[issue8362] Add Misc/maintainers.rst to 2.x branch

anatoly techtonik added the comment: Just stumbled upon this stuff. Good job. I can already see how it can be useful. -- nosy: +techtonik ___ Python tracker ___ _

[issue8362] Add Misc/maintainers.rst to 2.x branch

Éric Araujo added the comment: We’ve agreed on that :) Thanks. -- stage: -> committed/rejected ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs

[issue8362] Add Misc/maintainers.rst to 2.x branch

STINNER Victor added the comment: I added Misc/maintainers.rst in 2.7 (r81899). But I don't want to maintain it, so merwork, will have to send me your patches ;-) -- resolution: -> fixed status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker

[issue8362] Add Misc/maintainers.rst to 2.x branch

Éric Araujo added the comment: Updating the files. haypo, your move! :) -- ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Un

[issue8362] Add Misc/maintainers.rst to 2.x branch

Changes by Éric Araujo : Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file17630/maintainers.diff ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list

[issue8362] Add Misc/maintainers.rst to 2.x branch

Changes by Éric Araujo : Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file17629/maintainers.rst ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list

[issue8362] Add Misc/maintainers.rst to 2.x branch

Changes by Éric Araujo : Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file16854/maintainers.diff ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing li

[issue8362] Add Misc/maintainers.rst to 2.x branch

Changes by Éric Araujo : Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file16853/maintainers.rst ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing lis

[issue8362] Add Misc/maintainers.rst to 2.x branch

Éric Araujo added the comment: I am willing to maintain the maintainers file for 2.x with due diligence for the coming years. I think it has proven useful, and would like to see it in 2.6 up to 3.2 (all current four branches, since it’s arguably a documentation issue). Do I need to find a uni

[issue8362] Add Misc/maintainers.rst to 2.x branch

R. David Murray added the comment: Any module without a listed maintainer is maintained by the community as a whole (as it says in the introduction). The fact that a module does not have a listed maintainer does not mean it is dead, and I don't think anyone(except you? :) thinks that. All m

[issue8362] Add Misc/maintainers.rst to 2.x branch

STINNER Victor added the comment: I read the maintainers list. I don't like empty lines. If a module has no maintainer, it should not be listed in this file. Since Python3 module names are different, if we copy the list to Python2, maintaining this list between Python2 and Python3 will be mor

[issue8362] Add Misc/maintainers.rst to 2.x branch

R. David Murray added the comment: @Éric: even if you prepare the patches, I find I'm not interested in doing the checkins. If someone else wants to take this on that's fine with me, but I'm not going to do it. -- assignee: georg.brandl -> ___ Py

[issue8362] Add Misc/maintainers.rst to 2.x branch

Giampaolo Rodola' added the comment: I'm the one who recently added FTPS support to ftplib.py and wrote tests for both FTP and FTPS. I'm not the "maintaner" of the module but I'd like to be notified in case of issues about it, so would it make sense for me to appear in the list? -- n

[issue8362] Add Misc/maintainers.rst to 2.x branch

Changes by Éric Araujo : -- keywords: +needs review priority: -> normal ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsub

[issue8362] Add Misc/maintainers.rst to 2.x branch

Changes by Ezio Melotti : -- nosy: +ezio.melotti type: -> feature request ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Uns

[issue8362] Add Misc/maintainers.rst to 2.x branch

Éric Araujo added the comment: Module names have to be converted only once, so now maintenance is just keeping names updated. I’m willing to commit to maintaining the maintainers file <0.2 meta wink> with one caveat: Core developers can commit and merge immediately, keeping branches in sync,

[issue8362] Add Misc/maintainers.rst to 2.x branch

R. David Murray added the comment: I didn't put maintainers.rst into 2.6 because I didn't want to commit to maintaining the two divergent copies. If you want to commit to maintaining it in the 2.x branch (copying changes backwards from the 3.x branch), then I'd be +0 (or maybe even +0.5) on

[issue8362] Add Misc/maintainers.rst to 2.x branch

Changes by Éric Araujo : -- keywords: +patch Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file16854/maintainers.diff ___ Python tracker ___ ___ P

[issue8362] Add Misc/maintainers.rst to 2.x branch

New submission from Éric Araujo : Hello The maintainers listing is helpful for us outside bug reporters, but only present in the py3k branch. I copied it and reverted module name changes. Attached is the resulting file and the diff against py3k. Regards -- assignee: georg.brandl comp