to add support for people who wish to version
their modules.
--
resolution: -> rejected
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/
Benjamin Peterson added the comment:
This was purposeful. See PEP 372.
--
nosy: +benjamin.peterson
resolution: -> invalid
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/
Changes by Benjamin Peterson :
--
assignee: -> rhettinger
nosy: +rhettinger
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue9825>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mai
Changes by Benjamin Peterson :
--
assignee: d...@python -> vinay.sajip
nosy: +vinay.sajip
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue9827>
___
___
Python-
Benjamin Peterson added the comment:
r84714
--
nosy: +benjamin.peterson
resolution: -> fixed
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/
Benjamin Peterson added the comment:
Thank you, Martin. Reenabled the test in r84735.
--
resolution: -> fixed
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/
Benjamin Peterson added the comment:
r84754
--
nosy: +benjamin.peterson
resolution: -> fixed
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/
Benjamin Peterson added the comment:
+1 for a failing one. (Does the base implementation not raise?)
Is it even possible to implement a real one without buffering?
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue9
Benjamin Peterson added the comment:
2010/9/15 Daniel Stutzbach :
>
> Daniel Stutzbach added the comment:
>
> Attached is a script to find all of the mismatches between the C and Python
> implementations. There are several. Below is the output:
>
> BufferedRandom pyt
Benjamin Peterson added the comment:
2010/9/15 Daniel Stutzbach :
>
> Daniel Stutzbach added the comment:
>
>> These attributes exist; they're just not properties.
>
> Yes, I see. They're added to the instance in the constructor, so they don't
> exi
Benjamin Peterson added the comment:
2010/9/15 Daniel Stutzbach :
>
> Daniel Stutzbach added the comment:
>
> Roundup does not play well with Gmail when Gmail is in Rich Format mode ;-)
>
> That example should have read:
>
>>>> f = io.FileIO(1)
>>>&
Benjamin Peterson added the comment:
2010/9/15 Daniel Stutzbach :
>
> Daniel Stutzbach added the comment:
>
>> Hmm, none the less other code expects it.
>
> Does that imply that there's some code that will break on FileIO objects that
> are created using a
Benjamin Peterson added the comment:
And indeed that's expected. Don't do that.
--
nosy: +benjamin.peterson
resolution: -> invalid
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.p
Benjamin Peterson added the comment:
-1 The Makefile is very implementation specific to CPython.
--
nosy: +benjamin.peterson
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue9
Benjamin Peterson added the comment:
Yes, it's unfortunate that that is exposed. Hopefully, sysconfig will evolve
some way to find information independent of implementation.
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/i
Benjamin Peterson added the comment:
2010/9/16 Brett Cannon :
>
> Brett Cannon added the comment:
>
> Yes, it's just a question of how to interpret it. If we bother keeping the
> info in there, should it be for all updates to PEPs, or just when a PEP is
> added?
I
Changes by Benjamin Peterson :
--
resolution: -> duplicate
status: open -> closed
superseder: -> __dict__ = self in subclass of dict causes a memory leak?
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.o
Benjamin Peterson added the comment:
I consider this to be a feature. Properties can raise AttributeError to defer
to __getattr__.
--
nosy: +benjamin.peterson
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1
Benjamin Peterson added the comment:
2010/9/20 Mark Lawrence :
>
> Mark Lawrence added the comment:
>
> No reply to msg110599, I'll close this in a couple of weeks unless anyone
> objects.
Please don't. This is still a valid issue.
-
Changes by Benjamin Peterson :
--
resolution: -> rejected
status: pending -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue2027>
___
___
Pyth
Benjamin Peterson added the comment:
None offsets gone in r84931.
--
nosy: +benjamin.peterson
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1778>
___
___
Pytho
Changes by Benjamin Peterson :
--
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue9582>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscri
Benjamin Peterson added the comment:
2010/9/23 Antoine Pitrou :
>
> Antoine Pitrou added the comment:
>
> Actually, it is because bz2 doesn't call PyType_Ready() but instead sets some
> field manually. Perhaps we could have a guard somewhere that raises a fatal
> e
Benjamin Peterson added the comment:
I would say it's strange but correct. (and unavoidable I think)
--
resolution: -> invalid
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python
Benjamin Peterson added the comment:
r85003 Thanks for the report.
--
nosy: +benjamin.peterson
resolution: -> fixed
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/
Benjamin Peterson added the comment:
Reverted, however. Let me clarify: you think the unhelpful part is that the
count includes keyword arguments? This change was intentional, actually wrt to
cases like this:
>>> def f(a):
...pass
>>> f(6, a=4, *(1, 2, 3))
Benjamin Peterson added the comment:
Indeed, -1. We don't make a habit of distributing 3rd party binaries.
--
nosy: +benjamin.peterson
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/i
Benjamin Peterson added the comment:
r85022
--
nosy: +benjamin.peterson
resolution: -> fixed
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/
Changes by Benjamin Peterson :
--
assignee: -> jnoller
nosy: +jnoller
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue9955>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mai
Benjamin Peterson added the comment:
This seems rather open-ended and all-encompassing. Wouldn't it be better to
have individual issues for specific tests?
--
nosy: +benjamin.peterson
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Benjamin Peterson added the comment:
I see the problem; will consider/fix later today hopefully.
--
assignee: -> benjamin.peterson
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issu
Benjamin Peterson added the comment:
As of r85154, type.__abstractmethods__ now raises an AttributeError, too.
--
resolution: -> fixed
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/i
Benjamin Peterson added the comment:
2010/10/1 Yaroslav Halchenko :
>
> Yaroslav Halchenko added the comment:
>
> yikes... surprising resolution -- I expected that fix would either makes
> __abstractmethods__ accessible in derived "type"s or becomes absent from
>
Benjamin Peterson added the comment:
You can now create metaclass abcs. However, having __abstractmethods__ does not
prevent instance creation. This is a problem with a builtins, though.
--
resolution: -> fixed
status: open -> closed
___
Benjamin Peterson added the comment:
It matters when exceptions are expected or are a normal part of control flow.
For example StopIteration.
--
nosy: +benjamin.peterson
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue10
Benjamin Peterson added the comment:
2010/10/4 Eric Smith :
>
> Eric Smith added the comment:
>
> Right. It seemed like a hassle to have the str.format parser try to figure
> out what a valid identifier is, so it just passes it through.
You can always use "str.isid
201 - 300 of 4969 matches
Mail list logo