R. David Murray <rdmur...@bitdance.com> added the comment: Any module without a listed maintainer is maintained by the community as a whole (as it says in the introduction). The fact that a module does not have a listed maintainer does not mean it is dead, and I don't think anyone(except you? :) thinks that. All modules are listed for completeness, and so that it is obvious which modules it would be most helpful if someone with an interest put themselves down as expert for (as Giampaolo has just done for ftplib).
Algorithms was listed as an interested area as a result of a brainstorming session for interest areas. I think we had Raymond in mind :). If no one has chosen to be listed, that line should probably be deleted. I think perhaps the name chosen for the file was unfortunate. I view it more as the 'experts' file, rather than the maintainers file, though in some cases the expert is indeed the principle maintainer of the module (such as Vinay for logging). ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue8362> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
