Changes by G Young :
--
pull_requests: +2042
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue29596>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Changes by G Young :
--
pull_requests: +2041
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue29596>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Changes by G Young :
--
pull_requests: +1873
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue29510>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Changes by G Young :
--
pull_requests: +1801
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue29596>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Changes by G Young :
--
pull_requests: +1797
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue30361>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
G Young added the comment:
Second time around does the charm. I see the hidden "-" in the scientific
notation is causing this. Thanks!
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.o
G Young added the comment:
That doesn't make sense to me. Can you explain how that is intended behaviour?
I just changed from '-' to '?' in the lineterminator.
--
___
Python tracker
<http:
New submission from G Young:
When writing scientific notation to CSV with custom line-terminators, the
behaviour is inconsistent depending on the line-terminator you use.
In the file provided, two different line-terminator result in one quoting the
number as a string and the other not. IMO
New submission from G Young:
This issue arose as we were making changes to the 'pandas' library. I am not
sure if this is a bug or feature, but it definitely did not cross anyone's
minds when discussing the PR at hand. I have attached a code sample to
illustrate the "
G Young added the comment:
Google indicates that this is indeed a feature of the language. Sorry about
that! I guess that was a miscommunication on the PR-end.
--
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issu
10 matches
Mail list logo