Benjamin Peterson <benja...@python.org> added the comment: 2010/8/26 Kay Hayen <rep...@bugs.python.org>: > > Kay Hayen <kayha...@gmx.de> added the comment: > > Hello Benjamin, > > thank you for the response. What do you mean with there is "nothing we can do > about it". Is it not possible to add another field indicating the prefix > given to a literal?
We can't do anything about it because 2.7 has been released and a "new flag" would be a disallowed new feature. > > BTW: I believe raw strings are also no longer recognizable. Fortunately I do > not need to do that, but look here: If you need to recognize those (or unicode literals for that matter), you could look at the parser module's raw trees. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue9690> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
